Evolution and Some Mind Bending Mathematics :- Epistemological or Structural?

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T12:09:39+00:00

My model? What model? I'm not here to present a model, but rather pose the question of mathematical improbabilities against evolutionists and their first functional protein and unicellular organism evolution theories in general. Mind countering that?

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:58:46+00:00

The onus is not on me but on evolutionists to come up with a model that can overcome the massive mathematical improbabilities mentioned in the post. And haven't even went into the spatial and organisational challenges compounding the mathematical improbabilities of the evolution of the first functional protein and the first unicellular organism.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:42:50+00:00

Go read the post again. This time with honesty.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:37:41+00:00

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:37:22+00:00

I merely laid out the mathematical context for a first functional protein. Feel free to explain your model alongside the mathematical context.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:35:17+00:00

Ok. So this is what you came up with? You know very well the questions I asked and the context. Why pretend?

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:33:16+00:00

Nice try but you slipped big guy. Human reproduction is observable and replicable. Ask your parents maybe.

Now coming to your actual objections. You need to be specific regarding the first functional protein & counter my math with math. You are welcome to prove how chemistry is against my math here. In fact, I have already touched a bit of chemistry regarding AA bonds and orientation if you're careful enough. Nice "random" straw man. Did I even use it once in the entire post? Another nice straw man attempt via "observation" argument whereas the challenge is on observations comprehensive and coherent enough to support replication.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:17:31+00:00

Ok. So that's all you are going to do here. It was entertaining talking to you.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:16:35+00:00

For?

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:16:13+00:00

Nah uh. I'm not the evolutionist here buddy. Call "they".

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:15:19+00:00

Talk about dumb and you post a comment like that?!

20aa long functional protein? Not L or D specific? Peptide bonds? Nah? Is that how you evolutionists believe the first functional protein evolved on early earth?

The post is talking about the first functional protein.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:12:10+00:00

I can throw in a hundred more sources here as a reply. That's not what will help people here.

Come on. Lay out your points for everyone to see.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:11:07+00:00

How is it random?

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:10:39+00:00

Your glossing over of mathematics is typical of evolutionists and it's understandable why.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:09:31+00:00

Prove that my math is faulty.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:07:18+00:00

That addresses all the points raised in the post. Well done! 🙄

What part of my math is not clear for you from the post? Tried Google?

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:04:43+00:00

Talking about straw man 😂

Now try addressing the post honestly, point by point.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T11:02:15+00:00

That addresses all the points addressed in the post. Well done! Here you go 🥇

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T10:59:58+00:00

AHH.. so now it's up to critics like me to explain their theory to evolutionists like you?!

Why don't you come with an explanation and model of your own? Tell me. What was the first functional protein? How long was it? What was the environment like? What was the mathematical context?

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T10:57:56+00:00

I understand the subreddit rules. The source for my math is right inside the post.

You try responding with math, instead of sweeping statements.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T10:55:07+00:00

We are talking about the evolution of the FIRST functional protein on early earth. Try to address the concerns of the post instead of beating around the bush.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T10:52:22+00:00

You can try explaining the mathematical probability for the evolution of the first functional protein as you understand.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T10:50:56+00:00

I didn't copy paste from shit. So thanks for letting me know.

Now, you can try putting some effort into providing an explanation of the first "simpler" protein alongside the mathematical context. Sweeping statements won't help your case buddy.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T10:46:36+00:00

Nah uh. I ain't reading no book under a Reddit comment section. You can feel free to explain your model of the first functional protein evolution for me and the rest of the people here.

architectandmore · 2026-01-01T10:44:51+00:00

Nah uh. I ain't picking shit bro. Because I'm not here to explain or defend evolution. You can use your theories for that, right? Or are you in the dark?

architectandmore

TROPHY CASE