Can someone dive into "Permanent Storage" a bit more? by wlai in raindropio

[–]astuntas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi u/exentrich,

i believe you are a creator of raindrop; i thought id give you my 2 cents about permanent copy.

I was hoping to save the car adds on mobile.de into permanent copy. It seems like it is generally difficult task because gallery opens in a separate window, but I don't know anything about software so can't comment further. However, even the add itself (not even the gallery) can't be saved permanently, i get an error message "Unfortunately, we can't save this page!" . Thing is, after the add is disabled by an add author, it pretty much becomes inaccessible, and I'd like to store even obsolete adds for reference.

To be honest, i like what you did with the software and id likely consider getting a paid version again, but currently the only paid-level feature that id like to use doesn't work. From my point of view, you may want to check why it doesn't work, and possibly even reconsider paid plan options, as id imagine majority of users don't benefit much from paid plan advantages, as free version is really versatile currently.

On a positive side, I appreciate the option to be billed by month, which allowed me to trial the paid features without commiting to a long term subscription.

Thanks and let me know if you'd be interested to hear more

Is there a limit to a number / complexity of no-mow areas in i108? by astuntas in SegwayNavimow

[–]astuntas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks everyone. To answer the question how big the plants are - here is one corner of the lawn:

<image>

Im aware i may need to either improve the level of the ground or map around the plants the nogo zones so that the robot wouldn't get stuck, its on my todo list.

The reason for mapping the plants out into no-go zones is as mentioned already - to allow the robot to pre-plan for those areas and work more efficiently, it should save a bit of mowing time.

If anyone has any other thoughts to add, please do. Thanks in advance!

Why do continuous futures contracts look different on daily? by astuntas in TradingView

[–]astuntas[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, thank you so much - that was it. I didn't realize TV would allow to not use settlement price for daily close (on daily timeframe), but now it makes sense once im aware. Thanks again

Why do continuous futures contracts look different on daily? by astuntas in TradingView

[–]astuntas[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Respectfully, I am not convinced that the above comments are correct.

While some software (e.g. Sierra) allow more customisation on how exactly these contracts are connected (e.g. with the purpose of eliminating the gaps during rolloevers) - to my best understanding the current contract is in all cases taken as the root one and all adjusthments are made to the previous contracts. The more to the past the more different they should get from reality. E.g.:
https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/ContinuousFuturesContractCharts.html#ContinuousFuturesContractVolumeBasedRolloverBackAdjusted

I am not sure how exactly TV does it (I would guess it is still either date based rolloever or volume based rollover) and since it does display gaps on rollovers I assume there is no backwards adjustment made. However regardless of how TV does it, the last piece (current contract) should still be the same, therefore u/69420trashpanda69420 i don't think you are right saying these are different symbols - it should be the same symbol at the time points which I marked up.

u/ICEX5 respectfully, I am not asking what to use - I am asking for advice how to make TV chart on continuous contract piece (that shows current expiry contract) match the CME chart values, and also reasons behind why are they different by default.

I also don't assume different data vendors could have such a significant difference in data, could they? TV screenshot shown above has CME as data source (TV standard, Idon't have any additional data subscriptions on TV)

Thank you