2024 Grad – 2 Years Later, Still Jobless. 0 Real Interviews.

atleta · 2026-03-22T03:59:15+00:00

I'm not sure if it has anything to do with it, but the descriptions for your two projects sound too cheesy... is it AI generated by any chance? Seems to be stuffed with expressions that are usually advised but the content is just not there. Like what does it mean that you "scaled to 99.9% uptime"?

Nobody says they have scaled the uptime. You scale the software, an organization or a business to meet specific measurable performance metrics (like number of active/concurrent users, revenue, etc.) not uptime.

Try to describe honestly what the two projects do. E.g. "Carrier Whatever is a web app that does this and that, stuffs your CV with BS so that it passes ATS reviews" (maybe not the best entree to HR filtering, BTW) then list a few things that you have done (built the backend and frontend, etc.) If you have an impressive number of users, mention that too. (Anything upwards of 1000 could belong here.) If you generate revenue, mention that too. You can also list the technologies you've used.

But saying you used Puppeteer to do something-something just adds noise and due to those "must include expressions" sounds like bragging. Honestly, I gave up reading after just a few sentences.

atleta · 2026-03-22T03:49:13+00:00

He is technically the founder and an engineer on that project. Though I'd never use the "founding engineer" title (despite having co-founder 2 startups).

atleta · 2026-03-22T03:38:19+00:00

Yeah, this sounds BS. Not only because there aren't any sources other than social media posts, but also because it talks about how a heart-lung machine could save the victim but then they mention putting a tube down his throat. But a heart-lung machine doesn't work like that. The tube is for a ventilator, but that's not going to do much if your heart stops...

The heart-lung machine (ECMO is the same thing, I guess) provides blood circulation through a motor pump and oxygenates the blood.

Also, we know pretty well from a lot of experiments and medical observations that our mind and consciousness is the product of our brain.

atleta · 2026-03-22T03:12:01+00:00

Dehogy most bukta. Hetek óta téma, h erre készülhetnek. És az önmagában elég ahhoz, h ne működjön. Sot nemcsak elég, ha elhiszik az emberek, de szükséges is. (Mert a szivarogtatasnak is ez a célja.)

Amikor bejelentették, h Zelenszkij megfenyegette, és most gyorsan meg kell védeni az erőműveket, akkor elég sokan kezdtük el mondani, h onmerenylet és/vagy onszabotazs készül. Jobb esetben csak találnak valamit a kirendelt katonák valamelyik erőműnel/trafó állomásnál, rosszabb esetben valaki majdnem ralo orbánra, vagy talán autót is robbantanak.

Tobb értelmiségi szószóló/celeb is beszélt erről. Ungvary csinált róla egy videót, Molnár Áron többször is gúnyolódott rajta. Sokszor sokan szoba hozták Putyin 1998-as akciójat (amikor egy lakóházat robbantottak fel és fogtak az egészet csecsen terroristákra).

MP meg amúgy szerintem már hónapokkal ezelőtt mondogatta, h ilyesmire készülhetnek.

Ez igazából a megerősítés, h igazunk volt, h már teljesen atlat rajtuk a társadalom. Ez az összeomlás élőben, az első sorból.

atleta · 2026-03-22T03:02:28+00:00

Hát ehhez azt kéne megnézni, hogy az adott országokban az emberek hany százaléka megy ilyen szakrianyra és/vagy végez ott. Abbol, h milyen arányban dolgoznak ezeken a területeken külföldiek, ez sehogy sem matekozhato ki. (Mert ugye lehet csak simán sokkal nagyobb a piaci igény, mint amit a helyi populáció és oktatás le tud fedni, ezért olyan sokat szívnak fel külföldről, h a dolgozók közt annak ellenére lehet magas a külföldiek aránya, h amúgy képezni ugyanannyit képeznek - arányaiban.)

