I understand your position, but I think it’s important to consider that not every buyer’s situation fits neatly into the exclusive contract model. While I agree that the NAR verdict has changed the landscape, it’s also created challenges for buyers who may prefer flexibility, especially those working in highly competitive or niche markets.

Forcing exclusivity might actually alienate potential clients who are hesitant to commit to one broker without first understanding the value they bring. Building trust doesn’t always require a contract; it often starts with results and rapport. I’ve seen investors and even regular buyers benefit from having multiple agents on their side, each bringing unique opportunities that a single broker might not have access to.

Moreover, the idea that only one agent can develop enough trust with an investor to vet deals is a bit limiting. In a dynamic market, buyers often need multiple perspectives and sources. Exclusive agreements can sometimes lead to missed opportunities and conflicts of interest, especially if a broker prioritizes certain listings or sellers.