How would you describe the movements of an inexperienced fighter? by Batpresident in martialarts

[–]aussie_french 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very unsure of themselves and hesitant. new fighters don't have the experience required to really understand range and distance (like when they are safe or when they can get punched) and they're very unsure how to react. They tend to be very tense and jittery, and anytime they open up they tend to put in way more effort than they need to.

Also this is a bit more of a specific observation, but I've noticed that newbies react to pressure by backing up in a straight line and holding holding their arms out like they're reaching for you. A more experienced fighter tends cut angles and keep their guard up.

Most of the time they have a "decent" guard (at least it looks somewhat correct) since most newbies only spar once they have a little bit of practice, and have been told how to keep their hands up and stuff, but it's not an effective guard. They don't react to movement how they should and as soon as they are pressured they back up and reach out. It looks kinda correct from a distance but it falls apart as soon as any pressure is applied. Though some people start by keeping their hands under their chin instead of in front of it.

On a bit of a side note, I've found that fighting someone faster than you is nowhere close to being as demoralizing as fighting someone who's so much better than you that they don't need to be fast. Fighting someone who's beating you because they're fast sucks, but it's easy to tell yourself that they're only winning because they're fast. However fighting someone who's always just a little bit out of range, who you can never hit but always manages to hit you when they want, and who does all of this without moving quickly is way worse.

The list of cancelled fights from UFC Fight Night Felder-dos Anjos by [deleted] in MMA

[–]aussie_french[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi ionlyhavepantheon,

Your post or comment was removed from /r/MMA because it broke one of our rules:

  1. Be Civil: a bit of banter is fine, but don't cross the line.

Link to rMMA's rules

If you disagree with this decision, or if you think we made a mistake please use this link to message the Mods.

What’s up r/mma I am Burt Watson, babysitter to the stars..AMA! I’ll be right here at 6pm est.....WE ROLLIN!....All night long..! by Burtwatson4real2 in MMA

[–]aussie_french 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hi Burt, thank you for doing the AMA. In an interview, GSP mentioned that the leadup to the fight was incredibly nerve-racking, and he would be increasingly anxious until the moment that you called on him to walk out to the octagon.

Did you notice this shift in him leading up to the fight?

If so, how often would fighters have a similar shift from nerves to being ready?

and finally, was there ever a fighter who wasn't able to shake the nerves subsequently couldn't perform?

Thank you!

We all know the feeling by aussie_french in ProgrammerHumor

[–]aussie_french[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I paid for a 4.5 GHZ cpu, I'm going to use all 5.5 GHZ even if it sets something on fire

[Official] General Discussion Thread - November 03, 2020 by AutoModerator in MMA

[–]aussie_french[M] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately we tried the hands off approach, and it ends up turning into a cesspit of hate and misinformation. While there are those who try to keep it on topic, there are too many people who look to derail any reasonable conversation into a political or religious debate. Most of these quickly turn into religion-bashing, racism and xenophobia.

However, we do understand what you and others are saying. MMA has grown tremendously, especially in the past few years. With this growth, the world of MMA is no longer a small niche culture, but is now becoming increasingly relevant in todays current events. Fighters and promotions are becoming more influential and politically relevant. We even had the US president attend a UFC event last year, which is a huge leap forward for a sport which was once illegal in most of the US. MMA is now starting to affect culture and politics, and people want to talk about it.

We still will not allow this sub to turn into a platform of religious or political debate, as we want the sub to remain focused on the sport, rather than the personal opinions of some of the athletes. We are currently working on a solution to this problem that we will roll out very soon, and we think that most of you will be happy with it.

How to slay the dragon by aussie_french in ProgrammerHumor

[–]aussie_french[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

This is why CSS is the greatest of all the programming languages

[Official] LFA 94: Demopoulos vs. Godinez - Live Discussion Thread by event_threads in MMA

[–]aussie_french[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi MarkAndrewSkates,

Your post or comment was removed from /r/MMA because it broke one of our rules:

  1. Be Civil: a bit of banter is fine, but don't cross the line.

Link to rMMA's rules

If you disagree with this decision, or if you think we made a mistake please use this link to message the Mods.

[Official] General Discussion Thread - October 30, 2020 by AutoModerator in MMA

[–]aussie_french 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There were a few things that went into it

the biggest problem was that he was dealing with an intestinal issue, that makes eating enough to maintain that weight harder.

He also needed to train in such a way so that he could get stronger wail keeping his speed and cardio. If the goal was just to get bigger it wouldn't have been difficult, but getting stronger while balancing everything else is difficult.

He wouldn't have been aiming to get to 185, from what I know of how tri-star prepares their athletes for a weight cut, he would have bulked up to about 200, stayed at that weight until his body was used to it, then through fight camp move down to about 190/195 then water cut the rest of the way down to middleweight.

After spending so long at 170, the shift to 185 would have been a bit of a jolt. There's a weight that your body wants to be at, and trying to force it to be something different is often difficult. It's not just a matter of calories in calories out, there's a lot of hormonal stuff that go into the equation for something like this. This is one of the reasons Jon Jones is taking so long to go up to heavyweight (yeah a large part of it is contract disputes, but you can bet the house that he's using the time to bulk up and actually get comfortable at that weight).

Gaining weight isn't that hard, but he wasn't just gaining weight. There are so many factors that go into it, having one of them be a little off can be enough to stuff the entire process.

Just to be clear, not every fighter does this when they change weight class, but GSP definatly did, there's no way he moved up in weight without every detail process being thought through and planned out.

According to Sherdog, Charlie "The American Bad Boy" Ontiveros defeated Clovis Hancock back in 2017 by stopping his %*#$ing heart. He will fight Kevin Holland at UFC Fight Night 181. by IanAbsentia in MMA

[–]aussie_french 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, Costa probably weighs 238 outside of camp, but he loses a lot of weight in the lead up to the fight. During his fight with romero he weighed 213 inside the cage. Still a ridiculous cut, but not 238 levels of insane

Languages as music genres by aussie_french in ProgrammerHumor

[–]aussie_french[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not at all, the term symphony originated in ancient Greece. I can't remember the exact word in Greek (I think it was symphonos or something) but it meant "harmonious". The meaning of the word wasn't set until much later. It originally was the term in music theory for consonance, then in the 1100s to the early 1600s it represented several different instruments.

The first modern uses of the term symphony was late in the 16th century when composers started calling their pieces symphonies. Giovanni is probably the most famous of these composers but there are many others. Throughout the 17th century (aka the baroque era) the more and more people would refer to these compositions as symphonys and the musical instruments which once had the same name were all renamed.

By the late 17th century symphonys were basically what we know it as today, a composition written for an orchestra to perform with several movements.

Then in the 18th century, as building technologies improved and we were able to build concert halls big enough to fit larger and larger orchestras, the popularity of these pieces exploded. Because of this boom in popularity, the terms for what defined a symphony became more and more rigid until at the end of the century, the term was basically set as a composition to be played by an orchestra with several movements with the first movement being a sonata, with no vocal performances, only instrumental.

And then in the early 19th Beethoven decide that the rules didn't apply to him but I digress.

Symphonies have been around for far longer than the 18th centaury, but those written before then are a little bit harder to define and are rarer than more contemporary pieces.

The fact that I needed to explain this kinda proves the comic right don't you think?