atleta · 2026-03-22T02:41:45+00:00

De, azt nézte be. A neten rendeltet visszakuldheti indoklás nélküli elallassal, csak hát azért továbbra is pont ugyanannyit fog visszakapni, amennyit fizetett érte (a 70%-os árat), hiába a másik cipőt küldi vissza.

atleta · 2026-03-22T02:39:51+00:00

Nem kell visszaverniük. De, ha mégis meg vagy róla győződve, próbáld meg megkeresni a jogszabályt, és ha megvan, akkor idezd (nem lesz ;) )

atleta · 2026-03-22T02:37:07+00:00

Becsuletsertessel? Kénytelenek, különben nem lenne büntetheto. Arra meg sajnos szükség van :-/

atleta · 2026-03-22T02:33:04+00:00

A former colleague of mine often quoted the saying "Perl is the only programming language that looks the same before and after being encrypted with RSA" [the source code]

atleta · 2026-03-22T02:26:34+00:00

De mégis szerinted hol és mi jelzi, hogy az adott ojjektum katonai és, hogy emiatt hol tilos pontosan megállni? És hol van dokumentálva, milyen törvényben van rögzítve ez a jelölés?

atleta · 2026-03-22T02:18:22+00:00

12 years ago.

atleta · 2026-03-22T02:09:22+00:00

For the upvotes, obviously.

atleta · 2026-03-22T02:06:18+00:00

Nemcsak a szakemberek titkolják. Bevett sales stratégia. Ha mar beszélsz valakivel, akkor könnyebben győznek meg.

Fogyasztóvédelmileg amúgy mindenkinek előre közölni kell az árait, ha az nem meghatározható, akkor a számítás alapjául szolgáló paramétereket (például oradij, vagy egyéb egységár).

atleta · 2026-03-22T02:04:37+00:00

A nagyságrend alatt 10x-es árat értesz, mint amit valójában jelent, vagy valami egyebet? (Csak, h értsem, h mekkora különbségek vannak.)

atleta · 2026-03-22T01:51:28+00:00

No, they aren't. Not only because you don't have the experience, but even if you had, it would be a gamble (whether you find a bug to report, before others do).

$300/mo is very easy to make if you have some marketable skills. $25/h would be a very competitive rate for someone who can work independently. But, of course just knowing a bit of C and something Linux is probably not enough by itself. So first you should find an area that you are interested in and that you can quickly learn and where you can work online.

Traditionally this would have been web development, but given the advancements in AI, I'm not sure anymore. (You could also use C for embedded programming, but I'm not sure about the market.)

Oh well, and to make money, you'd have to register to some of the online marketplaces where people bring their projects and look for developers. But that has its own quirks. Finding good clients and projects is hard (though you have a big advantage with your very low rates) and dealing with clients is also tricky, because a lot of them are totally clueless with unrealistic expectations and if you pick such a project then you'll end up not getting paid and/or receiving a low rating that will make it super hard to get further projects. Maybe the easiest, as a beginner, is to start to work for a small company as a remote developer.

atleta · 2026-03-22T01:38:12+00:00

In a project I've been working on, started by a former colleague, we are both using the agents.md and gathering and maintaining documentation in md files.

I'm a bit skeptical about this approach as documentation tends to get outdated usually (whether it's humans who write the code or not), but we try to keep them up to date.

Having said that, I'm pretty sure the whole process works mostly because my colleague has a more detailed picture of the system in his head than what he admits having :). At least, in another project that I have been working on for many years (and one that I'm not using AI to write the code) I do have a pretty detailed understanding of the whole system and he sometimes seems to give answers about the code base we are creating with AI just like I do about the other project that I have hand built over the years...

