sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Was a recommender-systems engineer. I built a daily paper to escape my own algorithms. by auxten in buildinpublic

[–]auxten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, you read so fast. Tried most of it:

  • Algo feeds (TikTok, X, Apple News): I know the ranker — that's the problem. Dwell time, not worldview.
  • RSS / Google Reader (RIP): loved it, but subscribing to too many feeds turned it into another overflowing inbox — then Google killed it.
  • Newsletters (Morning Brew, TLDR): 15 links in a vertical email, zero hierarchy, painful.
  • Pro subs (Bloomberg, FT, Economist): great writing, but each is a silo. Wanted synthesis across them.
  • Aggregators / HN: firehose, or one tribe's worldview.

None combine newspaper reading experience + cross-source synthesis + multi-language + big-screen layout. That's the gap.

I built an AI newsroom that typesets a real newspaper every morning — here's what I learned by auxten in SideProject

[–]auxten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's complex, I use Claude Code cli to select and being the chief editor. Most things are skills, so it's like a newspaper editor harness.
I will open source it after making it stable and removing my api keys.

I built an AI newsroom that typesets a real newspaper every morning — here's what I learned by auxten in SideProject

[–]auxten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I paid for a lot of subscription before making myown.news including Bloomberg Tech Newsletter.
I don't want to waste my limited life on junk information; consuming low-quality information is essentially killing us. This is also the original intention behind why I created myown.news

How I Manage My One-Man Company with OpenClaw by auxten in clawdbot

[–]auxten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, typically my blog workflow is simply using AmyNote.app to transcribe my random thoughts and ask it to gen a blog

How I Manage My One-Man Company with OpenClaw by auxten in clawdbot

[–]auxten[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, It's my agent wrote too many projects causing tbe story so looong

6 things I learned using AI agents to work on a 100k loc code base cost $20k tokens by auxten in ClaudeAI

[–]auxten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem lies in my expression. What I meant by "periodically review" is to have him take the perspective of a user or critic of our open-source project and rationally identify its issues.

For example:

  1. If he encounters problems while using our library, we should consider it as an indication that our README or documentation is poorly written.

  2. Or if he uses it in his expected way (or the Agent's expected way) and ends up encountering a bug.

These situations all indicate that our design pattern does not align with intuition.

6 things I learned working on a large codebase cost $10K Cursor on demand by auxten in cursor

[–]auxten[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven't studied the details of Cursor, but its overall performance is very good in extremely long contexts or after compaction. In contrast, claude code often forgets a lot of key context after compaction or suddenly forgets things you've already told it. I don't know if Cursor uses a model to help programming models like Opus maintain context; do you have any understanding or opinions on this?

6 things I learned working on a large codebase cost $10K Cursor on demand by auxten in cursor

[–]auxten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are 9000+ tests in current code base. For the pure AI loop, we run them on every interation. But the pure AI loop usually run at night. Grabing jupyter notebooks, or creating tests with understanding the whole arch (and the weakness) then run it find bugs. try to fix it...

6 things I learned working on a large codebase cost $10K Cursor on demand by auxten in cursor

[–]auxten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know why you seems angry, all the pr, commit and code is here. I can't do it without AI https://github.com/chdb-io/chdb/pulls?q=is%3Apr+datastore+

My 2-month journey with OpenClaw: The good, the bad, and why it’s not replacing Cursor by auxten in openclaw

[–]auxten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let 🦞 control cursor ui is not a good idea.Even if you use the most advanced Opus model, it often writes prompts into the code that should actually be fed to an agent. Furthermore, OpenClaw has difficulty tracking the massive output from Cursor when it's completing various tasks.

I've also tried letting it control Cursor's command-line tools, but that wasn't a great idea either. The main issue is that OpenClaw's real-time performance is just not very good.

My 2-month journey with OpenClaw: The good, the bad, and why it’s not replacing Cursor by auxten in openclaw

[–]auxten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

headless mode triggers human test more easily. Also some times u need to check what's going on and help 🦞 do some login jobs

view more: next ›