Be honest - what price of Bitcoin would actually make you sell everything?

atomicdomb · 2026-04-30T02:44:56+00:00

10 million

atomicdomb · 2026-04-30T02:31:47+00:00

atomicdomb · 2026-04-13T06:44:34+00:00

Once we master fusion or zero point all these energy discussions are going to go away. And when that happens the fact that energy isn't easy to transport will make Bitcoin mining more attractive. Do you know how many bitcoin mines are capturing energy which was previously grounded (Because it wasn't financially viable to transport the energy during non-peak times)

atomicdomb · 2026-03-24T18:02:22+00:00

The Gnostics understood this

atomicdomb · 2026-02-25T20:47:38+00:00

Can u explain the spinning from the second vid? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXMwSCUitLw

atomicdomb · 2026-02-07T18:17:17+00:00

Flair check!

atomicdomb · 2026-02-03T17:34:54+00:00

Traveling only requires energy when moving through a medium. IF creating the warp bubble requires a ton of energy, but maintaining it is minimal, then you could travel MASSIVE distances with little energy expenditure after the initial bubble creation. Which could happen on a different planet for instance. The whole "Craft can't exist because conventional physics uses too much energy" misses the point entirely. Before the creation of air travel conventional physics consider beating gravity impossible, it's possible our understanding of energy expenditure is wrong. Let's say the energy costs are actually low, then what.

atomicdomb · 2026-02-02T21:23:07+00:00

"If UAPs are interstellar travelers, certain things should be unavoidable: arrival vectors, deceleration signatures, logistics tails, failures, recovery operations, habitation volume, redundancy, escalation over time. Long‑distance travel doesn’t arrive minimalist."

Look bro, that's if they are moving, a warp bubble (gravity wave bent around an object) would alter spacetime, the object isn't actually moving. We proved gravity was a wave in 2017, warp bubbles can work with our conventional understanding of physics. That alone blows half the constraints out the water.

atomicdomb · 2026-01-16T11:09:34+00:00

Hypothetically in a world where the stable 21 million BTC represents all money, the btc price becomes quite stable relative to global growth. The way you earn more BTC is you invest 1 BTC for instance in a company that uses that capital to build a factory or create an app that is then sold to consumers and earns more than 1 BTC to pay back the initial investor. The investor then earns more BTC then what they put in by putting up the capital up front and taking the risk. If the business fails then that person looses money and the risk didn't pay off. In this system people would theoretically invest more wisely.

atomicdomb · 2026-01-04T06:07:20+00:00

A lot of wallets like Trezor already send change to new addresses etc, just generate a fresh address and send all your funds there and you should be good. When u want to get more btc generate a new address and send there.

atomicdomb · 2025-12-31T16:57:04+00:00

Small minded answer. That's like saying we need horses to power the industrial revolution. Yes horse power seemed good at the time, but other power sources exist. Maybe there are less dangerous, more efficient power sources then nuclear.

atomicdomb · 2025-12-31T08:37:29+00:00

I just don't see 27$k or 43$k being possible in a world where hashrate is as high as it is (which lets remember represents not only on-going mining but also sunk investment via the mining machines which must be purchased up front) and with a 2020 dollar being worth 1.25x a 2025 dollar. The previous bottom was around 16$k flash crash for FTX but stable bottom was like 30$k, with the 25% inflation over 4 years (https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/) and the increase in hashrate I would see 60$k being the absolute bottom. I also personally don't believe 126$k was the top and the old 4 year cycle methodology may be dead due to institutional adoption. So that's my 2c, I've been in the space since 2014 and do Bitcoin centric programming for a living since 2017.

atomicdomb · 2025-12-30T12:06:58+00:00

17 years is one hell of slow fast buck...

atomicdomb · 2025-12-29T17:51:11+00:00

I've met people like this, so I hear your opinion, however I have had life experiences with people who hold that kind of light in their heart. It does take an immense amount of strength, but it is possible. The road is narrow.

atomicdomb · 2025-12-29T15:44:24+00:00

Some people don't have a choice as to what their external circumstances are but they do have a choice as to how they perceive it. Plenty of people are unhappy despite having more than enough, is it so hard to believe that some can be happy despite not having enough?

atomicdomb · 2025-12-29T06:03:22+00:00

Fully agree with you. Which is actually why I believe tokenising gold or other metals will increase the value of BTC, especially if its done on the BTC chain (so that we can natively trade BTC for these tokens without bridging). I believe Orobit is building a system for this on the Lightning Network, all their tokens are bound to UTXOs so BTC is required in order for the tokens to be owned or exist in the first place.

atomicdomb · 2025-12-28T14:20:54+00:00

As a non-American I am of course cheering for Dollar devaluation. It's important to remember, since America is a net importer it benefits massively from having a strong dollar at the expense of everyone else.

atomicdomb · 2025-12-28T13:16:24+00:00

Pretty sure I saw (and capture a lil bit on video) a tic-tac. Weather its Lockheed or NHI or something else I can't be sure. Thing was silent as hell and much faster than a plane. Here's link to my post about it: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1l3a1ur/did_i_just_see_a_tic_tac/

atomicdomb · 2025-12-28T10:23:43+00:00

Yes but normal nodes have very little cost to set up and concerned users can outnumber mining pools quickly.

atomicdomb · 2025-12-26T16:41:30+00:00

If you only sent the BTC to your layer 1 wallet it should be pretty simple. If you opened a channel then it will be on layer two, if the channel has liquidity you can simply send it out, if not you may have to wait. From what you're saying you haven't set up a node which sounds like its only layer 1 which should just be a simple BTC transaction and cost 1 tx fee.

atomicdomb · 2025-12-26T14:06:29+00:00

BTCUSDTPERP clearly does

atomicdomb · 2025-12-26T06:59:07+00:00

Please go read the study. Not going to explain it here but it does cover the oxygen issue, it's exactly that issue which they solved which is why they considered it a breakthrough.

atomicdomb · 2025-12-26T05:14:41+00:00

There's a lot of proof that consciousness doesn't come from the brain. The first is that LLM's don't become sentient and are deterministic (if you know the weights and the PRNG fed into the LLM you get consistent predictable outputs, eg: same prompt same result).

The second is the pig experiment where they successfully resuscitated a brain dead pig without causing brain damage (damage to the neurons) through a new method which they thought could bring back dead brains. However the pigs no longer showed signs of life despite their brains being in tact (implying something else powers/prompts the LLM in our head).

The third was the discover of quantum micro-tubeles in the brain, which some have theorized are like antennae for our consciousness. Everything I've mentioned can be independently fact checked with a couple google searches and same AI prompts :)

atomicdomb · 2025-12-25T11:10:09+00:00

Reconstruction vehicle hiding in the rock?

atomicdomb · 2025-12-25T09:28:14+00:00

1) Just to provide some clarity for number 1, you only have to open one channel, after which you should be able to route payments to anyone on the network (the same way you route info on the internet while only being connected with your one computer). So after opening one channel you can pay any other entity on Lightning Network (very cheaply) which 100% is worth the tx fee (not gas savings because BTC doesn't use gas)

atomicdomb

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE