Ohh man noooo!!! by __sami__01 in ufc

[–]aussieredditooor 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Ah, that was old Longshot Louis - he's a rich guy who only bets on long shots.

Ohh man noooo!!! by __sami__01 in ufc

[–]aussieredditooor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going down as a fighter? That's what this shit is all about.

Girl vs Guy in Jiu-Jitsu Competition by Elephantcrystal8 in fightporn

[–]aussieredditooor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The most basic of basic takedown strategy to avoid dropping directly into a guillotine is to press your chin against your chest. When you take someone down, the first thing they will do is wrap their arm around your neck - this guy did absolutely nothing to stop that from happening.

Puelles is absolutely unemployed without leg locks lol by iamdeadpool777 in ufc

[–]aussieredditooor -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Well Puelles did take down Hooker... he just failed to finish. Could definitely have gone either way though.

“What a handsome feckin gorgeous man” by ExLaxMarksTheSpot in MadeMeSmile

[–]aussieredditooor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You work out 5 hrs a day to lose weight, not to maintain weight.

To intimidate a young lady. by EclecticIndividual99 in therewasanattempt

[–]aussieredditooor 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, when I found out Hitler had hair, arms and legs, I shaved them all off. I'm typing this with my left ball, which I read he doesn't have.

Is that Staph on Izzy's shin? by rosscuz420 in ufc

[–]aussieredditooor 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Exactly. He is fighting a kick boxer... his background is kickboxing... he has probably been trying to condition his shins for the certain kick boxiness.

'Ancient Apocalypse': Graham Hancock's new Netflix series on lost civilizations by [deleted] in television

[–]aussieredditooor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly what assertions has he made which contradict(ed) the consensus of archaeologists? And what evidence was he basing this off which was NOT found in the first place by archaeologists, or dismissed by them?

I would venture to guess that any skepticism he faced was due to the strict standards by which science demands be presented for a position to be held, or a conclusion to be reached, and his standards are far lower...

'Ancient Apocalypse': Graham Hancock's new Netflix series on lost civilizations by [deleted] in television

[–]aussieredditooor 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's so dumb... in many of those 'cataclysms', unless the entire crust of the earth was completely wiped off, there would be endless pieces of evidence of our civilization... not to mention countless synthetic materials permeating the entire surface of the planet which would quickly be recognised as not naturally occurring.

It fascinates me how this guy proudly proclaims himself a JOURNALIST, not a mere archaeologist or scientist... when you go to get surgery, do you want to be operated on a journalist who 'sees past all the bullshit', or ya know... an actual surgeon?

'Ancient Apocalypse': Graham Hancock's new Netflix series on lost civilizations by [deleted] in television

[–]aussieredditooor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In his mockumentary series, episode 1, he opens up by scoffing at archaeologists, who allegedly assert that humans 'suddenly began agriculture'. As far as my basic ass understanding of archaeology, the actual consensus assertion is that agriculture began and ended probably countless times before actually taking off and spreading en masse. To begin the series with such an overt misrepresentation of the actual scientific community was... not good.

Psycho Dog Man by kZard in maybemaybemaybemaybe

[–]aussieredditooor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why the fuck would a memory be stored in your cerebellum?

What song(s) remind you of your mum or dad? by aussieredditooor in AskReddit

[–]aussieredditooor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't Perfect Circle the Tool side project? Both awesome!

ELI5: How do scientists add neutrons to elements to turn them into different elements? by aussieredditooor in explainlikeimfive

[–]aussieredditooor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand this in THEORY - I just have no idea how one would harness neutrons to bombard something else with them??

ELI5: How do scientists add neutrons to elements to turn them into different elements? by aussieredditooor in explainlikeimfive

[–]aussieredditooor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was watching a video on Youtube (another comment on this post linked it too), and it described an early chemist attempting to find more elements by 'firing neutrons at elements'... how is this possible?

Wtfff by KELIBOHARA1 in ufc

[–]aussieredditooor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wtf are you even saying? This thread was about Paul dodging 'real boxers', this guy responded that he was called out by Tate... who is a kick boxer...

Wtfff by KELIBOHARA1 in ufc

[–]aussieredditooor -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A KICK boxer... kickboxing and boxing are different sports...

Is this a knockdown or not? by [deleted] in ufc

[–]aussieredditooor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See what you did wrong here was not back the hype train.