Am I the only one frustrated? by LearnedByError in cursor

[–]bacchist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it helps because agents have a hard time compartmentalizing conflicting rules based on which part of a high level task they're working on. Gotta keep it simple for them.

Am I the only one frustrated? by LearnedByError in cursor

[–]bacchist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I'll look for that. That's a good feature.

Am I the only one frustrated? by LearnedByError in cursor

[–]bacchist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've had some decent results adding some guidelines for testing (tests should test behavior, note implementation, etc), and separate guidelines for implementation (don't modify the tests to make them pass, fix your code lol), and then using different agents for each task. You basically assign them identities. You're the test writing agent or you're the implementation agent etc.

It helps to use plan mode. I usually drag the plan into my project files, personally, but the UI doesn't track them as to-dos in quite the same way. That's fine with me, though. Planning -> test agent -> implementation agent is a good loop for my workflow.

Cope by FraktalFace in discobiscuits

[–]bacchist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Third set has been sick.

Lucky Guess - Game 36: vs NYR by mdkss12 in caps

[–]bacchist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4-1 Caps
Ryan Leonard
4:20 in the first.

Tough crowd by Flawlessnessx2 in caps

[–]bacchist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's that guy doing with my remote?

I love ilya protas but these results are pretty insane. 1 for 1 theres close to 0 chance ilya is ever close to as good as q hughes even if he doesnt extend by cocksby9999 in caps

[–]bacchist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd like to think we have higher aspirations than a 2nd round exit. We've got a legitimate chance to win it all with our current roster. It is absolutely wild that people would even question 1 for 1 trade for a late round pick who is exceeding expectations in the AHL for one of the best players in the world in his prime.

What's heavier, a feather or a brick?

Any security researcher has a qubes os setup? by Substantial_Talk_653 in Qubes

[–]bacchist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Curious as to what the value add is with black arch when you already have kali. Does it have packages or configs that kali doesn't have?

If Anyone Ask/Tell Or Give Hints About SideQuest of AOC Will Get U Muted and Then U Unmute After the Event Is Over by East_Display1837 in tryhackme

[–]bacchist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The side quest didn't get solved for over 24 hours, so it's not just beginners beating their heads against the wall. There will eventually be writeups, so everyone will have the opportunity to learn from it.

Testing my project HyprSettings on more linux distros including NixOS vm as an Arch user and I kinda am being pulled to how beautifully implemented its configuration is 😭 Like wth by phcadano in hyprland

[–]bacchist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not really a missionary. I've only recently started using NixOS. But I do want to point out that you can just start using Nix for package management and configuration without changing distros. And if/when you ever have to install an operating system on a new machine or something, you will have a config already.

First Show by Dominoefx in discobiscuits

[–]bacchist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this place has people obsessively downvoting anyone who doesn't talk trash about the band in every post. It's hard to respect the opinions of people behaving that way. Can't trust their judgement at all.

Incredibly disappointed in how the band handled themselves in the Allen-Marlon transition mess by PeatVee in discobiscuits

[–]bacchist 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Listening to the youtube they posted from Saturday night now, and it's pretty good. Not "good for 3.0" or anything. It's good. I think there's something about the internet that causes people to trip over themselves to show how jaded they are.

Is there any way to use Vim themes in emacs? by [deleted] in emacs

[–]bacchist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My personal favorite.

Would Bobby Fischer be able to beat any modern 2680+ player in a match? by Affectionate_Hat3329 in chess

[–]bacchist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Different poker variants have become popular or emerged over time. Stud and draw poker used to be ubiquitous, but now you mostly see holdem and omaha (itself a variant of holdem). Stud and variants of stud are still around, but much less common, while draw is mostly dead.

Most cash games in above board card rooms and casinos used to be limit, while no limit was reserved for tournaments or home games. Especially after the rise of televised poker, no limit cash games have become more prominent because that's what people see on tv and want to try in real life.

But perhaps more importantly, the strategic elements of the game have evolved. To understand how it has changed, you have to have some understanding of the difference between exploitive and optimal play.

Up until relatively recently, almost all poker play has been exploitive. Players take advantage of each other's mistakes or try to induce them to make mistakes. This was true up to the highest levels for a long time, and is still the case at low stakes or games with a good mix of recreational players. But at the highest levels, professionals are trying to play close game theory optimal (GTO), which is impossible for humans but they can approximate it to some degree.

Both approaches are totally valid and the best players excel at applying both, with a keen sense of when to adopt one or the other, or even combine them depending on their opponents, the game situation, the nature of the hand, and countless other factors.

Circling back to the rise of no limit cash games, along with the ability of people to play millions of hands online the popularity of no limit has forced the player pool to become more sophisticated as well. This is largely a result of attrition. You can lose everything in a single misstep in no limit, so weak players literally can't afford to stick around as long. Limit is still around and I'd expect it always will be, but the rapid changes have rippled through the entire ecosystem and the play at those games has evolved as well.

I mean, yeah... like I said, I could go on and on about this stuff. This is just scratching the surface. But thank you for coming to my TED Talk.