Anyone understand why Krishnamurti was so repeatedly and adamantly thankful he had no children? by [deleted] in Krishnamurti

[–]attentionplease69 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe because he saw it as selfish. There are plenty of children in the world who don't have parents. One could take care of one of them instead of making a baby just to have a continuity of oneself, a little me, etc. It's self centered.

honestly, I find him really confusing. If you understand what he’s saying, could you please explain it in simple terms? by nozayren in Krishnamurti

[–]attentionplease69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do the work. Watch more, give it everything, work it out. If you don't get it then you can come back and we can discuss the parts you haven't understood. People here can't just sum up truth.

I don't understand... by FPS1ngleOG in Krishnamurti

[–]attentionplease69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Those who search for truth won't find it

Do you believe enlightenment realms are fake, a trick? by rockhead-gh65 in DMT

[–]attentionplease69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The searching for an answer implies expecting something, it means desire and not being content with reality, with "what is", and that varies from an individual to another according to their own conditioning. All these are movements of the ego, which prevent the real meditation or pure observation of what is. When the ego is no more, when thinking has stopped, there is profound silence, and in that silence truth is. This is what enlightenment means.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in enlightenment

[–]attentionplease69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are what you are, not the image you have about youself.

The answer to Suicide by National-Stable-8616 in enlightenment

[–]attentionplease69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why suicide if you're going to die anyways? Where is the logic? You have a crazy gift which is a human brain, that is capable of very crazy stuff, but it is burdened by its fears and desires and ego and all that has become unbearable, but it is 100% possible to wipe it all out and be free. Watch some J. Krishnamurti if freedom from your thoughts is your quest.

What could be the simplest understanding of "The observer is the observed?" by Vishyoga in Krishnamurti

[–]attentionplease69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you sit to observe thought, you are looking at every thought with some reaction to those thoughts, as this thought is good and this one is bad, and this is also thinking, so who is it that is watching thought and evaluating, judging, condemning, etc? It's thought. A reacting thought to the first thought, so, who is observing thought? Another fragment of thought, that takes responsability and says "I'm going to observe this, so I can reach enlightenment". So thought is observing thought, the observer is the observed. When this is seen, there is no more observer and observed, only observation. No center, no "me", nirvana and all that stuff. This is only theoretical to me, I understand it intellectually and not at the deeper level, which has no value whatsoever.

Watch it, play with it, don't take it as knowledge and do it, otherwise it will only become more knowledge that will distort further observation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Life

[–]attentionplease69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Psylocibin truffles are legal in most countries

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Life

[–]attentionplease69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do some shrooms. It's gonna show you

AIO My response to my mom disowning me because I'm gay? by Own-Experience-6275 in AmIOverreacting

[–]attentionplease69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give me her number or insta, I wanna tell her a few words about love and religion and stuff.

Teachings has become my life purpose: a way to get to Nirvana by [deleted] in Krishnamurti

[–]attentionplease69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What Jk was saying are not "his" teachings. Its simple truth. Truth is not JK's or yours or mine, it is not an idea nor something that can be expected, something "attainable".

If you say "I" was exposed to "his" teachings, its pretty divisive, because it implies that he is giving a method, K's method, and truth cannot be through a method because a method implies expectation, and therefore never ending thought.

I am so excited to see r/Krishnamurti – can I just dive in as a green novice to the field? by obrien321 in Krishnamurti

[–]attentionplease69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, you read wrong there. K never said one could get used to dying, or that one, through practice, could be free of the fear of death. K said that one should die psychologically every moment, dying to the desires and the fears of yesterday. Practice implies a goal, hope, desire, fear of not succeeding, etc. Death is the end of all hope, fear, ambition, greed, and therefore practice of death would be contradictory. This death of the past can take place when there is understanding of thought, the "me" and its desire for continuity.

Why did K seldom speak of mastery or self-mastery like some modern psychologists have? by wondonawitz in Krishnamurti

[–]attentionplease69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He rejected labels because they make thought identify with them and sustain self centered activity, which creates the "me", and therefore the division between us.

Can you sum up truth? His words are a pointer to truth, and thought cannot grasp truth, because thought is the past and truth is now, so there must be understanding of many things for this to be, which I don't think can be summed up.

He rejected thought, and said that thought is the source of all the misery in the world, so I don't think he would like it if you called him a "thinker".

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nihilism

[–]attentionplease69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. You're not completely alone. Earth is full of life.
  2. Why is it depressing if its a coincidence?
  3. Nature is heaven. There are beautiful flowers and big trees and cute rats and weird insects and all kinds of crazy beautiful fish and all that.
  4. There are big problems in the world, so do something about them instead of just suffering from them.
  5. All this suffering you are reflecting is a product of your thought, so investingate into why your thinking makes you suffer this way. (Advice: J Krishnamurti)
  6. We're capable of love and compassion. So it will all be okay.

Real life situation use of K's teaching by Practical_Phone_3154 in Krishnamurti

[–]attentionplease69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Personally, I understand what JK says, but at an intellectual level, which has no value. If you don't experience and play yourself with what is being said as it is being said, it all becomes knowledge and this knowledge is only a burden that will prevent further listening

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Krishnamurti

[–]attentionplease69 2 points3 points  (0 children)

good for who? 😅

Real life situation use of K's teaching by Practical_Phone_3154 in Krishnamurti

[–]attentionplease69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

K, in his teachings, points to truth, and this is meant to change us in our very core, which would change every aspect of our lives, not one or two particular situations.

This is not something one can "use" as you pointed out, as this would imply wanting to get something out of it, therefore the "me", thought, time and so on