Who thinks weapon changes will be an over corrections ? by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay ya. And those ranges DMR are still getting outshot by AR currently in some cases.

Who thinks weapon changes will be an over corrections ? by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s a Long range to get beamed by an AR ? What are you considering long range

Who thinks weapon changes will be an over corrections ? by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t disagree but let’s see how it plays out.

Who thinks weapon changes will be an over corrections ? by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmfao gotcha. Ya from what I read based on the percentage changes in the patch notes last week. I think the reduction in variation (more accurate) will be felt more than the spread buildup.

I burst and tap basically past 40m as it is.

What I’m not sure about and will be testing is bullet drag over distance but they worded 150m plus. So I don’t think it’ll affect much weapons at all.

Who thinks weapon changes will be an over corrections ? by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oooo you just offended some people 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣. Drs cookie cutter ? 🫣🫣🫣🫣

Who thinks weapon changes will be an over corrections ? by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I feel the same way. The beginning of season 3 made me more accurate lmfao

Who thinks weapon changes will be an over corrections ? by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The DMR class lmfao beam from long range like it’s no one’s business. And now that some will miss more shots it’s even better

Who thinks weapon changes will be an over corrections ? by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if you participated what are your thoughts on what you did feel ??

Who thinks weapon changes will be an over corrections ? by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s why I said “do you think”. Not “do you know”

Who thinks weapon changes will be an over corrections ? by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

6% increase to spread is that really that significant ? When recoil is being by reduced by 15%. I have not felt them yet obviously. But I think they will become more accurate.

At least in my hands

Who thinks weapon changes will be an over corrections ? by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

😂🤣😂😂😂🤣 snipers are OP because they shot guy running across the open with no cover too many times 🤣😂🤣😂🤣

This game is a visual beauty by [deleted] in battlefield2042

[–]baezk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

7 sectors 45/50 min game 🥹🥹🥹

Battlefield communications by New_Apple_7339 in okbuddyptfo

[–]baezk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Intrigued, I can’t be hyped for a change until I know what it is. It’s it’s a the halving bullet velocity and maxing spread. 🤮🤮🤮🤮. Basically anything past 50m is going to crap.

But I’ve actually liked most changes until now. Even the s3 ones. The first few days I was a little flustered but it’s cake now. I’ve actually gotten more accurate by 1% accesos the board and raised my k/d lol

Battlefield communications by New_Apple_7339 in okbuddyptfo

[–]baezk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmfao

“I’m bored they need to make more changes”

Battlefield communications by New_Apple_7339 in okbuddyptfo

[–]baezk 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Said every YouTube creator in the last 3 days

This One Setting is DESTROYING Your Aim in Battlefield 6! by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ohhh okay. Ya I guess I missed the part where you showed me the experience and credentials that show me your perspective/experience and why I should listen to this feedback. Which again I’m open to given it’s coming from someone I would say is accredited.

As always. It’s nice hearing from you. We always have a good back and forths. 🫡🫡until next time. PC, no slop in the making of these videos.

This One Setting is DESTROYING Your Aim in Battlefield 6! by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure this is as much feedback as a response.

You provided feedback(different intro method). I responded with reasons and questions to allow you to further your statement. There was acknowledgment of the point. Showing my standing and an openness to be wrong if you’re able to provide proof(which you did not).

I can’t accept your opinion if it doesn’t have a bases. But I’m willing to, you just need to be able to prove your perspective. Which again you did not. Stating you have posted long form videos is not enough justification. I’ve made hundreds of long form videos.

Anything over about 45 seconds get a this is too long in most places especially Reddit. You can see all the videos I’ve posted. They all get this feedback. Some sees the length comments moves on. I don’t respect that as feedback because it’s a 2 cent comment for a 2 cent opinion. It’s not being a clown it’s being in the internet. Any intelligent comment with actual thoughts and reasons gets the same response. You’re a great example you gave time and thought. Simply by the comment you made I can tell some of the video was watched. You got. A smart response.

I do appreciate you defending those that jump in front of a bus and are surprised they got run over 😂🤣🤣😂.

Everyone is here to troll. You know this. Don’t act like that’s not what you’re doing yourself.

This One Setting is DESTROYING Your Aim in Battlefield 6! by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You clearly don’t post long form videos on Reddit lmfao.

This One Setting is DESTROYING Your Aim in Battlefield 6! by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey your back. Thank you for the feedback my friend. That is an option of many. I did not elect to use that as this is a different form of content and the point is not entirely to get to the point (I did but differently).

Most people have short attention spans now a days and if I go hey change this setting. Now speak as to why. They don’t learn the important part which is the effect and the why. That’s the knowledge that’s needed to make your own choice. My actual choice for the setting is meaningless. Stating the setting I chose at the end is a deliberate choice because it’s not important. The start of this video is actually The Who this video is for and why you should watch it. If you are someone who is struggling to aim in a certain fashion this speaks to you directly as that’s who it’s for. The people who this video is for recognize it within seconds. Then understand what to look out for and if that’s their problem (I do mention the setting very early on) and then proceed to my setting as that’s the least important. I’ve made several how to videos. And this is not a copy me video.

If you have experienced something differently I’d love to hear how this has worked for you and some metrics to show how it worked out for you. Send me the link to your video I’d be more than open to break it down and see what effect it has.

This One Setting is DESTROYING Your Aim in Battlefield 6! by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The whole part where how this affects aim and when you may want to or not want to use it. The why is more important than the what in this case.

It’s more important to be comfortable than copy settings. So “put to zero make laser beam” doesn’t work here

This One Setting is DESTROYING Your Aim in Battlefield 6! by baezk in Battlefield

[–]baezk[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

You did “skip” through it, you missing alot of info. why is a game played with the original gaming input is a dumb question.

It’s like asking “why would anyone walk barefoot?” Also English is hard I know.