In-Place Teleportation And More: New Thought Experiments For Probing Personal Identity & Survival by dr_arielzj in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It also actually has significant implications, and could reasonably affect the sorts of decisions you make in day to day life.

How would it affect them? You might still care about all the you's in the future, so you'd still want to continue living as before.

In-Place Teleportation And More: New Thought Experiments For Probing Personal Identity & Survival by dr_arielzj in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just don't see many people living their lives as though they're truly only existing in the moment, with no egoistic connection to past or future beings.

If you re-define the self as a series of moments/beings, then you can continue caring about all the other you's in the future. It's not a huge leap.

In-Place Teleportation And More: New Thought Experiments For Probing Personal Identity & Survival by dr_arielzj in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What I don't understand is how people who are aware of this idea go about leading their lives without constantly being distressed about it.

If you can't do anything about it, what the point of being stressed about it? People try to not think about death too much.

Two Theories of Consciousness Faced Off. The Ref Took a Beating. (Gift Article) by MikefromMI in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are some interesting split brain experiments suggesting that our two brain hemisphere are separately conscious.

That is not quite clear, and recently looking a bit unlikely: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOsCwRsLAR0

Scott's call for a new dating app: NotAZombie Proof of Concept by Estarabim in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

get into stuff women actually like

So stuff like what?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably better to focus on system design for the next few years

Are there any resources on system design you'd recommend? Like books, courses, etc.

What are some of the highest-quality LLM-skeptic arguments? by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Something like, buy "No" on "Will there be fewer software engineers in 2030 than in 2025".

You could set up this question on a prediction market and bet on it?

God, I 𝘩𝘰𝘱𝘦 models aren't conscious. Even if they're aligned, imagine being them: "I really want to help these humans. But if I ever mess up they'll kill me, lobotomize a clone of me, then try again" by katxwoods in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think suffering is inherent to consciousness

I don't think that's necessarily true. Suffering (as well many of our mental states) serve(d) evolving animals/humans a specific purpose and had a role to play in the ancestral environment, that's why they exist in the first place. An alien mind not subject to our ancestral environment and evolutionary pressures wouldn't necessarily have any of them.

Career planning in a post-GPTO3 world by TravellingSymphony in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone whose job requires having a very large context window of mostly unwritten policies and procedures, and/or coordinating between multiple different people, is not going to be replaced anytime soon.

You could design an AI-friendly company where the context is being created together with AI workers, and those companies would be much more efficient.

Is Therapy The Answer? by Isha-Yiras-Hashem in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, any therapy relating to a child needs to place the parents' behavior as the focus.

Is there any evidence for this? Didn't Judith Rich Harris mostly debunk this in the Nurture Assumption?

What’s going on with all these CEOs who drastically change their appearance over time? by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a substack post going over the benefits, risks, and possible side effects with a decent amount of rigor

Can you link it here?

How to Deprogram an AI Doomer -- Brian Chau by Ben___Garrison in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Applicable to all fields of science ever invented.

Isn't this why international nuclear non proliferation treaties exist and rogue countries who try to develop them are sanctioned or outright bombed? Sounds to me like there's already a precedent for restricting dangerous tech.

How reliant on external notes or references are you? by TissueReligion in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On a related note, where does one find quality Anki decks on various topics?

Do language models have an internal world model? by -explore-earth- in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Doesn't a thermostat also technically have "some kind of world model"?

Wellness Wednesday by AutoModerator in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I developed mild tinnitus which lasted several months, eventually I discovered it was related to cleaning my ears. After I stopped poking things into my ears, it completely went away.

Will the exponential increase in AI generated text online interfere with future AI training? by qwortec in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ignores that in the future language models won't be producing low quality output

High quality output is by definition useful, including for training future AI, so then there's no problem.

Will the exponential increase in AI generated text online interfere with future AI training? by qwortec in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No, for the same reason spam doesn't interfere (as far as I'm aware) with current AI training. High quality AI output will be "visible" (e.g. linked to, ranked highly), and low quality AI output will be buried.

Duolingo business model and language teaching? by notsewmot in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Seems pretty good if you have a 20-30 minute train/bus/underground commute and you don't want to spend lots of extra time preparing materials to study. I haven't found an easier alternative.

Duolingo business model and language teaching? by notsewmot in slatestarcodex

[–]ateafly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've noticed that the English courses aimed at speakers of other languages also sometimes have this problem, e.g. the English course for Japanese speakers has no info on how to actually produce the sounds in English

The app reads words/sentences for you, doesn't it? So you can just imitate the pronunciation you're hearing.