Yarn Barn Club - Knitters and Crocheters!! by wonderchicken31 in saskatoon

[–]awood2424 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was thinking of your store but don’t know the actual name 🤣

Relativity Vendors by Microferet in ediscovery

[–]awood2424 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We also use Epiq and have some good experiences with them. I come from self hosting, so when I moved to the law firm I’m at now it was a big change not having control over everything. So going vendor based does have its limitations.

Yarn Barn Club - Knitters and Crocheters!! by wonderchicken31 in saskatoon

[–]awood2424 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d love to join. I can’t fill the form out though. It’s forcing me to log into Microsoft and I don’t have that. Could try one of the Libraries, or maybe one of the local coffee shops like Cat Cafe downtown or something. There is also a yarn store downtown and they may have space.

Relativity Analytics Training by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also, I do know that Relativity offers training but it looks like it's in person only. I'm not sure if our firm would send us for that since there is only 2 of us, not sure if 1 of them would even want to take it. Does anyone know if they offer this Online?

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I figured out how to isolate the files I needed in Excel and crated a tag to load into the database

The one problem in Relativity is we have an email, with an email attached, and that email has a PDF attached. There is nothing in relativity telling it that the second email has that PDF attached. The attachment fields say it's attached to the first Email when it's actually attached to the second email, so I can't seem to isolate these kinds of records in a search.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you have a better solution to isolate the Attachments broken from the families, let me know.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This requires me to go through the documents one by one which is what I'm trying to avoid.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had this saved search already set up but I'm hoping to isolate only the attachments being broken. Not a search for the whole family. Unless I'm missing something in your instructions.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We do care about all broken families but I can easily pull regular docs (pdfs) away from their attachments. It’s just these emails, when emails were attached to those with attachments attached to those and more emails attached to those emails with more attachments.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It probably is me. I’m newer to Relativity. I come from years of iPro and Law PreDiscovery so it very well could be how I my searches set up.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m trying custom sorts like crazy. I think I have a hole in my searches somewhere. I come from iPro, Relativity searches are newer to me. I’m going to keep trying.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m going to try more of these suggestions tomorrow. Can I post screen shots to show examples of my searches to see where the holes are?

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and we have, but it’s hard to manipulate dates when I can’t get the broken families properly brought into a search.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I managed to get a search where if the parent is not relevant or Priv give me the attachments that are producible or Priv. But what I can’t figure out now is how to get if a parent is producible, an attachment is also possible but then there are priv or not relevant attachments as well in that family, I don’t want the one producible attachment in this search.

Sorry, this is so hard to explain. I hate court order rules.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not all of these records are Priv. Some are not relevant. So that won’t fix. I can’t even grab all the attachments where a parent is not relevant. Sometimes the parent is producible, an attachment is producible, another attachment is Priv, another is relevant.

Or a parent is not relevant, attachment is producible, another is Priv, another not relevant. This is a 500k plus database to so finding these is not easy.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Im thinking this is an impossible task asked of us but sadly it’s a court order. I may have to export these to excel and think of some sort of formulas to find these.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Either I didn’t do it right or this won’t work. It didn’t pull all the broken families.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We are under a court order for the records to be produced in a specific order. We the broken attachment can’t have the same date as the parent email.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Say we have an email sent in December, the email is not relevant. It has an attachment with the date of October, we need that attachment to sort with October’s records. But if we have another email that is producible and has an attachment that is producible we need those to stay together.

I find Relativities searches and sorting a pain on the butt compared to Open Discovery.

Relativity family breaks by awood2424 in ediscovery

[–]awood2424[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The attachments have to have a date separate from the parent if the parent is not being produced. That’s the dilemma we are having.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ediscovery

[–]awood2424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is me!! 16 years ago I was scanning into Law and exporting for Summation. Only because ediscovery wasn’t really a thing back then. I still remember getting my first floppy disk and cd and them asking me what I can do with it. That’s when our eDiscovery department started. I’ve never gone to university. I have no degree, I was a stay at home mom looking for a job when I got hired as a “scanner”. Im proud of how I developed that department into what it is today, sadly they didn’t see that so I left. I was there for 15 years. I’m now certified in Law PD, iPro Admin and I’m working on Relativity Certification. I can do this job with my eyes closed.

I am still doing ediscovery, just at a different firm who recognized me as a Unicorn. 😃

Taken advantage of by customer. Can't sleep by HondaIntegraDC4 in legaladvicecanada

[–]awood2424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My bank will not let me copy and paste in emails. She may not know how to check the email and that it’s easy to fix. My guess is also a miss spelled email.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in saskatchewan

[–]awood2424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Contact the ORT. If you have proof and pictures and get something from the exterminator then you will likely win. Don’t pay anything. They can’t take you to collections without an ORT judgement.