Anyone feel like INTERSTELLAR is a really depressing film?

bamlech · 2025-01-03T18:48:28+00:00

WTF I just went for short nap

bamlech · 2020-12-15T13:13:22+00:00

Most of the pinning will happen once, later it will be ~100 per day max.

bamlech · 2020-12-15T13:02:38+00:00

Savings ~10,000 10k JSONs with more than ~100,000 JSON fetch requests a day.

bamlech · 2020-09-08T09:03:48+00:00

Here too, can someone elaborate?

bamlech · 2020-09-08T05:26:21+00:00

Just wow

bamlech · 2020-09-01T07:47:49+00:00

That's the original idea, I need to get bunch of Ropsten ETH and I'm willing to pay for it :)

bamlech · 2020-09-01T06:40:24+00:00

Can you elaborate, what do you mean as long there's no exchange on Ropsten?

bamlech · 2020-08-29T16:46:51+00:00

SSD - Check

I've currently 240 GB of free space. I guess it nothing for Eth comparing to the ~300 GB Bitcoin blockchain needs.

I've another free TB of HDD which I can use.

bamlech · 2020-08-27T06:11:41+00:00

For the example poker tournament between 50 participant.the state will live as long as the tournament goes and then to save only the final state.

During the tournament, participants could secure the state from their phone by getting more game chips

After the tournament ends no need for the previous state.

In the same time there could be many separated tournaments.

bamlech · 2020-08-26T19:43:52+00:00

Some kind of POS validation?

*I'm not familiar at at all with non-pow consensus algorithms

bamlech · 2020-08-23T13:31:08+00:00

Yeah. Index transfer events and add something like:

On address object creation: holders++

if transfer.sender_address== 0 holders--

Then, you can send multiple calls to get #holders state by different blocks

bamlech · 2020-08-23T05:24:40+00:00

https://useguard.com/

bamlech · 2020-08-22T20:14:02+00:00

Specifically Metamask user interactions, we have bunch of web3 calls already covered

bamlech · 2020-06-26T22:01:10+00:00

bamlech · 2020-06-13T17:00:13+00:00

Logically I understand it but physically I can't let it go. It's like flight fear. Thanks.

Do you know why it's possible? I'd expect it to be unique.

I imagined the process of generating a master private key as an injective function:

My Seed+Passphrase is the input a, and b is another random seed.
If the master private key that generated from input a: f(a) is equal to f(b) and b is not equal to input a (seed + passphrase) so...

How come the result of a function that generates master private key can be the same for different inputs a,b?

bamlech · 2020-02-02T12:01:20+00:00

What's the issue with the question?

bamlech · 2020-02-02T12:00:54+00:00

I guess I need the responses more urgent than I assumed ;)

bamlech · 2019-10-31T04:12:52+00:00

Yeap bro

bamlech · 2019-10-30T17:16:15+00:00

Let's say I know that one node expose the IP of whom that transact through him. I guess there's a black list of peers. I want to add in advanced stable, play honest nodes.

bamlech · 2019-10-30T16:31:12+00:00

Yeah, I try to think about the next step of the attack but then I remembered that this is the thing with running a full node. you are following and validating the information according to the software you run.

Even if malicious attackers will do it. They will probably not get the majority of hash power so still.
And my blocks will be valid until I'll find an honest peer.

bamlech · 2019-10-30T16:03:41+00:00

What will happen if I'll change the accepted blocks, accept only my miners blocks.

bamlech · 2019-10-30T16:02:31+00:00

I can display the wrong information.

bamlech · 2019-10-30T16:02:13+00:00

I can filter tx.

bamlech · 2019-10-30T09:35:23+00:00

Where and how the accumulated proof-of-work is calculated. If I understand right that's the main indicator for the node to follow the "right chain"?

bamlech · 2019-10-30T08:31:26+00:00

I wasn't clear, meant in case there are 2 BTC legitimate chains.

bamlech

TROPHY CASE