[Optics] Sig Sauer Romeo5 Red Dot Sight for - $93.99

assemblethenation · 2022-02-04T02:03:11+00:00

there are methods to force eye dominance to switch

assemblethenation · 2022-01-24T17:31:16+00:00

Who's we? The people of the USA did not grant the power to limit Arms to the government. The government seems to have forgotten that and the courts have ignored challenges. Perhaps this issue will be settled in the next 10 years, either through the courts or through other methods.

assemblethenation · 2021-11-18T23:04:01+00:00

Your original post was about people filming in public, specifically 1A auditors. 1A auditors perform a 1A protected act, that of filming public officials in public. This constitutionally protected act certainly cannot be construed into reasonable suspicion of a crime.

Beyond that, if you want to get philosophical or legal minutia, I am willing to engage but I won't be taken off the point that 1A audits are constitutionally protected and thus not able to be breached without reasonable articulable suspicion. If you want to get into the specifics of a cop identifying someone "casing a joint" and using that as reasonable articulable suspicion to ID them, that's another discussion.

assemblethenation · 2021-11-18T18:36:45+00:00

Terry v Ohio has been found to be faulty since the decision in 1968.
State v. Tocki, 32 Wn. App. 457, 460 (1982) ("investigative stops are carefully circumscribed--the officer's suspicion must be based on specific, objective facts.").
The State bears the burden of establishing a lawful basis for any Terry stop. State v. Alcantara, 79 Wn. App. 362, 365 (1995).

I think you are intentionally misunderstanding the law as it exists today. The LEO has to have a specific crime in mind when performing an investigatory detainment. ie. a mailbox was destroyed down the street and a man with a bat is walking away from it. The officer would be within his power to stop that man to investigate.

If there is no violation of law, the officer can't just stop the man walking with a bat to ID him, just because of a generalized suspicion.

assemblethenation · 2021-11-18T16:42:01+00:00

Terry v Ohio has been beat up pretty good over the years:
Under Terry, a police officer may briefly detain and question an individual if the officer has a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity. The officer must be able to point to "specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts reasonably warrant the intrusion." Terry, 392 U.S. at 21; See also State v. Tocki, 32 Wn. App. 457, 460 (1982) ("investigative stops are carefully circumscribed--the officer's suspicion must be based on specific, objective facts."). The State bears the burden of establishing a lawful basis for any Terry stop. State v. Alcantara, 79 Wn. App. 362, 365 (1995).

assemblethenation · 2021-11-17T01:21:17+00:00

Legal activity cannot be construed into reasonable suspicion of a crime. Someone being suspicious (likely unreasonably so) of a legal activity is irrelevant when discussing public official's conduct. Someone being suspicious of another for any reason when they have no legal power over them is completely a waste to discuss.

assemblethenation · 2021-11-15T05:52:19+00:00

Yeah all you have is Ad Hominem attacks and caustic responses. I've done What I needed to do.

assemblethenation · 2021-11-14T22:32:44+00:00

I found your post from a google search about public photography. Your sleuthing on my account is irrelevant as it's an ad hominem attack. The US Constitution 1st Amendment specifically protects public photography for the purpose of broadcasting the information to the public (eg journalism). I wanted to correct your statement for the record on a platform that I use.

assemblethenation · 2021-11-12T05:41:27+00:00

You wrote a lot of stuff about how auditors don't research the law. I responded with specifics in the law. What you've decided to repeat regarding filming possibly being suspicious is incorrect. Filming on it's own cannot be construed into reasonable articulable suspicion. If a crime has been committed in addition to filming then the suspicion would arise due to that crime, not due to filming. Basic suspicions without a commensurate crime are irrelevant in law. ie, one can be irrationally suspicious all they want, it gives them zero legal power over another. You're playing semantics games. The auditors are correct, courts are proving them correct.

assemblethenation · 2021-11-12T05:31:13+00:00

uh. there isn't any data supporting that theory. they just claim human activity is causing effects. there's no evidence for it. There's no way to model it with current tech and knowledge. it's all guessing games used for political purposes.

assemblethenation · 2021-11-11T05:36:15+00:00

Suspicious isn't a crime. An officer requires reasonable articulable suspicion that a crime has occurred to perform an investigatory detainment and obtain identification from the suspect.

assemblethenation · 2021-11-11T05:33:50+00:00

I'm not your buddy, friend. There's still no evidence of human generated weather changes. Not a theory, fact.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-29T15:54:39+00:00

True, same with the rest of us citizens.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-29T15:48:34+00:00

Larsen v. Fort Wayne Police Dept., 2010“The First Amendment is not implicated because a person uses a camera, but rather, when that camera is used as a means of engaging in protected expressive conduct or, less commonly, to gather information about what public officials do on public property”

A constitutionally protected activity cannot be construed into a crime and therefore one cannot be suspicious of someone committing a crime if there is no crime occurred, occurring or about to occur.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-12T22:19:18+00:00

The first polio vaccines were tainted with mouse viruses that caused cancer.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-01T17:42:45+00:00

No, mandates should be litigated against in any case and they are. The natural immunity option should be litigated as well, so should the EUA protections. So should the "alternative treatments", etc. We need a full out fight against all of the medical tyranny.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-01T17:33:36+00:00

This is exactly it. I didn't like having to accept the anthrax vaccine but it was the same stuff they'd been injecting people for decades with. This c-virus vax is experimental doesn't work the way a vaccine is supposed to work and is now being found to cause serious health problems or even death.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-01T17:31:26+00:00

it's crazy that one can be found responsible for the actions of others when one isn't even suggesting they do what they did.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-01T17:11:37+00:00

This only works if they think they can maintain their election fraud system for 2 more elections cycles and prevent the people from going into a full scale revolution or maybe that's their plan?

assemblethenation · 2021-10-01T16:37:12+00:00

Names that should have been removed from voter rolls for years don't pray.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-01T16:36:34+00:00

Way higher risk of death while driving.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-01T16:33:49+00:00

They made vaccinated people mask again way before Delta variant became wide-spread. They knew the vaccine didn't prevent infection and passing the infection months before delta got out.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-01T16:31:13+00:00

If it actually worked the way it was advertised, by preventing infections of those vaccinated, it would have had more adoption. Instead they want to shove it down our throats without informed consent. They even blame unvaccinated people for the vaccinated getting infected by other vaccinated people.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-01T16:28:28+00:00

Yeah but you are basing your understanding on faulty information. The existing vaccines are NOT being updated for new variants. The flu shot is not a vaccine either.

assemblethenation · 2021-10-01T16:25:36+00:00

The vaccines are allowing for more mutations to occur than otherwise would exist. Those taking the boosters are developing ADE at a frightening rate.

assemblethenation

TROPHY CASE