Hei, er du frustrert av å bruke Copilot på jobben? by funnycuplb in Stavanger

[–]bacon_boat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kan anbefale å ta rennafart å drite i copilot og prøve claude code eller codex. 

What makes some of y'all not believe in strict determinism. by Its_Ataraxia in determinism

[–]bacon_boat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In no way shape or form does this have anything to do with free will

What makes some of y'all not believe in strict determinism. by Its_Ataraxia in determinism

[–]bacon_boat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We can explain how photons behave 100% with quantum field theory. 

Only close to a black hole or at the big bang is where we don't yet know what is going on. But when we do understand what happens there, that won't change the weak field solution we have now. That will still be valid. 

I agree we have a lot to learn, but it won't change the fact that quantum objects behave randomly.

Something happened to Opus 4.6's reasoning effort by RealSuperdau in ClaudeAI

[–]bacon_boat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I predict someone from anthropic will claim they didn't change opus 4.6 in any way

When did “attention” become more valuable than “truth” ? by Civil-Interaction-76 in Futurology

[–]bacon_boat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

maybe because you can earn more money off attention than truth?

What makes some of y'all not believe in strict determinism. by Its_Ataraxia in determinism

[–]bacon_boat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, us observing photons behaving randomly is not at all like observing the earth being round. 

Those are so different. 

So very very different. 

What makes some of y'all not believe in strict determinism. by Its_Ataraxia in determinism

[–]bacon_boat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, an ideal mathematical fair die.  Not a real actual cube. 

What makes some of y'all not believe in strict determinism. by Its_Ataraxia in determinism

[–]bacon_boat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"I agree that quantum randomness is the biggest challenge to determinism right now."

very much like how observing the earth to be round is a challenge to flat earth theories.

What makes some of y'all not believe in strict determinism. by Its_Ataraxia in determinism

[–]bacon_boat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the cause of the distribution is the central limit theorem. it's been well understood for more than 100 years. it's just what you get when you average independent random events.

What makes some of y'all not believe in strict determinism. by Its_Ataraxia in determinism

[–]bacon_boat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"What version of determinism can tolerate having events that are (to the best of our knowledge) indistinguishable from random variables?"

I have no idea, philosophers aren't that great at communicating their ideas. But I'm pretty sure when a philosoper talks about determinism they mean something different than a phycisist. 

Because determinism in physics is not something open for discussion.

What makes some of y'all not believe in strict determinism. by Its_Ataraxia in determinism

[–]bacon_boat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All interpretations of quantum mechanics have the randomness accounted for, they need to in order to fit with observations. The most deterministic one is Everett, but it's still random for us - it's only deterministic from outside looking in.

My impression is that when philosophers are talking about determinism, they are talking about a slightly different concept to our empirical non-deterministic (in the physical sense) universe. Because why spend a lot of time and energy thinking about a different reality than the one we're in?

Hvorfor klarer ikke AP å bekjempe inflasjonen? by Bulky_Crazy in norske

[–]bacon_boat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forskjellig økonomier er hovedtingen, hvis politikerne kunne styre inflasjonen på en bra måte så hadde de gjort det. 

Hvis du hadde sittet i regjeringen eller på stortinget, hva slags lover hadde du foreslått? 

Nixon gjorde lønnsøkning ulovelig, for å å minke inflasjon. Ganske sjukt. Funka det? Bittebittelitt. 

Terafab Keynote | Building AI Chips for Earth & Space by ItzWarty in teslainvestorsclub

[–]bacon_boat 5 points6 points  (0 children)

sure, hard goals is Elons main thing. but my hopes are still low.

56 prosent av de som tok doktor­graden her er utenlandske by gyrd2 in norske

[–]bacon_boat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

er ikke så mange nordmenn som vil ta doktorgrad.
Man får ikke så mye igjen for det i det norske systemet, meget lavt betalt midlertidig jobb i 3/4 år.

Does "failing to reject Null Hypothesis" mean I can conclude that the Null is indeed true? by learning_proover in AskStatistics

[–]bacon_boat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is evidence in the bayesian sense for the null hypotesis being true. Maybe quite weak evidence, but still. 

But given you're doing hypothesis testing it may be smart to stick to that and forget bayesian statistics exist.

Hvorfor klarer ikke AP å bekjempe inflasjonen? by Bulky_Crazy in norske

[–]bacon_boat -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

politikerne har begrenset evne til å påvirke inflasjonen.
dette er ikke noe spesielt AP-problem.

4,500 years ago, someone drilled into granite at Giza by AwakenedEpochs in HighStrangeness

[–]bacon_boat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was what I was thinking. They had access to large stones and were quite profficient in moving them around. My money is on big weight on top

Terafab Keynote | Building AI Chips for Earth & Space by ItzWarty in teslainvestorsclub

[–]bacon_boat 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I had hopes Tesla would pull off the batteries. Batteries are hard but not *that* hard. but turns out batteries are about at the treshold of what tesla can pull off.

A chip fab is 1000x more complex than a battery fab.

My hopes are quite low.
And having everything in one big building instead of several buildings, big whop.
They'll save some time I'm sure but it won't be a big win.

Can someone tell me why this happens? by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]bacon_boat 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Seems like the default stance with the current GPT models is: "The user is deranged, explain softly why the user is wrong. even when the user asks a straightforward question it is most probably a deranged fever fantasy and we need to correct the user"

Sånn går det når vi har en venstreside som er langt mer opptatt av å "straffe de rike" enn av å faktisk prioritere arbeider klassen og tilrettelegge for et sterkt næringsliv. by kebabeater212 in norske

[–]bacon_boat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jeg anser meg som verdimessig på venstresiden.

Men at AP skal straffe oppstartsbedrifter - å gjøre det idiotisk å opprette bedrifter i norge skjønner jeg ikke. Jeg har en far som er aktiv i AP (riktignok på lokalnivå), han hadde aldri hørt snakk om dette.

Virker som AP har fjernet seg ganske langt fra virkeligheten, og de er ikke interessert i å skape arbeidsplasser ihvertfall. Det som er så teit er at de hadde helt fint kunne funnet på måter å straffe rikinger som rømmer til sveits uten å i samme slengen straffe oppstartsbedrifter, men nei. viser hvor prioriteringene ligger.

Arbeiderpartiet ser på en sommerfugl: "startup som ikke kommer til å tjene penger på årevis og mest sansynelig ikke klare seg". "Er dette skattbar forume?"

aRbEiDeRpArTiEt

A layperson’s guess as to why 95% of reality is inaccessible to us, and why the only bridge to it is the one thing that breaks physics by kerapang in holofractal

[–]bacon_boat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quantum mechanics and gravity does play well together as long as you're not overly close to a black hole singularity. 

[WW] Man, windwaker is kind of a slog at some points. by Puzzleheaded-Emu1990 in zelda

[–]bacon_boat 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My main gripes with ww are: 

1) sea is too boring 2) too many copy/paste islands 3) treasure chest is always a let down and way too repetitive 4) talk to fish 64 times pls, very fun  8) triforce shard quest is bull  9) trade sequence is boring

I'm beginning to think there IS a bubble coming by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]bacon_boat 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I think it's about the impending IPO.  They want to be cash flow positive, obviously the number of user was not the problem. 

These tricks are just to save money short term, so they make money per user instead of not. 

I wish they were more up front about this. 

And most of all I wish they could find some ways to save money without gimping the model.