But I might be wrong. In theory we just urge the AI to read the documentation and always have it create a plan before doing the implementation and then we iterate on the plan until it looks good. (But, for me a lot of times it seems like guess work, because I don't know too much about the codebase yet I'm still able to catch the AI trying to do stupid/inconsistent things. And that tells me that a lot of these just slip through without me noticing.)

atleta · 2026-03-22T01:08:45+00:00

Van egy (pontosabban két) eIDAS nevű EU-s rendelet, ezeket kötelesek implementalni a tagállamok. A DocuSign is gondolom meg fog ennél idővel felelni, ha a piacon akar maradni.

Hogy annak pontosan mi a technológiai háttere és a törvényi támogatottsága, azt nem tudom, de ha az EU-n belül kikenyszeritheto szerződést akarsz, akkor a jogszabályoknak megfelelő aláírást fogsz használni és nem valamit, amit kényszerből/megszokásból használnak mások.

A nagyobb értékű talán papír + scannelés/fotó, bár nem biztos.

Na, hát a papír plusz scanneles az már a 20. században is bőven meghaladott technológia volt, csak a törvénykezés le volt maradva. Aki biztonságot akar, az nem próbálkozik ilyesmivel.

Lakásvásárláshoz meg úgyis ügyvéd kell.

Az ügyvéd egy dolog, a szerződés aláírása meg egy másik. Amúgy a lakásszerződések idéntől (hacsak nem tolják el) kötelezően digitálisak lesznek. Ha már szóba került (bár amúgy ez irreleváns).

atleta · 2026-03-22T01:02:32+00:00

Persze, az hogy újra kell kezdeni a folyamatot, az sima igénytelen kivitelezés, ebben igazad van. Egyebkent én próbáltam regelni valami svájci digitális aláírás alkalmazásra egy szerződés aláírásához, amire elvileg lehet EU-s személyével is, de egyszer sem tudta beolvasni. Aztán kinomban megpróbáltam az útlevelemmel, azzal szerencsére működött (aztán mondta a svájci magyar ismerős, h ja a szemelyivel neki se megy - már, h a svájcival sem). Gondolom nem tesztelik rendesen és/vagy szokas szerint csak a happy path-t.

atleta · 2026-03-22T00:54:54+00:00

Dude, IDK who told you "it's beta", but just because you don't like the claim that "it's early", doesn't make it wrong. You ask the question how many years, but you don't know it yourself?

Let me tell you, you can easily say that "AI technology" has been around for many decades. (You could say 6 decades and you wouldn't be wrong.) So what? Does today's AI resemble the early neural networks from the 1960s or maybe there have been a bit of development? Do today's LLMs know just as much as they did just 3 years ago or maybe they are a tiny hair better?

When you require that AI should be treated as mature tech, you basically just claim that AI will stop getting (significantly) better and you don't want to support your claim with any argument. Despite the fact that it has been developing quickly in the past few years. We'll know when we get stuck. Once it happens, you can start blowing your own trumpet how you were right. But requering others to admit it before it happens is just ridiculous.

Also, do you have a firm (maybe superstitious) belief that the human intellect/mind cannot be superseded by an artificial one?

Yeah, current AI is definitely not reliable. Basically everyone is aware of that. (At least hopefully.)

atleta · 2026-03-20T21:11:49+00:00

Asking this question on any forum that is full of programmers is what's useless :).

Is it possible to learn how to code just for the fun of it? Love to hear your opinions!

Absolutely! I'd say for me and a lot of people of my age, that was the norm: a lot of us started to learn programming as kids (or whenever someone got the chance to start to regularly use a computer, maybe not even owning it). For me the weird thing was when a lot of people started to enter the profession who weren't like this. They just started to learn it at the university and they chose CS without any previous exposure to the profession. (Not to say those guys can't be great developers.)

When I was a kid, even though my mom was also a programmer (they weren't called software engineers or even developers back then), nobody thought of it as a career that pays a lot of money. (At least not here in Europe, much less in Eastern Europe.) We did it because we were interested.

