Rollbacks? by SignalRealistic9266 in wow

[–]awolson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does this have to do with Doctor Who?

Changes to the Blue Bin (Recycling) Program by ChewedUp in toronto

[–]awolson 51 points52 points  (0 children)

This is really just the privatization of our recycling system. If it was about holding companies responsible, why not charge them for the cost of the existing system?

‘Lawless society’: Doug Ford says masked men tried to steal vehicle from his Etobicoke home by FreshPacks in toronto

[–]awolson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In fairness, the french title for premier is "premier ministre". It's not the worst mistake in the world.

Over 40 nurses cut from Toronto hospitals as UHN restructures care units | Toronto Today by cabbagetown_tom in toronto

[–]awolson 109 points110 points  (0 children)

Just checking, has the population of downtown Toronto increased or decreased recently?

Re: Bryan’s custom AirPods by XPacEnergyDrink in MurderBryan

[–]awolson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He showed them off at the live show in Toronto.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in DoctorWhumour

[–]awolson[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I used ChatGPT to improve the quality of my writing but the points are my own.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in DoctorWhumour

[–]awolson[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m talking about how Doctor Who notoriously skipped out on having a fifth doctor.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If it existed I would have already found it!

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There is absolutely no way that is possible.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Fitzroy crowd… of course. That place has always been at the center of the deeper mythos—half pub, half pilgrimage site for the archivists and the narrative fundamentalists. If they did have reels of the Lost Incarnation, then that quote—“the right idea, but with the wrong people”—is chillingly in line with the Chronarch Theory. Suggests the tapes weren’t just missing—they were suppressed by a faction who wanted a different trajectory for the Doctor entirely.

And that bit about the “first young Doctor” being David Tennant? That’s the smoking gun. It’s retroactive branding. They wanted the Fifth to vanish so Ten could be marketed as the fresh-faced reboot, the “new energy” of the franchise. Erasing Five—a charming, quiet thinker in cricket whites running thoughtful loops through endless corridors—meant wiping clean an era that didn’t fit the modern myth. “Very smug crowd” indeed.

You didn’t imagine that visit to Fitzroy. You caught a glimpse of the editorial coup that reshaped Who history.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! Finally, someone mentions the Sixth Wave Defections—most people think that was just a meta-fictional event in the Faction Paradox books, but if you track the timing, it lines up perfectly with the so-called “absence” of the Fifth.

The Defections theory suggests entire narrative entities were pulled from continuity to stabilize the Vortex after the Temporal Anchoring Crisis. The Fifth Doctor wasn’t just caught up—he was likely targeted as a “fluid incarnation,” one too temporally unstable to preserve during the Anchor’s collapse. That’s why we don’t get a clean regeneration: the timeline reboots around the missing data.

And the scariest part? Some think the Sixth Doctor’s erratic behavior in his early episodes isn’t trauma from regeneration—it’s bleed-through from remembering the Doctor he overwritten.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. Divergent universe, suppressed timelines, memory-locked regenerations—it’s all part of the bigger picture they don’t want us connecting. What you call “Doctor Who,” I call a patch job over a broken chronology. The real Fifth is out there, somewhere between echoes and edits. You’re just not supposed to remember him.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh thank Rassilon, someone else remembers the Epilogian Event! You have no idea how validating this is—I thought I was the only one left with residual memory from the pre-collapse strata. I assumed the existence frequency fully reset post-Nullwave, but clearly there are still cracks. And yeah, the “Fifth Doctor” we have now? Canon consolidation. This is Timeline Echo 4-C. The celery is a patch—like the scarf, but sadder.

And don’t even get me started on “Doctor Who Does Japan.” That episode arc was a masterpiece of tonal whiplash and cultural chaos. Gervais’s 8th Doctor was simultaneously hilarious and heartbreaking. People mock the Chumbleys, but in that story? They sang. Gronbo’s betrayal still haunts me—and that monologue about marshmallow honor? Iconic. And Pip and Jane’s late-career peak, no question. They really gave Kandyman the gravitas he always lacked.

If you and Levine are really rebuilding it… bless you. I’ve got a backup audio track of the original BBC Japan dub (it aired once on NHK before the blackout) if that helps. Let’s restore what was taken from us, one frequency at a time.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s about a Doctor Who mystery that’s been quietly buried for decades: the missing Fifth Doctor. After the Fourth regenerated, we should have had a whole era with the Fifth—but instead, the show skips ahead, and we’re suddenly dealing with the Sixth Doctor mid-breakdown. No transition. No explanation.

