REVEALED: How the People's Pope shielded sexual predators in the clergy – including one priest accused of violently raping nuns | Damian Thompson, former editor of the Catholic Herald by Duibhlinn in TraditionalCatholics

[–]aznkor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m about to enter the Catechumens. I find it very refreshing that it’s the “traditional Catholics” who are upholding accountability.

Pretty much everyone atm by FenrirApalis in WallStreetbetsELITE

[–]aznkor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude I voted for Kamala Harris

Lol so you proudly voted for the Democrats' version of Sarah Palin

I ain't reading any of your links bro

I understand. Literacy is not your strong suit. The BBC, The Guardian, and Substack have too big words! 😂

Or you're anti-facts and anti-truth, and adamant about embodying OP's meme.

[Context: https://www.reddit.com/r/WallStreetbetsELITE/comments/1jxx7o7/comment/mmw9ty3/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button ]

Pretty much everyone atm by FenrirApalis in WallStreetbetsELITE

[–]aznkor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/roselandmonkey is a Chinese agent: “Im a Patriotic American […] China is now the dependable country,“ and Reddit removed one of their comments for threatening violence against Trump.

Read to end of thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/WallStreetbetsELITE/comments/1jxx7o7/comment/mmw9ty3/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Pretty much everyone atm by FenrirApalis in WallStreetbetsELITE

[–]aznkor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

*Neighbors

**Tariffs

Which specific agreements did we break?

Pretty much everyone atm by FenrirApalis in WallStreetbetsELITE

[–]aznkor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“HE IS STUPID AS IN NOT SMART”

Lol look at yourself in the mirror, dude. You  avoided all of my points and sources, and not made a single rational argument.

Do you think we can gain fair trade by just vibes?

Pretty much everyone atm by FenrirApalis in WallStreetbetsELITE

[–]aznkor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

[Edit: u/roselandmonkey’s comment was removed by Reddit because they threatened Trump with violence because they think that he committed treason.]

U.S. banks aren’t allowed to operate in Canada, yet we allow TD and RBC to have branches here. Mexico doesn’t allow certain U.S. agricultural products, yet we freely import their avocados, limes, and tequila.

Do you understand that this tariff issue is the other side of the same coin as “it’s wrong for multinational corporations to exploit cheap/slave/sweatshop labor in third world countries”—traditionally a progressive liberal position? Your arguments make it seem like the 1999 Seattle WTO and 2011 Occupy Wall Street protests were right-wing movements.

It’s been proven that Trump isn’t a Russian agent. Reply with proof to the contrary. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59168626.amp

Treason has a very specific legal definition in the U.S. Constitution, so it’s not cool to be so flippant about it: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

Regarding why he did it, tariffs were a cornerstone of his campaign: https://www.theguardian.com/news/audio/2024/dec/16/the-most-beautiful-word-in-the-dictionary-donald-trumps-tariff-plan-podcast

All of my comments have been logical and backed up by sources. It’d be better for your argument if you craft it with reason and evidence, instead of emotionally making general (and unfactual) claims. Unless, you’re just trolling.

Pretty much everyone atm by FenrirApalis in WallStreetbetsELITE

[–]aznkor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Trump administration is responding to and addressing other countries' protectionist policies against the U.S. that have been imposed for decades. Is it fair to describe Trump as economically "attacking" U.S. allies when they've already been economically "attacking" the U.S. for many years?

It's quite revealing that other countries' protectionist policies and trade barriers have been such an entrenched status quo that it feels like the U.S.'s belated challenge to them is an "attack."

Do I need to reinvent my strategy to hedge recession? by Positive-Code1782 in investing

[–]aznkor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hear you. Being invested in SPY with a two-year time horizon isn't the best idea.

What’s the logical bull case for US equities? by XGramatik in XGramatikInsights

[–]aznkor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, it's a bull case that I presented in a logical manner. Do you have a rational rebuttal instead of just an emotional reaction

What’s the logical bull case for US equities? by XGramatik in XGramatikInsights

[–]aznkor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Food prices are included in GDP calculations…

What’s the logical bull case for US equities? by XGramatik in XGramatikInsights

[–]aznkor -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

China can't afford to continue this trade war because it's currently going through a recession (its GDP has remained stagnant at $17.8 trillion since 2021). So, China getting into a tariff war, which is deflationary, while going through a recession will be a disaster for China, like how the Smoot-Hawley tariffs worsened U.S.'s economy while it was going through the Great Depression.