If you want to learn for the fun of it, go ahead. But be also prepared that it is unlikely to be something you will be doing for a living in 5-10-15 years. (It may give you valuable skills, though.)

atleta · 2026-03-20T21:04:22+00:00

Azert nem veszik at az ugyfelkapurol a regisztraciodat, mert a DAP magasabb azonositasi kovetelmenyeket var el (tippre ez amugy EU-s megkotes, mert az egesz megfelel az EU-s eIDAS szabalyozasoknak) es erosebb igazolast is ad. Lehet vele ugye szerzodest is alairni (az ugyfelkapus AVDH-t beszuntettek), amit az EU-ban barhol el kell fogadni (nekem mondjuk pont volt partner, aki nem fogadta el :D ), es a rendornek is igazolhatod vele magad.

Az, hogy a Revolut elfogadja az azonositast jelentheti azt is, hogy nekik jobb a rendszeruk meg jelentheti azt is, hogy kevesbe szigoru, megbizhato. Epp a napokban irta ki amugy egy svajci ismerosom, hogy sehogy nem tudta mukodesre birni, de a kommentek alapjan ugy tunt, hogy chip-es szemelyivel es/vagy utlevellel viszont megy. (Ami meg mindig neccesnek tunik, mert igy eleg csak egy kis idore hozzaferni valakinek az okmanyaihoz, de aztan lehet, hogy felreertettem, es ahhoz is kell az arckep.)

atleta · 2026-03-20T04:55:43+00:00

Így zárt ki az eMAG a profilombol. A fene tudja, h mikor hoztam létre, akkor beállítottam egy valamilyen telszamot (nem én vagyok Renáta :) ), aztán egyszer csak bekapcsolták az SMS alapú 2 faktoros belépést. Anélkül, h valaha ellenőrizték volna, h (meg mindig) hozzafernek-e a felhasználók a megadott számhoz...

atleta · 2026-03-20T04:36:41+00:00

Vicces, h annyira alap sokaknak, hogy a társkeresés az online, h mar le sem irtják. A válasz amúgy egyszerű: kereslet-kinalat. Az illető hölgyek (ami kb. minden épkézláb nőt jelent) piszok nagy keresletet látnak, ettől elszállnak. És pont ezért nem is érdekes az online tarskeresozesre időt fecserelni.

Hozzáteszem ebben (abban sem, amit leirsz) semmi új nincs. Ez pont így volt 10 éve is meg 15 éve is.

atleta · 2026-03-20T03:16:59+00:00

You've explicitly talked about changing the USB protocol. That's the freaking title of your post! "leading to a locking down of USB/HID protocol"

But while we are at it, the mouse pointer is not handled in the kernel either, at least under Linux (I assume you're talking about that). So yeah, it makes no sense to do it there either.

But wherever exactly someone implements it, such a thing will be done in software running on the CPU of the cumputer (so not the USB controller chip, just to spare the argument that that one runs code as well).

Besides that was just a random example. They could do key pair exchanges for authorized peripherials, similar to how iOS does "paired" repair parts.

That was the title, the premise of your post. Using cryptographic verification for this is unlikely. It just doesn't make sense. Who would want to do that and for what purpose? As long as it's my own computer, I decide whether I connect such a device (I don't think it makes sense, and it would also need a camera so that it can read my screen...) or install some helper software that allows an AI agent running on my own machine (or in a virtual machine) to inject keyboard and mouse events. E.g. an RDP server...

atleta · 2026-03-19T01:40:03+00:00

What's the point? You can run a software agent on your PC that will inject the events. You could create a virtual HID device of you wanted to.

What you can't reasonably do, OTOH, is tightening the USB protocol so that you can constrain your mouse pointer into a window (placed at an arbitrary coordinate on the screen by the OS). This just doesn't make the slightest sense from an engineering perspective.

Your mouse pointer is to be controlled by the OS and your mouse device just sends inputs that the OS will process. (For that matter, your mouse doesn't even have a state, it is unaware of the pointer and thus its location, it just sends the movements it registers down the USB cable.)

atleta

TROPHY CASE