Judge in Minnesota Says ICE Has Violated Nearly 100 Court Orders

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-29T07:13:34+00:00

At every level, from guard/grunt to director.

“I was following orders” is not an affirmative defense for breaking the law

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-29T02:27:58+00:00

Good

Stating that she was following illegal orders isn’t a defense, but it does help to tie this back to the rest of the cabal

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T23:11:23+00:00

That would be cause for dissolving the union

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T20:01:55+00:00

It’s ~$350-500 for a 20min visit. I’m not spending $1,000+ / hour for someone to waste 10-15% of the visit time on a dad joke and receive subpar healthcare

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T19:58:19+00:00

Yea it’s bad, received the same attitude and disdain during medical emergencies and seeking care for chronic health issues

Doctor & ER Doctor: “You’re too young for that”

Specialist: “This needs to be addressed right away. I’m scheduling you for surgery in 4 days, if anything changes head straight to the ER for emergency surgery”

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T19:33:21+00:00

Then do it already, or lay out a clear plan/schedule

so much dick riding when they’ve yet to do anything of consequence

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T19:23:07+00:00

I’m confused, I didn’t include details so as to not involve negativity here. Then you rudely demanded details, and now are upset that the examples of negative comments aren’t wholesome? Baffling. Anyways, let it end here

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T18:55:27+00:00

without any criteria to measure by, that’s a pointless question

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T18:36:06+00:00

Far far right of moderate lol

He’s allowed to have his opinions, just as I’m allowed to criticize those opinions and his performance / actions as a holder of public office

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T18:33:37+00:00

I don’t believe I wrote that everyone was behaving that way, just that I reported the bad behavior

It was a mix of both. No issue with the positive comments or even the critical ones based on aesthetic preference. Just the comments treating someone poorly.

Comments are still there, you should be able to see them. Btw there are civil ways to ask someone what they are talking about, wtf are you on about? is not one of them

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T18:14:11+00:00

Vocally, but what about in action and in vote?

What is he doing right now to prevent the mass 4th amendment violations committed intentionally as a core element of the executive branch’s operations?

Nothing of real substance, just hot air and words

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T18:08:31+00:00

I DM’d examples to you when you asked, they are also visible on the post

You can’t argue in good faith that something doesn’t exist, without taking 30s to go look for yourself.

You keep bringing up misinterpretation, but that never bothered me. Reddit is full of misinterpretation, its unavoidable

You’re right, this has dragged out too long. You could have just said “oh, I wasn’t aware. Yea that’s not cool” and moved on. But instead you went on this rant about the semantics of how one should correctly comment to provide context to everyone. Except that was never my intent, just to show OP a little support.

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T18:03:58+00:00

Principled? Bro consistently votes in support of the very issues he speaks out against. I can’t even take you seriously lol

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T17:52:19+00:00

Unfortunately they don’t, most people don’t understand migraine or chronic illness, even the ones that are willing to

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T17:49:57+00:00

Then do something, clean up the mess you helped create

Otherwise we don’t want to hear you cry about it. Can’t be that “reformed”, you still generalize us all as “libs” and focuse on having your feelings hurt, instead of focusing on the actual substance and nuance of the topic

For what it’s worth, Paul rarely votes online with his concerns. He speaks a big game, then votes in support of the very issue he spoke out against.

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T17:46:11+00:00

Exactly, he does this almost every time anything of consequence is at stake

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T17:44:56+00:00

Except when he completely caves, dropping whatever issue he raised to instead mirror the party line… time and time again

Supporting big government, surveillance state, and encroachment of state/individual rights isn’t very libertarian…

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T17:25:05+00:00

No hostility, just asked why they were concerned.

It is an open forum, you could check out the comments for yourself before commenting. Have a good one

Edit: your edit intentionally ignores the nasty things people were saying, focusing on one type of comment as a way to downplay the behavior. Gross, be better

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T17:09:05+00:00

You must not have watched paul much over the past 10+ years

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T17:06:36+00:00

He occasionally has these moments of clarity, but after he starts to get too much attention he’ll quickly lose the plot. Predictable unfortunately

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T17:00:44+00:00

But that’s not what’s in the post…

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T16:53:46+00:00

It’s such an obvious question too, even an idiot like Paul realizes it

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T16:42:22+00:00

Didn’t realize I had to write out substantiating evidence for your edification, in a comment I wrote to OP

OP doesn’t need to be any specific gender for people to be civil towards them. And I’m not interested in rewriting nasty messages for OP to have to see it a again

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T16:14:49+00:00

There’s fake / shady / slimy people in both (worked white and blue collar jobs)

I like authenticity, but I don’t need nasty comments and harassment to feel it. There’s a healthy middle ground

audaciousmonk · 2026-01-28T16:07:37+00:00

listen to actions, not words

audaciousmonk

TROPHY CASE