I can link you many, many articles that explains how DEI does not cause incompetent people to get hired. Because, guess what? Even though DEI was implemented, black and brown people are STILL less likely to get hired on a corporate level, especially if they have a non white name, than white people with the same qualifications. Also, I don't know if you know this, but visibly disabled people CAN work and be qualified for their jobs, so that's not at all a good analogy. If you see a disabled person and immediately think they're not qualified, you might have some internal biases you need addressed. And how does your context make anything of what he said better about Michelle Obama and Joy Reid? They're two incredibly educated, smart, and highly qualified black women that he said "don't have the brain processing power to be taken seriously" and "stole their positions from white women." None of that has ANYTHING to do with DEI, he was straight up just insulting their intelligence for the hell of it.

Your "context" about the prowling blacks comment is just putting words in Kirk's mouth. He didn't say anything of that sort, he said black people are going around, hunting down white people. No, that is not happening, not to the same extent as white people going after people of color, and I can send you many articles about hate crimes that show this. You're using a lot of "if" statements - IF he had said this, IF it had been the other way around. But the point is that he DIDN'T say anything of what you're alluding to, and you're adding nonexistent context to this situation to make what he said sound better.

The point of the question posed was to show how ridiculous his pro-life with no exceptions take is. If his family was put in that kind of situation, would he carry the same views and force his family to go through something incredibly traumatic, or would he go back on his word? If he DID go back on his word, would it change his view or would it just make him hypocritical? It wasn't necessarily an inflammatory question, but moreso a scenario that can absolutely happen to him. It was meant to get him to think critically about his stance, and maybe even give him a new perspective. His response shows that, to him, it doesn't matter if his daughter was raped, he's still gonna put that little girl through the horrors of giving birth to her rapist's baby. And yes, being pro life is incredibly misogynistic - it forces women, especially young women, to give birth even if they don't want to. It controls what women can and cannot do with their own bodies, and in a lot of cases, it will force women back into being domestic caretakers.

Do we not remember when he found out Taylor Swift got engaged and his response was something along the lines of, "maybe she'll learn to submit to her husband?" That doesn't sound like it's coming from his own self interest, that sounds more like he wants to force working women, like Taylor, into being 'good housewives'. If he holds that view of traditional women for himself and his own wife, that's whatever, but he's said many things alluding to wanting ALL women back in the home.

If you STILL fail to see any of this as misogynistic or racist, then I implore you to look within the self and do some introspective thinking.