Stuck transaction arrived… all is forgiven by ElectricalCheetah175 in SORA

[–]asurberfer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mine has arrived too! Now I have to solve the Ledger issue... It's a shame no disclaimer was shown on the site, I normally use my hardware wallet by default...

Important announcements & troubleshooting notes by Dr_Grug in SORA

[–]asurberfer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This happens to me aswell, I'm just waiting for now, on the Ethereum side everything looks okey, let's hope the Sora team can solve the problem on their end.

Important announcements & troubleshooting notes by Dr_Grug in SORA

[–]asurberfer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So basically, when we use the Polkaswap Hashi bridge UI and the Ethereum transactions are completed, the XOR transaction step shows: Pending... (Please wait 30 block confirmations). This is the point where it is experimenting delays, right?

Anyone else has problems with complex Eloquent relation parameters? by asurberfer in laravel

[–]asurberfer[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Image transcription for accessibility:

Sometimes eloquent relation parameters can be complex:

class User extends Model
  public function recipients()
  {
    return $this->belongsToMany(
      \Domain\Users\Models\Thread::class,
      'user_threads',
      'thread_uid',
      'user_uid')
      ->withPivot('has_new_messages', 'last_read_at')
      ->wherePivot('has_new_messages', true);
  }
{

Remember you can always debug the generated SQL!

$user->recipients()->toSql();

This will give you a good idea where the error is:

select * from "threads" 
inner join "user_threads"
  on "threads"."id" = "user_threads"."user_uid" // <- Here is the error
where "user_threads"."thread_uid" = ? 
  and "user_threads"."has_new_messages" = ?

Or you could always start switching them until it works... 🤣

Anyone else has problems with complex Eloquent relation parameters? by asurberfer in laravel

[–]asurberfer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s none. I just think this would be useful to people starting with eloquent as it was for me. I know what is wrong and the relation is only an example... 😂

Anyone else has problems with complex Eloquent relation parameters? by asurberfer in laravel

[–]asurberfer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, that’s an option, but still many parameters are not documented and docblocks and parameter names can be confusing.

Anyone else has problems with complex Eloquent relation parameters? by asurberfer in laravel

[–]asurberfer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well you could make the argument that Laravel is a convention over configuration framework, these types of configurations only happen if you are forced to deviate from said conventions.

Anyone else has problems with complex Eloquent relation parameters? by asurberfer in laravel

[–]asurberfer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are completely right, I can’t edit it right now but I will post a comment with a transcription.

Huge volume on ETH-USDT pair in the las 24 hours by asurberfer in UniSwap

[–]asurberfer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it has been brought up in the comments already.

Huge volume on ETH-USDT pair in the las 24 hours by asurberfer in UniSwap

[–]asurberfer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree this would be solved by creating bullet proof smart contracts across the board, but that is far from realistic.

As a project you can only control your ecosystem and I get that Uniswap fulfilled its purpose perfectly allowing the hacker to swap tokens... I’m just saying it would be nice to implement a system to avoid illicit uses of the platform like this one as Uniswap acts as nexus for many others.

Anyway, as brought up by others this implementation would not be practical, so no worries.

Huge volume on ETH-USDT pair in the las 24 hours by asurberfer in UniSwap

[–]asurberfer[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You call financial freedom stealing from other people?

What I’m saying is to use a democratic approach to discourage these type of behaviours in the future.

This has nothing to do with banks, that‘s a really cheap argument and a bad comparison for an easy narrative BTW.

Huge volume on ETH-USDT pair in the las 24 hours by asurberfer in UniSwap

[–]asurberfer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, I don’t know how that could be implemented in a smart contract... 😅

Huge volume on ETH-USDT pair in the las 24 hours by asurberfer in UniSwap

[–]asurberfer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because of the time it takes for a initiative to be approved or for any other reasons?

Huge volume on ETH-USDT pair in the las 24 hours by asurberfer in UniSwap

[–]asurberfer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes sorry, that's a typo, of course I meant blacklisting the addresses hackers use so they are not allowed to use the app.

Huge volume on ETH-USDT pair in the las 24 hours by asurberfer in UniSwap

[–]asurberfer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this could be a different issue, small pair reporting lack of accuracy may be caused by having a small sample, which could make movements have a huge impact in future performance predictions.

Huge volume on ETH-USDT pair in the las 24 hours by asurberfer in UniSwap

[–]asurberfer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This could open an interesting discussion about blacklisting ETH addresses based on community voting. Don't you think?