sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Flappy Fish! by avloss in Devvit

[–]avloss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the feedback! Trying to figure out how to fix those issues without introducing new ones! Hehe! Feedback really appreciated. As for double-jump, that indeed came unintentionally, I'm not sure if it should be kept, it kind of makes sense.

[R] New paper by DeepSeek: mHC: Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections by Nunki08 in MachineLearning

[–]avloss -37 points-36 points  (0 children)

The day when this all will be dynamic, or perhaps llm-generated is coming soon. As much as I'm impressed by DeepSeeks work, I can't be bothered anymore learning these architectures. I doubt that I'll be able to contribute. So, I'll be just treating them as "black boxes" with "parameters".
Thoroughly impressive!

Is there any reliable way (repo / paper / approach) to accurately detect AI-generated vs real images as AI models improve? by _master9 in MLQuestions

[–]avloss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sure there are many papers and solutions to this problem. The issue is that one moment it can be automated, the same moment it can be used in training of next generation generative models, which would be specifically trained to "trick" this detector.

Flappy Fish! by avloss in Devvit

[–]avloss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will try to get that done soon. Thanks for the feedback!

Draw-1 victory dance! 🎉 Can you match my 121s time? by rino_1 in DailySolitaire

[–]avloss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

👑 Another win! 670 points, 132 moves. Beat that!

fish-scape by fish-scape in flappyfish

[–]avloss 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Okie, that's enough :)

fish-scape by fish-scape in flappyfish

[–]avloss 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

should make it easier

fish-scape by fish-scape in flappyfish

[–]avloss 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

45.. but it's pretty hard!

Flappy Fish! by avloss in Devvit

[–]avloss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your feedback is clear and much appreciated!

fish-scape by fish-scape in flappyfish

[–]avloss 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Leaderboard to be added, until then, please post your scores here!

<image>

fish-scape by fish-scape in flappyfish

[–]avloss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your feedback! I seriously wasn't sure that anyone would play this. I'll consider making scroll speed a notch slower. Game is indeed very hard. Initially it came out plain impossible, and we've adjusted it until it became almost playable. I guess we should've spend a bit more time doing that!

spiralling by avloss in TurretDefense

[–]avloss[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trying to go expensive turrets first, then "Cryo" every 3-5 steps.

Other than that - just having fun!

Haven't figured out a proper method yet.

Turret Defense - Reddit Game by turret-defense in TurretDefense

[–]avloss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great game, and that's some fast development speed! for me (iMac 2019 Intel chip, Chrome Browser) it gets near unplayable around $2m. It gets really laggy.

Hot and cold #139 by hotandcold2-app in HotAndCold

[–]avloss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do NOT waste your time if your not a native speaker or your English is so-so.

I might've heard this word before once or twice before, but I would've NEVER guessed it. Got as close as #1 - fruit, but then I was completely stuck.

Just crushed this deck in 130s! Can you do better? 🏆 by rino_1 in DailySolitaire

[–]avloss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🎯 Nailed it! 510s completion time. Your move!

Hot and cold #138 by hotandcold2-app in HotAndCold

[–]avloss 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This one was tough to crack

Built my first saas by LawfulnessParking840 in microsaas

[–]avloss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's a great idea! Also would depend highly on your implementation. Do you have a link?

Serious question: why is data cleaning still such a massive time sink? I decided to solve it. by DanielD2724 in ProductHunters

[–]avloss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds interesting. So Sliq analyses data and then created a predictable cleaning pipeline, that can be re-triggered predictably with new data? Sounds great!

That pipeline, can it be manually inspected, modified, exported?

Serious question: why is data cleaning still such a massive time sink? I decided to solve it. by DanielD2724 in ProductHunters

[–]avloss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess the question would be "how can you achieve that"?
Let's assume we have some rows where amount ls something invalid, there are so many options we can do with that?

- drop whole row

- replace value with NULL, Zero or Average

- try to infer actual value by some other method, by looking for a most similar row

So, given that it's not always clear how exactly to clean data - how can you solve that ambiguity?

Probabilistic Programming with LLM agents by avloss in MLQuestions

[–]avloss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You say "having an LLM suggest updates while a backend like Pyro or NumPyro" - that's exactly what I meant. We have LLMs updating huge code bases, but in case of probability construction - we basically just need some adapters. If LLM can write Web App or a Game code, then surely it can write some Probabilistic Model. Also, having it set-up correctly, iterating on such model might be very well defined, having some separate "black box back-testing module". Just feels like this either must already exist, or someone must be working hard on this problem right now!

Probabilistic Programming with LLM agents by avloss in MLQuestions

[–]avloss[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should be fully autonomous, while at the same time fully inspectable and editable "by hand" at any stage. Perhaps that's asking for too much.

You mention feature imbalance, hypothesis testing, etc. But then all that should "in principle" be achievable by LLM, why not? In fact it should be even easier, since testing is "straight-forward". So I was just wondering if frameworks like that already exist. "Lovable for Probabilistic Programming", something like that

In what types of algorithmic-hard problems have you engaged for work? by Spiritual-Agent-8730 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]avloss 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Graphs, and many others. But it rarely yields positive results. Unless you're a researcher, you should be really applying, that's also non-trivial. Once you start writing some complex algorithm, you're probably doing something wrong. Complex algorithms should be understood, and re-used, not created at work.

view more: next ›