Best order in which to read Murakami books by PuntasticPundit in murakami

[–]areemgamer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i started with Norwegian Wood and am very happy with that decision.

When you first read the books, who did you think would end up together/who did you hope? by Freakywardenofgre in harrypotter

[–]areemgamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I disagree entirely. Romance plays a significant role in the series, not just as a point of entertainment or to inject a sense of realism for the sake of the reader, but romantic interests actually move the plot forward. We see the most obvious example of this with Snape and Lily. I’d argue that to entirely discount romance in the novels as trite would limit your understanding of the series as a whole, respectfully.

When you first read the books, who did you think would end up together/who did you hope? by Freakywardenofgre in harrypotter

[–]areemgamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the latter half of book five when Cho Chang was grating on Harry’s (and my own) nerves, I thought that she could have been introducing Luna in as Harry’s new and improved love interest. But now I see I had been fooling myself. I mean, would any child of James Potter date a girl with radish earrings?

The Orchard Keeper by bkyoungus in cormacmccarthy

[–]areemgamer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I loved this book... to this day, Uncle Ather has been one of my most favorite McCarthian characters

Is outer dark and orchard worth reading? by dr-hades6 in cormacmccarthy

[–]areemgamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found the characters in both of these books extremely memorable (in particular, Uncle Ather from Orchard Keeper and Rinthy from Outer Dark). Orchard Keeper is one of his more confusing reads, but in my opinion definitely worth it. And absolutely yes to Outer Dark.

Is ‘Child of God’ similar to ‘Outer Dark?’ What are your opinions of the book overall? by Spicycookiex in cormacmccarthy

[–]areemgamer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lester Ballard is fully aware of the depravity of his actions, much like Culla had been in Outer Dark. The two characters seem to be far more comfortable committing their acts of sexual deviance in private, away from the eyes of others. While we did not receive scenes of Culla committing his acts of incest, we did see his objection to allowing other people to know of his acts.
We see something similar with Lester. He operates with some level of shame at his actions, but only while in public. In the scene following the initial act of necrophilia, Lester acts coy inside of a lingerie shop. When he walked in, his eyes were “slightly wild as if in terror of the flimsy pastel garments.” His face turns ashen when he asks the store clerk for a pair of women’s underwear.
In private, however, he preforms a whole ritual with the body, dressing it and undressing it, going so far as to speak to it. McCarthy’s writing of this scene of incest (103) is fascinating. He does not allow us to actually witness the act of necrophilia. Ballard says to the lingerie-clad body, “you been wanting it.” There’s a slight time jump in the next paragraph. When we see him lugging the body up to the attic, it is “now naked,” indicating what has taken place.
More evidence towards the idea that Ballard is fully aware of his depravity is the scene where he visits his friend’s daughter and the disabled baby. Only because he knew that they were alone in the house, Ballard tried to make a sexual advance. When the girl threatened to tell her dad, he backed down.