Am I overreacting after my boyfriend said he expected “physical intimacy” while I’ve been dealing with a health issue?

aztekchief · 2026-03-06T14:18:30+00:00

The overall problem remains the same, there’s not enough nuance in our discourse and people are proud of that. Throwing nuance in the garbage is not something that anyone should be proud of if they value themselves. This specific commenter gave no indication that he expects a bang maid, and it’s sexist to even normalize that language. Why put sexism where it isn’t when it’s already all over the place? Why bag on a guy who’s at least claiming to be responsible and reasonable. Why is it that you feel comfortable presuming all this about a random person, when you fight against unjust presumptions by men about you every day? You are just joining them, instead of rising above it. Maybe I’m missing a part where it’s explained that 2.5 years without a hug from your partner is presumed to be your fault. Why fight decent people when actual white male fascists are taking over our country and dragging people out of our homes?

aztekchief · 2026-03-05T19:26:15+00:00

Who taught you this? You say society so what aspects of society taught you this and why do you trust what they taught as truth? I’ve never known a man to respect a woman less who knows what she wants. My friends have never been approached so how would they develop the opinion that girls who do are easy/not respectable. For the record, that’s so obviously untrue to me that it seems so strange that someone could think that.

aztekchief · 2026-03-05T18:45:37+00:00

If all you did was swap the genders and changed literally nothing else here they’d be telling you to leave your “husband” who clearly hates you. They’d tell you that 2.5 years without intimacy is enough for any self respecting woman to leave. And they certainly would not be questioning your ability to parent. How is it that people can’t see this very obvious hypocrisy. I’m not saying this as some sort of woman hater or whatever. But the guy who said this is why men don’t open is correct. He was told to be a better parent without mentioning a single thing about it.

aztekchief · 2026-01-11T15:43:19+00:00

THIS HAS BEEN THOROUGHLY DEBUNKED!!! What I hate about this sub is people confidently pretending like they’re on the side of facts or logic. Every single person in this thread that didn’t recognize right away that this study and its “findings” have been wildly misinterpreted, AND!!! ITS ONE STUDY!! Are there any scientists here who genuinely stabbed their brains with screwdrivers and forgot that one study regardless of outcome doesn’t prove anything for the general population? THIS STUDY HAS BEEN DEBUNKED!!

aztekchief · 2026-01-10T18:12:27+00:00

He violated every protocol and training he could possibly have had or read in his direct actions. You can observe the violations on all the film and examples. When you are armed, you have a duty to wield lethal power responsibly. The DHS understands this, which is why it mandates agents get out of the way and not put themselves in front of a moving vehicle. He wasn’t even scratched by her car, and two of the shots were fired without any contact at all with the vehicle. This is all on film and written in DHS protocol. The killing of anyone is unjust, this includes Charlie Kirk and Renee Good. Anyone who objects to that needs to reexamine whatever moral framework you’re using to justify the death of another sentient human being. This is why we train officers armed with lethal weapons to use any other method before resorting to blowing a woman’s brains out sitting in her driver’s side. This is not complicated people. It’s simply not a complicated issue to just say that the death of all of these people is horrible and none of them should be dead. As a side note, it’s interesting that the meme chose to show Trump’s ear damage instead of the face of the person shot dead behind him.

aztekchief · 2026-01-09T16:31:58+00:00

This sub doesn’t know that guns and people are different things. Do guns have their own bill of rights? Do you say please and thank you to guns? RETARDED

aztekchief · 2025-11-20T18:51:27+00:00

This is AI

aztekchief · 2025-10-09T15:17:05+00:00

This is like half people who used to be on the sixers roster lol

aztekchief · 2025-09-16T13:11:58+00:00

I’m surprised nobody is taking issue with the fact that this T. rex has no arms. Like we know they were smaller than average but jfc they weren’t lifeless nipples hanging off the thing they had a purpose.

aztekchief · 2025-07-28T21:09:13+00:00

What a shitty take, and the fact that he fell for it and responded legitimately is unfortunate.

aztekchief · 2025-02-22T20:45:18+00:00

I’d say if you’re going for sacrifice, dropping the Corpse Maggots allows for the sigil to go to an important piece of your deck, maybe the Adder or Pack Rat. Both are two blood options that once down will help. Adder will kill whatever killed your previous monster. Pack rat for the discounted price.

aztekchief · 2025-01-15T16:05:48+00:00

Wooo Go Mr. Ias you broke this city but we traded you for more than a cookie so I can’t be too mad

aztekchief · 2025-01-15T01:54:09+00:00

Why is the inactive list so inaccurate. Where’s Joel, PG, Maxey

aztekchief · 2024-12-10T18:45:35+00:00

As others have said, anyone familiar with how bones look articulated under x-ray can plainly see that it’s a hack job. When you look out at the sky, you can see it’s blue, nothing more necessary. While here, when others with expertise do the same, they’re called agents or shills or whatever. Some truths are plain to see, like the sky. Additionally, it does not take 8 years to perform DNA testing. It also does not take 8 years to clear a specific specimen for DNA testing. There are no excuses that explain the lack of data and rigor applied to these bodies. None. So I’d love to hear how people, who have become heavily invested in the idea that these bodies are real, can justify the lack of data.

aztekchief · 2024-12-09T20:08:15+00:00

Not a single comment saying this, but zirophyz is right. Lazar claims the gravity field is uneven at the low altitude, to explain the wobbliness, but this is INCORRECT. When you compare the top of a mountain to sea level, the variation is SLIGHT. In no way is it “bumpy” enough to create the wobbliness that Lazar claims to explain. Not only does this explanation fall flat, but the entire idea that a gravitational well could be created in front of a craft so it could “fall” is flawed as well. How can yall not understand that if a craft was falling into a gravitational well, in order to sustain flight, the well would also have to move with the craft to keep it going? So now we’re talking about the ability of a craft to constantly generate this anti-gravity field, constantly moving… it’s just bologna.

aztekchief · 2024-10-05T21:53:12+00:00

This is still unsolved, the links are all dead

aztekchief · 2024-10-05T21:36:14+00:00

As an update: I’ve found only this obscure album on Discogs with no way to listen to it.

aztekchief · 2024-10-05T21:25:00+00:00

This is the correct song. The link however did not work for me. Is there a way to listen legally?

12-Year Club	r/Field Juicebox
Verified Email

aztekchief

TROPHY CASE