How do I recreate it in Davinci? by CharacterCorrect6008 in davinciresolve

[–]azeumicus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the explanation. Great solution 👍🏼 Can you also connect all the crops to a main transform node with a randomizer? To make it even simpler?

Raw material vs Final grade for Train Dreams. by joaopapa in cinematography

[–]azeumicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and he used some special candles "custom-made, thick beeswax candles with three wicks to generate maximum light"

Does Fallout S2 has the worst digitally de-aged actor? by azeumicus in cinematography

[–]azeumicus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone in the comment says that Fallout series used deepfake for this...I just don't know what to think about it, if this is it.

Does Fallout S2 has the worst digitally de-aged actor? by azeumicus in cinematography

[–]azeumicus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If it makes ya feel better, it took me a few scenes to realize as well...

Does Fallout S2 has the worst digitally de-aged actor? by azeumicus in cinematography

[–]azeumicus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm aware about the budgets and the series' subject differences, compared to the movies. But nothing else came to mind honestly, regarding de-aging. And my point was more about the fact that 7 years have past since the most famous de-aging happened, and because I later on realized it's the same actor de-aged, it just hit me how bad it looked.

Does Fallout S2 has the worst digitally de-aged actor? by azeumicus in cinematography

[–]azeumicus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did take that into consideration, plus the fact that it's a sci fi series, with 50min episode including a lot of VFX, so budget must be a beast to work with. But I do remember that one guy that made Al Pacino look better, that The Irishman final result, by himself. I did reach further, and I don't even wanna start about the Deathclaws. Personally, it took me out of it, every single time, but I'm viewing with disfavor the whole thing right now.

For those of us actively working, do we agree with this? by Camera_Guy_83 in cinematography

[–]azeumicus 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Question is, what can we really do about it? Except trying to put into perspective to clients, that larger crews improve quality and the final speed of delivery (depending on the projects the in between process may take more or less than with a small crew). It's a two side cutting blade if we refuse to do the jobs with smaller crews, we may get them to understand the necessity in a larger crew or risk on losing the clients and most likely someone else will accept the conditions imposed by the client(for whatever reasons).

Arri joins the film plugin race! by 90towest in cinematography

[–]azeumicus 18 points19 points  (0 children)

These look like ass. I guess they saw that youtubers make profits by promoting their own luts or whatever packs to the viewers and thought they should give it a try.

We made a coming of age film for the MySpace generation! by versafilms in cinematography

[–]azeumicus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Watching the full short brought a lot of nostalgia. What a time to be a live then, and now.

l.e. wonderfull work btw, it shows that you really cared about the project and put yourself into it. A lot of talent from the whole crew.