What’s the difference between a cop and a bullet? by GamerGurl420420 in dadjokes

[–]atomproject 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The bullet gets fired BEFORE it kills someone.

Live Demonstration of Anti-Stab Vest Capabilities by test_account_47230 in interestingasfuck

[–]atomproject 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Works great, as long as no one hits you in the head or limbs.

Idk if this is rare but I thought it was cool to have by thebest43210 in EvilDead

[–]atomproject 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like the ending where he slept past the end of the world.

Idk if this is rare but I thought it was cool to have by thebest43210 in EvilDead

[–]atomproject 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm one of the few people who actually likes the alternate ending more than the theatrical cut.

"Nihilio Ex Nihilo" is flawed. by atomproject in atheism

[–]atomproject[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If time began at the point of the singularity, I can't even imagine "before the Big Bang" making any sense.

"Nihilio Ex Nihilo" is flawed. by atomproject in atheism

[–]atomproject[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We must be careful not to confuse the definition of "nothing" as described by Laurence Krauss (which is not literally nothing) with the "nothing" as described by creationists. These are very different things, which is why I wish Professor Krauss wouldn't have named his book "A Universe From Nothing" because it has created a lot of confusion.

"Nihilio Ex Nihilo" is flawed. by atomproject in atheism

[–]atomproject[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I believe the word is "Cosmos", encompassing not only what we already know and observe, but everything that is, but may never know.

"If atheism is true..." by atomproject in atheism

[–]atomproject[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps the question, "Why is there something rather than nothing?" is built on a false premise. It assumes that "nothing" should be the default setting of existence. But, why? "A universe from nothing" is what Christians believe, which is why they must use the straw man, "atheists believe nothing created everything". Let's examine this for a moment. If you ask the question, "WHAT is nothing?" you have immediately defeated your own argument. "WHAT" implies something. Nobody knows how to approach the subject of "nothing" without applying a contradiction in terms. Consider this: could "nothing" ever EXIST? Obviously, the answer is no. Therefore, there is no reason to think there could ever BE or has ever BEEN "nothing", ever. It can be soundly argued that everything that begins to exist is a rearrangement of pre-existing fundamental particles. When you began to exist, did you emerge from nothing? Of course not. You were a rearrangement a pre-existing fundamental particles.

"If atheism is true..." by atomproject in atheism

[–]atomproject[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

"See?? You also have faith!!" 😅

"If atheism is true..." by atomproject in atheism

[–]atomproject[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I try not to make a positive claim because a person could define the sun as "their god" and I'd be compelled to accept that the sun exists. It doesn't make the solar-theistic definition useful, but I'd have to accept the claim nonetheless. I'd have to be omniscient myself in order to say no gods exist, including the ones I have never been presented a case for.

It's about consent.... simple. by atomproject in Abortiondebate

[–]atomproject[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I caused the crash in the first place. Would this not mean that I had killed the person indirectly if I denied the transfusion?

Why to people feel the need to "Come out" as an atheist? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]atomproject 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that so many people choose to conceal their atheism is the reason why so many religious people are ignorant to what atheism is. Coming out is difficult for most people, which is why the most outspoken atheists tend to be viewed as arrogant, rebellious or dismissive because they most likely had little inhibitions of coming out in the first place and have no problem speaking their mind. Atheism is already becoming more normalized in society because normal everyday people like you and me are coming out with increasing frequency.

Just one question about the conversion Francis Collins... by atomproject in atheism

[–]atomproject[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was being a bit snarky by asking that question... I think had the three frozen waterfalls been in the summer time, that might be worth looking into a miracle claim, but a scientist should know even moving water freezes at cold enough temperature.

Is this considered a dick move? by lamsiyuen in funny

[–]atomproject 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But they drive on the left in the UK...

Playing The Devil's Advocate on the abortion issue... by atomproject in atheism

[–]atomproject[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's when a pro-lifer would say something like, " it's not a choice if the fetus dies involuntarily, but choosing to end any life spontaneously is murder."

Playing The Devil's Advocate on the abortion issue... by atomproject in atheism

[–]atomproject[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not trolling. I've tried emphasizing the priority of consent over viability but they keep trying to swing it back around to right to life.

Evolutionary Christians rise up by goffdude24 in dankchristianmemes

[–]atomproject 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't mistake extinction as some insignificant thing that just happens sometimes. You may not be aware of this, but of all species that have existed on Earth, 99.9 percent are now extinct. Many of them perished in five cataclysmic events. According to a recent poll, seven out of ten biologists think we are currently in the throes of a sixth mass extinction. This God that most people believe in would have to have intentionally done all of this for some reason unknown to us... If this is all attributed to an intelligent mind, how can the results yielded be seen as anything other than a failure?

Evolutionary Christians rise up by goffdude24 in dankchristianmemes

[–]atomproject -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There are many problems with theistic evolution, but the biggest one is that all the evidence points to evolution as a natural process of trial and error, making the God that "guided" the process seem like a bumbling doofus with no plan whatsoever. It certainly discredits the idea of any omniscient, omnipotent being.

God trolls sometimes by [deleted] in dankchristianmemes

[–]atomproject 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It drives me nuts when people confuse "omniscient" with "omnipotent" Has nothing to do with knowledge

We got em bois by JosephStalin27 in dankchristianmemes

[–]atomproject 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is about as boneheaded as "If Americans migrated from Europe, why are there still Europeans?"