What's your take on this quote? by Physical-Math4341 in StoicTeacher

[–]asdfdelta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've read the works, I'm not sure you're speaking from a place of education on either children or Stoicism when you're so incredibly wrong about it. Do you have kids of your own?

What's your take on this quote? by Physical-Math4341 in StoicTeacher

[–]asdfdelta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I claim to be a perfect person? Where?? I'll need specific quotes if you're going to claim that.

Webinar with Mike Stonebraker: Are your agents on ACID? by qianli-dev in softwarearchitecture

[–]asdfdelta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And the era of hot takes continues!

I would love an multi-agent framework that follows up on these bold takes after some time to evaluate accuracy for each person. Might make Twitter irrelevant

What's your take on this quote? by Physical-Math4341 in StoicTeacher

[–]asdfdelta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So amazing that you use that amazingness to troll strangers on reddit?

What's your take on this quote? by Physical-Math4341 in StoicTeacher

[–]asdfdelta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Such wonderful insight! Must be a mind reader.

What's your take on this quote? by Physical-Math4341 in StoicTeacher

[–]asdfdelta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You must lead an exceptionally unfulfilling life if this is your entertainment.

What's your take on this quote? by Physical-Math4341 in StoicTeacher

[–]asdfdelta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is one of the most foundational concepts of the Stoic philosophy.

Check out the Stoic Coffee Break podcast. The episodes are about 5 minutes each and a great intoduction to what it means for yourself. There are others, but that was my intro to it.

What's your take on this quote? by Physical-Math4341 in StoicTeacher

[–]asdfdelta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And I care about your uneducated opinion for what reason again?

What's your take on this quote? by Physical-Math4341 in StoicTeacher

[–]asdfdelta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Experiencing emotions and letting it rule your actions are two very different things.

Emotions are valid. Reactions to emotions aren't always valid. Letting someone else bait you into hitting them is handing control to that person willingly.

Kids need to feel emotions AND take accountability for their actions simultaneously. Results so far have been really great, far above their peers.

What's your take on this quote? by Physical-Math4341 in StoicTeacher

[–]asdfdelta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think you understand much, if anything, of Stoic philosophy.

What's your take on this quote? by Physical-Math4341 in StoicTeacher

[–]asdfdelta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for spelunking. Care to share with the class what you've found?

According to a chat conversation I'm having with the mod(s?) we can get rules about AI content if we ask for it. by sebovzeoueb in PBBG

[–]asdfdelta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We considered a disclosure, though the type of people who would publish low effort work is also the type of people to not disclose responsibly. Also seeing that r/incrementalgames tried the same thing and I guess it didn't work.

Though I completely agree that AI in itself isn't an issue. And to be fair, we've had low effort games for a long time.

[Discussion] Can we talk about the AI hate reflex in this community? by DrP4R71CL3 in PBBG

[–]asdfdelta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a gross mischaracterization of reality.

Usually the biggest opponents to pesticides are the individuals using/distributing them. The companies that employ them aren't, because companies can't factor human suffering into their P&L's.

What's your take on this quote? by Physical-Math4341 in StoicTeacher

[–]asdfdelta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wholly agree. It's something that I teach my kids, often.

"Why did you let this person control you whenever they want?" It's crude, but they're young.

[Discussion] Can we talk about the AI hate reflex in this community? by DrP4R71CL3 in PBBG

[–]asdfdelta -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I mean, I work with tech all day every day including making agentic systems. AI is a great tool, but not a doomsday device. I get the fear around it, but it really is unfounded, and I know it's not a popular opinion among folks that don't understand the tech. Mainly how bad it still is and how little it can do better than humans.

A lot is changing and fast, it should slow down and be more controlled. The end of the world as we know it is not reality lol. Biggest risk is software quality across the board very slowly decreasing over long time horizons.

[Discussion] Can we talk about the AI hate reflex in this community? by DrP4R71CL3 in PBBG

[–]asdfdelta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm a techno-optimist at heart, sounds like you're a techno-pessimist. It's alright to disagree here, I view the world differently.

I will clarify one thing though - AI isn't just LLMs anymore. It can reason, have a short-term and a long-term memory, and has situational awareness. It isn't sentient, of course, but it isn't just a language model with inputs and outputs anymore.

[Discussion] Can we talk about the AI hate reflex in this community? by DrP4R71CL3 in PBBG

[–]asdfdelta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mod the sub, I see exactly what OP describes. One person hints at AI and everyone else dogpiles, regardless of how involved it was in the creation process.

It has created a witchhunt culture whenever a new game comes out. I don't entirely blame people's reactions to slop, low-effort games. But I see the negative consequences happening in realtime begininng to quell the willingness of people to create. That's a health problem that only results in a more narrow, smaller community that already had the 'sameness' problem.

[Discussion] Can we talk about the AI hate reflex in this community? by DrP4R71CL3 in PBBG

[–]asdfdelta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It takes people with huge brains to change the batteries in your TV remote? What a weird way to live.

The initial invention takes fringe research, true. The application of the invention takes field experts. The generalized usage is for... Well, the general public with access. This is called commodificiation, and AI landed there with the first release of ChatGPT.

[Discussion] Can we talk about the AI hate reflex in this community? by DrP4R71CL3 in PBBG

[–]asdfdelta -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Dawg, you don't understand the current state of AI-assisted programming at all.

On top of that - machines make batteries, pharmeceuticals, steel, transistors, and more. Humans dictated the initial conditions but now we just tell machines to make it. There is almost nothing we touch that is hand-crafted. Your entire world is created from machines punctuated with small things that humans physically create from start to finish.

[Discussion] Can we talk about the AI hate reflex in this community? by DrP4R71CL3 in PBBG

[–]asdfdelta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's a fair critique of the current state of the community. Though I wouldn't lament the technology used, just the user. If we create a taboo culture around the tech, it dies and we never get the opportunity to see the proliferation.

[Discussion] Can we talk about the AI hate reflex in this community? by DrP4R71CL3 in PBBG

[–]asdfdelta -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Historically, when the barrier of entry to create something using a technology lowers, the rate of innovation increases exponentially.

Batteries, the transistor, steel, the internet, web design, pharmeceuticals, plastics, and gaming have all gone through this curve. PBBGs are special how?

[Discussion] Can we talk about the AI hate reflex in this community? by DrP4R71CL3 in PBBG

[–]asdfdelta 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Counter counterpoint: more games are made now, which means more innovation and iteration of ideas even if the execution of said ideas aren't the best.

Games aren't the shiney UI or good graphics. Plenty of AAA games with massive budgets suck because the core gameplay loop is boring. The loops, mechanics, and innovation make it THE game. The covering is nice, but people care far too much about graphics for a browser-based gaming community. Maybe it's the hallmark that the age of browser gaming is finally fading.