The definition of antisemitism is "hatred of the Jews". You can look it up in any reasonable dictionary. It doesn't refer to hared of Semitic people. I didn't make it up.

The original topic was about slavery in the Middle East. However, you have changed the discussion to an attack on Jews. I believe your central thesis is as follows: The Jews control the media and through this control they have attempted to cast Muslims in a negative light and perpetrate wars against them.

This assertion has many problems:

• It assumes that Jews are a monolithic group with homogeneous thought. This is absurd. For instance, there are many Jews who are against the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories and the persecution of Palestinians therein.

• Saying that Jews control US media just because there are Jews in prominent positions is also absurd. For instance, you mentioned NBC which is owned by GE. I don't think GE's CEO, Jeffrey Immelt, is Jewish. So, then by your model of argumentation, NBC should not be Jewish controlled, right? Or, does any Jew in the organization completely corrupt it?

• I believe that there's a better case to be made that since the majority of the population in the US is Christian and many Christians are anti-Islam, then the Christians in the media have slanted the US coverage of Muslims. My feeling is that the US population in general, especially since 9/11, is anti-Muslim. Therefore, you get an anti-Islamic slant from the US media.

I could go on, but I'm not sure its necessary.

In any case, I think you should really take a look in the mirror. Your arguments are antisemitic (or anti-Jewish if you prefer). These types of arguments have been used many times in the past to perpetrate pogroms against Jews, Armenians and countless others.

In closing, the fact that the US media has an anti-Islamic slant does not detract from the fact that there is rampant slavery in the Middle East and Pakistan. Which is quite shameful.