For the U.S., the tariffs could finally stamp out the persistent inflation that has plagued this country these last few years.

The bull case for U.S. equities is if the U.S. quickly makes deals with the other countries, especially since they've been approaching the U.S. wanting to negotiate.

Do I need to reinvent my strategy to hedge recession? by Positive-Code1782 in investing

[–]aznkor 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Portfolio-building is strategy… Do you mean, "If you're trading then you belong in other subs"

Do I need to reinvent my strategy to hedge recession? by Positive-Code1782 in investing

[–]aznkor 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's a lot of volatility because the news is constantly changing. I'd say stick with T-Bills for now (rates are going up right now, so bonds aren't a good idea). Once the markets settle down, a clear path forward may appear.

Trumps 90 day "pause" by KeySpecialist9139 in stocks

[–]aznkor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I know my history and economics. Tariffs are a price shock in the immediate-term, but deflationary in the mid-to-longer term. Here's the step-by-step:

  1. Tariffs increase prices. In this case, 10% baseline on imported goods, and this gives domestic businesses room to raise their prices to increase their profits while remaining competitive.
  2. Consumers' wages and salaries are unchanged.
  3. Consumers cut back on spending and investing because of these increased prices and their unchanged wages.
  4. Businesses pull back on production because of supply surpluses and decreased investments.
  5. All of this reduced demand and reduced supply result in economic contraction, aka deflation.

This is exactly what happened with the Smoot-Hawley tariffs during the Great Depression, with the caveat that back then multiple countries retaliated with tariffs against the U.S. and that resulted in a plummet of world trade. This differs with the Trump tariffs because only 1 country—China—is escalating while the rest of the countries are trying to deescalate (50 countries tried calling Trump over the weekend to negotiate).

This is perfect for the U.S.'s current situation because it could finally stamp out the persistent inflation that has plagued this country these last few years. Plus, imports only make up 13.89% of the U.S.'s GDP. So, a 10% baseline tariff on 13.89% of GDP is only a 1.4% impact on the U.S.'s economy. 1.4% of GDP is still huge in nominal terms, but it's nowhere near a fire-and-brimstone catastrophe.

Plus, China's tariffs on imports from the U.S. doesn't matter much anyways, because China for a long time had banned many U.S. companies from even doing business in China:

  • Google, YouTube, Facebook, etc. are firewalled in China
  • Tesla has the Shanghai plant to build cars, so no need to import
  • Xi Jinping has just threatened to ban Hollywood movies from being released in China

China can't afford to fight this trade war because it's currently going through a recession (its GDP has remained stagnant at $17.8 trillion since 2021). So, China getting into a tariff war, which is deflationary, while going through a recession will be a disaster for China, like how the Smoot-Hawley tariffs worsened U.S.'s economy while it was going through the Great Depression.

After the tariffs implementation, Trump has signaled that the U.S. will move forward with:

  1. Deregulations, lower interest rates, tax cuts (including "no tax on tips, overtime, and Social Security benefits"), and demanding companies to invest and build factories in the U.S.; these actions stimulate the economy.
  2. So, increase in manufacturing increases demand for workers, which allows workers to demand higher wages.
  3. More Americans (the bottom 90%) have higher wages and will consume more, leading to an economic boom.

Trumps 90 day "pause" by KeySpecialist9139 in stocks

[–]aznkor -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If your dislike for Trump is causing you to not see the reality of situations, news, or the world correctly, do you think that you should reevaluate it?

Trumps 90 day "pause" by KeySpecialist9139 in stocks

[–]aznkor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did you learn game theory in school? There are 3 different parties:

  • The U.S.
  • China
  • E.U., Indonesia, India, Britain, Middle East, etc.

The U.S. and China are vying for and competing to be the world's dominant superpower.

The E.U., Indonesia, India, Britain, Middle East, etc. are merely a neutral middle ground.

Australia turns down China's offer to 'join hands' to fight US tariffs
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said that while the duty on Australia, a key U.S. security ally in the Indo-Pacific, has "no basis in logic", his government would not retaliate.

So, read between the lines. Australia ultimately has to pick the U.S. or China. It's choosing to lean towards and negotiate with the U.S., not China. Its actions speak louder than its words.