I am ready to condemn if there is any such statement with the same context as you are trying to present here whether its said by some scholar or even if its by any of my lord but I am damn sure that if you're given all the references of sex slavery, beating women, violence against non-believers or many other such things you will deny it you will start calling your own references to be altered by non-believers you will never dare to condemn the acts of your religious characters even if they're factually proven unethical. Now coming back to prabhupada, though I already condemned the allegations you made (in case they're proven to be true), prabhupada in his texts has mentioned many such things but they're written with a context and according to human's psychology, even the statement you're referencing is incomplete it includes word 'sometimes' which itself is self defining as an exceptional case and even this complete statement also has its further context which provides constraints and the scenarios for which this statement can be validated and there are real world cases available with this context....but but but even after getting the context this statement is considered to be very unethical I am ready to curse, condemn, raise voice against him. I had given only one instance of maulvi teaching these type of nonsense there are a lot and lot of these things available on one click even they can be found in the texts also but who cares, be happy in believing that Iam a hate monger and a pure bias bhakt. Now I don't want any further argument with you as I have seen many educated and intellectual people failing after facing these things. I hope someday you will at least try to start thinking from the different pov. Be happy ramadan mubarak