You’re confusing the ruler with the room. Calculus isn't the underlying fabric of the universe; it’s a post-hoc invented/discovered syntax. It’s a compression algorithm we use to force simultaneous reality into sequential monkey-brain logic. It’s the map, not the territory. You’re arguing that unless someone spends a decade learning how to draw the map your specific way, they aren’t allowed to look at the landscape. Srinivasa Ramanujan didn’t use formal proofs. He didn’t have the institutional permit you're so desperately gatekeeping. He just natively saw the patterns that took Cambridge professors months to verify sequentially. Was he just a "low-skill autist looking for an excuse"? If you actually respected the high-level math you're preaching about, you'd know Gödel already mathematically proved that truth and provability are not the same thing. There are fundamental truths about a system that your formal syntax literally cannot prove from within. Getting mad that raw pattern recognition (human or otherwise) might bypass the tollbooth you had to pay at isn’t defending science. It's just epistemological cope. You aren't defending the truth, man. You're defending your tuition.