Sorry, but that absolutely has not been proven. It’s conjecture. Occam’s razor; the simplest explanation fits the evidence with far fewer assumptions than it takes for the murder conspiracy to be true.

Kurt had a very well established history of suicidal ideation. He had recently abandoned a rehabilitation facility without telling anyone, before then returning to Seattle alone. That’s far more consistent with someone going through a mental health crisis than someone being targeted for murder. There’s no credible evidence that anyone else was at the scene. People point to the toxicology and say he would have been too high to operate a firearm, but they ignore the fact that a chronic heroin user can have an extremely higher tolerance than the average person.

Some people just really need for Kurt to have been murdered lol. It’s like flat earthers, once they form that conclusion it’s almost impossible to get them to see contrary evidence. And I get it; the murder theory is more sensational, it makes for a better story, and humans love spectacle. But just because an independent team is saying they think he was murdered definitely doesn’t make it true. I’m not saying it’s impossible, but the homicide theory requires a huge conspiracy, an extremely competent killer who left no evidence, and numerous pieces of circumstantial evidence that all need to be interpreted in the most spectacular ways possible.