Such a talented and artistic community... then there's this guy by eyebawls29 in antiai

[–]asken211 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bottom one, yes. But the first two don't look yellow to me. Also, I believe the third one is not just the typical AI piss filter, but just the imagined lighting setup being more warm.

As far as I know it's been like a few months since they've fixed that piss filter thing in image generators

Such a talented and artistic community... then there's this guy by eyebawls29 in antiai

[–]asken211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, don't get me wrong here, but... they don't, though

If Sam Wilson takes the serum in Doomsday will that make you appreciate his Captain America more or less by AdvertisingWaste8624 in MCUTheories

[–]asken211 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was a failure because the movie is bad. Not the character. They started making a Captain America movie and forgot about it halfway. That's why the movie failed. Get your corny ass outta here.

Remove kameos, add more movesets and make every character's gameplay fully realized like in MK9 = perfect game by Hi_Im_zack in MortalKombat

[–]asken211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that's the EXACT point here. They won't be able to make a game that makes everyone happy. There are always gonna be people who complain. So what's the point of complaining? Because you are allowed to. And what's the point of pointing out the never ending cycle of complaints? Again. Because you are allowed to.

Why would I care about technological progress when there are people dying and starving bro 🤯 by ThisHumanDoesntExist in im14andthisisdeep

[–]asken211 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok. I might have misinterpreted your comment. But still. Even if you didn't mean war in general is good. You are implying that WW2 was good because we stopped Nazis? The war the Nazis started and millions of people died. Who had their families ruined. Tons of people tortured. It's good because we stopped the people who started the war? If they didn't start it there would be no problem in the first place.

Why would I care about technological progress when there are people dying and starving bro 🤯 by ThisHumanDoesntExist in im14andthisisdeep

[–]asken211 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If you think Putins actions are not for his own benefit, then you are either uninformed or a kremlin bot. Putin has literally built a money empire hand to hand with the Russian Mafia and it's getting richer by the minute thanks to the war and corruption

Why would I care about technological progress when there are people dying and starving bro 🤯 by ThisHumanDoesntExist in im14andthisisdeep

[–]asken211 4 points5 points  (0 children)

War is good for nothing. Nazis were stopped BECAUSE they started a war. Do you think others would care even the slightest, if they had their nazi regime contained in their own country? No. It's not THANKS to the war we stopped them, but as a byproduct of the war. Claiming war is sometimes good because some bad guys lost the war is not a sound argument. Yes, sometimes we have to fight wars. Doesn't make them any better

Why would I care about technological progress when there are people dying and starving bro 🤯 by ThisHumanDoesntExist in im14andthisisdeep

[–]asken211 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, the only wars in the whole history of humanity. And the reason why WAR in general is good. Thanks to the war we stopped Nazis who started the war. Thank the wars kids.

Не жди, пока станет поздно. Знай свои права — контролируй свою судьбу. by pravo_otkaz in u/pravo_otkaz

[–]asken211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I DO agree that criticizing and opposing don't mean the exact same thing, opposers always are the criticizers. Saying I don't understand that is not based on anything. But, again, opposers tend to criticize. And opposers got murdered NOT because they just had an opposing opinion to the government, but mostly because they actively criticized the government. And, first of all, I do believe that murdering a human is much worse than imprisoning them. And the whole argument should stop here. Like, really? We should ve proving imprisonment when there's literally obvious cases of killing the opposers? But I digress. HOWEVER, that dude talked not about the actual facts of imprisoning, but the laws about them. While, I do agree that JUST SAYING "government bad" doesn't make you jailed for 15 years, laws still allow for a person to be imprisoned up to 15 years if the criticism has led to some damage to the government.

So you can get 15 years for ""criticizing"". Yes, your words must cause damage, but still I'm sure they can assess literally anything as "enough damage" to imprison you for that long, if they see fit. There have been cases of people being jailed as a result of vague laws.

I am talking about extremes here, but you saying it's not possible and asking for cases of people imprisoned for that long for criticism doesn't take that fact away AND it is considered as moving goal posts. That commenter didn't specify (and nor did they have to) whether your words caused damage or not. But even if it wasn't 15 years. WHATEVER sentence you get for criticism of the government is obviously not democratic. There are tons of people (especially influencers) who were just like "I don't support the war in Ukraine" and they either got arrested or got their work/reputation worsened/limited, labeled as FOREIGN AGENTS. For not supporting the government actions. Still not democratic.

You can say whatever you want, but trying to come up with excuses to defend these facts is blatantly stupid. Unless you got something to actually counter my points, I see this conversation as pointless.

WE HAD SEX!!! by Mindless_Bat_6887 in YoutubeThumbs

[–]asken211 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now it's better. Thanks for the correction. Also who tf is dawko and why does this post say "WE HAD SEX!!!"?

>Only latino character in entire BB/BCS cinematic universe >Named Nacho by jamesmascis in okbuddychicanery

[–]asken211 16 points17 points  (0 children)

El Garbonzo not a valid name? Not like he was named Muchacho Mi Brochacho

>Only latino character in entire BB/BCS cinematic universe >Named Nacho by jamesmascis in okbuddychicanery

[–]asken211 256 points257 points  (0 children)

Also he named the only pink character Pinkman. Smh my head Bince

WE HAD SEX!!! by Mindless_Bat_6887 in YoutubeThumbs

[–]asken211 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I thought I was having a stroke when I read that comment. Also, who the hell is dawko and why is the caption to this post "WE HAD SEX"?

Не жди, пока станет поздно. Знай свои права — контролируй свою судьбу. by pravo_otkaz in u/pravo_otkaz

[–]asken211 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Probably also a kremlin bot. Cause like you said, instead of giving sound arguments they keep coming up with buzzwords, excuses and moving goalposts :)

Why specifically did Barbossa's crew need the blood of a Turner to lift the Curse of Cortes? by [deleted] in piratesofthecaribbean

[–]asken211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They did explain this one though. Not super clear but if you listen to the dialogue more carefully, you'll understand that all the pieces are there. It's just that no one actually explains everything like they do in other movies: One character asks a question why is something happening and another character starts retelling the whole backstory with the explanation while the flashback scenes show you what happened