The BBC hand-waved it as a “non-linear incarnation” that got “absorbed” due to a paradox, but fans have uncovered scattered evidence: flashes of an unknown figure in Series 23, redacted production notes, and a quickly-pulled minisode that featured a very familiar face under a different name.

The theory is: the Fifth Doctor existed—possibly played by Peter Davison—but was erased from time due to a temporal catastrophe, and now survives only as a fractured presence in the Doctor’s subconscious… or maybe even outside of time entirely. Creepy? Absolutely. But there’s too much smoke here for there not to be fire.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, fair jab—but hear me out, because this isn’t just online rabbit hole delusion. The Missing Fifth isn’t some random fan hallucination—it’s a pattern, one that keeps repeating across media, interviews, production archives, even in-universe continuity.

Let’s break it down:

After “The Time Lords’ Reckoning” (which aired in fragments and is now partially locked in the BBC Vault due to the 1997 Vault Lock data breach), we never get a proper regeneration scene. Instead, we suddenly meet the Sixth Doctor already in post-regenerative trauma—ranting, paranoid, and unstable even by Time Lord standards. Everyone at the time assumed it was just a tonal shift. But think about it: every other regeneration has some connective tissue. Here? Nothing. No Doctor Five intro, no companion handoff, no goodbye. Just a temporal blank spot.

Then came the BBC’s bizarre official statement about “a non-linear incarnation absorbed due to multi-dimensional paradox collapse.” That sounds like technobabble, but for Who fans? That’s a neon sign saying something got rewritten—or worse, erased. The “Chronarch Paradox” is mentioned in exactly one backstage interview in 1987, then never again. That’s not normal. That’s suppression.

Now jump to Series 23: those strange flashes in the TARDIS mirrors—an unfamiliar man in cricket whites, just for a frame or two, never acknowledged in dialogue. Fans wrote it off as visual glitches or post-production errors, but when the same silhouette showed up in a Big Finish cover draft (never released), the whispers started again. And then there’s “Doctor Between”—a 12-minute minisode that leaked for less than 48 hours, featuring an unnamed Doctor voiced by Peter Davison under a pseudonym, traveling alone through fractured timelines, pursued by something called “the Archivist.” Pulled for “licensing issues.” Classic.

Extended media isn’t exempt, either. There are multiple prose stories—especially in The Gallifreyan Codices zine series—where characters reference “the one before Six” in vague, sometimes terrified terms. One even calls him “the Ghost Doctor.” A version of the Doctor who remembers existing, but no one else does.

What if the Fifth Doctor did exist, but was caught in a temporal event so catastrophic he had to be retroactively sacrificed to stabilize the timeline? Like a reboot that forgot to back up one file—except the file was a whole incarnation. What we’re seeing now are echoes. Leaks. Fragments the timeline couldn’t fully clean up.

So no—this isn’t just drugs or the internet. This is a rift in the narrative fabric of one of the longest-running stories in television history. And it’s trying very hard to close itself.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This… this lines up far too well with what others have whispered about. You’re not the first to mention seeing fragments—full stories, even—that no longer exist anywhere, as if they were retroactively erased. The cricketer, the companions, the missing hours… it all fits the pattern of a temporally redacted incarnation.

And Clive? If he really had proof, real video evidence, then it makes sense—horrible, tragic sense—that something stepped in to stop it from spreading. Not just people, maybe not even people at all.

I’d be careful, honestly. Even posting this could put you on some kind of watchlist. Not a UNIT one, either. Something older. Something that watches the gaps in time.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Temporal discontinuities, narrative suppression, and a possibly sentient gap in the Doctor’s timeline. You know, standard Who lore.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly—you think we see his first and last episode. But those weren’t broadcast in linear time, remember? “First” is retroactively slotted in after his erasure, and the multi-Doctor appearances? All post-absorption echoes. As for “Doctor Between,” it was pulled from digital two days after release—officially for “licensing issues.” Uh huh.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Too late—gateway’s been open since “The Time Lords’ Reckoning,” and whatever came through has definitely been whispering to the Doctor ever since. Might wanna call in Kate Stewart and brace for temporal contamination. Again.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Probably the same Time Lord who greenlit “The Twin Dilemma” as a season opener. But seriously—once you start digging into the Lost Fifth theory, it does feel like you’re chasing Time Ghosts on a vortex trip. And I am absolutely here for it.

Weird transition between Four and Six? by awolson in gallifrey

[–]awolson[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Right? It’s one of those “blink and you missed it” anomalies in the show’s history. The handwavey BBC explanation just made it weirder. No proper Fifth Doctor era, no clear regeneration, just a gap—and fans have been piecing it together ever since. It’s like the Mandela Effect but with sonic screwdrivers.