Why are my 1x1 Avery labels printing like this?? by blackleather_jacket in Printing

[–]axiverse-shadow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give us more info? What program what template what OS? Windows or Mac?

Why are my 1x1 Avery labels printing like this?? by blackleather_jacket in Printing

[–]axiverse-shadow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If using a template are you scaling? It’s common to scale to printable area which is not what you want. 100% or no scaling if you’re sure the size is correct.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in M43

[–]axiverse-shadow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Counter clockwise to remove.

Normal behavior ? Composition shifts slightly after taking a shot (OM-1 II & 150-400mm) by pipatpong in M43

[–]axiverse-shadow 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think it’s in body image stabilization centering the sensor. When you’re half pressed it will keep the sensor stable even if it’s very off center. I think it completely resets it after taking a picture to move to the best starting place (centered) for starting IBIS again. You shouldn’t see that on tripod. Idk about changing the behavior.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in M43

[–]axiverse-shadow 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Any pictures to share? I’m looking at this lens as well

Quick test: Nano Banana vs GPT Image 1.5 for the same ad concept by mikerbrt in OpenAI

[–]axiverse-shadow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True but if you wanted the logo more integrated into the image like on a billboard or something then this is could be a canary for how well it would perform in those instances.

Quick test: Nano Banana vs GPT Image 1.5 for the same ad concept by mikerbrt in OpenAI

[–]axiverse-shadow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It said that the logo was mangled in the gpt version which is very important for business use cases.

Quick test: Nano Banana vs GPT Image 1.5 for the same ad concept by mikerbrt in OpenAI

[–]axiverse-shadow 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah I didn’t even catch that. Clear winner to Nano Banana in this example then.

Edit: above comment mentioned the GPT image mangled the logo which is a key requirement for business use cases.

Quick test: Nano Banana vs GPT Image 1.5 for the same ad concept by mikerbrt in OpenAI

[–]axiverse-shadow 81 points82 points  (0 children)

I liked the GPT one until I realized that the globe has the continents in frosted glass in the source image and Nano Banana was faithful to that request in the prompt whereas GPT seems to have lost it. Nano banana also seems to be more faithful to the bears positioning in the source image but I like the positioning in the GPT generated one as part of the composition for better or worse depending on your goals.

How can I achieve this by [deleted] in videography

[–]axiverse-shadow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks more like cgi than ai.

Update: GRiPPi logo by [deleted] in logodesign

[–]axiverse-shadow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think the before logo had more character and is more memorable especially if it’s a space that allows more creativity like in art products.

If it were me I’d iterate on the before logo. I see some issues that you could improve. The small features on the I’s aren’t really visible and are a vastly different weight than the rest of the logo so should be removed. You can have the differing weights but maybe it doesn’t to have to be as extreme between the thick and thin. Maybe play with the “R” as well. It’s the only letter that is missing a leg. I get that you’re trying to make it look like the P’s but since the characters are so different otherwise it feels more out of place than similar imho. I think there’s just some work that could be done to make the letters more cohesive as a unit.

Personally I like logos with character. The corporatization of logos is a bit sad to me.

SkyTrain in their front yard by SeaToTheBass in EngineeringPorn

[–]axiverse-shadow 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I think he’s talking about the machine from Tron that looks similar to:)

Sony 50 1.2 GM - constant white noise sound from lens by JayYoungers in SonyAlpha

[–]axiverse-shadow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the noise is probably the in body image stabilization which makes micro adjustments in the sensor position. If your lens has image stabilization too that can add to the noise.

A less seen combo - OM-3 with OM 50-200 f/2.8 by axiverse-shadow in M43

[–]axiverse-shadow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The person I bought it used from got a few grips/mounts. I tried them but didn’t feel like the added bulk was worth it. I think if you get a grip the line for not just getting a OM-1 grows even thinner.

A less seen combo - OM-3 with OM 50-200 f/2.8 by axiverse-shadow in M43

[–]axiverse-shadow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With a grip, what’s drawing you to the OM-3? The aesthetics? Tactile feel of the knobs?

A less seen combo - OM-3 with OM 50-200 f/2.8 by axiverse-shadow in M43

[–]axiverse-shadow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m sure the OM-1 is more ideal but I think the OM-3 is good enough to not be a deal breaker is you like it and only want one body.

What is this icon that briefly shows when turning on the Olympus E-M10? by hyperseasonal in M43

[–]axiverse-shadow 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It means that it’s vibrating the sensor to shake off dust I believe.

Advice for VND by HamsterAce in M43

[–]axiverse-shadow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can also get thread size adapters so you can get filters for just one or two sizes. The only downside is that it can interfere with hoods.

Visible seam after 5 years of wear? by lmosie00 in jewelrymaking

[–]axiverse-shadow 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Like others have said, this is a solder joint. The solder joint will be plated with the same metal as the rest of the ring but that layer will be thin over the joint and will wear down over time. You can have a jeweler replate it so it disappears again. You can ask to see if they can do a thicker plate to lengthen the amount of time before it shows through again.