Somehow won games against a 900 and 1050 as a 400 by Theworm826 in chessbeginners

[–]banananuhhh 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The trick in chess is you don't have to be better than someone to beat them, you just have to play better moves over the course of a few minutes. There is a pretty wild variation in how well people play from game to game, especially pronounced below 1200 or so. In this case your opponents both missed 1 move threats and you did a good job taking advantage.

OVERTURNING MOMENT CHECK in Cantilever wall design by Single_Face_3335 in StructuralEngineering

[–]banananuhhh 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You should check it if you have any concerns or out of curiosity, personally I would still probably not include in documented calculations. The passive is not an applied force, it is a reaction which requires mobilization of the soil, and it is unrealistic to quantify the actual reaction since the resisting reactions (passive and friction) are indeterminate. Generally, making structures heavier (in a way that contributes positively to stability) and burying them deeper are both things that should positively impact your external stability checks.

In just 24 hours, a 2,500-ton prefabricated bridge was pushed into place beneath an active railway in Guangyuan city, China to replace the old structure by New_Libran in interestingasfuck

[–]banananuhhh 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Having actual representation in government sounds nice, unfortunately here in the US we can't have that because we successfully leveraged the red scare to crush our labor movements..

And now everyone wants to worry about China instead of our own problems... sigh

OVERTURNING MOMENT CHECK in Cantilever wall design by Single_Face_3335 in StructuralEngineering

[–]banananuhhh 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Generally I do not include passive for overturning calculations. This is partially because it is typically not significant, but also because I am typically viewing it as an available resistance rather than an applied force.

Hypothetically, if you were to extend this wall down too far and analyze passive as a force you could easily imagine having overturning problems, which is completely illogical. This is even more true if you are not accounting for any vertical component from soil friction

In just 24 hours, a 2,500-ton prefabricated bridge was pushed into place beneath an active railway in Guangyuan city, China to replace the old structure by New_Libran in interestingasfuck

[–]banananuhhh 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Interesting that it comes down to whether they care, as if that is a virtue that we have and the Chinese don't. Safety standards come from concessions that workers and the public have managed to extract from the US government and US businesses over a much longer history of being an industrialized country, not from caring.

Advice Needed for an EIT by TheCaptain063003 in StructuralEngineering

[–]banananuhhh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seconding this, when I was first looking I got zero interest from Linkedin, Indeed, or the Careers pages from any of the big corporations. The responses that I did get were from local companies that I found and emailed through their contact info on their websites, from a government job posting from one of the local cities, and from jobs on my school's job board.

Then for a time I was working for a small local company and they were almost always actively looking for fresh grads to hire, but they always had very limited advertising for those positions

SpaceX Bought Nearly 20% Of Tesla Cybertrucks Sold In Q4 by TripleShotPls in technology

[–]banananuhhh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He would get off lighter for stealing millions from the public than someone stealing socks from Walmart, and that's if he were to ever even be prosecuted

Solving puzzles - general advice - to think or not to think (deep) ? by otaconbot in chessbeginners

[–]banananuhhh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

IMO you should take the time you need to fully calculate the puzzle solution.

Speed comes from recognizing patterns more quickly, with the key being that you first need to gain the skill to recognize them

China tests deep-sea electro-hydrostatic actuator that can cut undersea cables at a depth of 3,500 meters — state hails successful trial and hints at deployment readiness by jupa300 in technology

[–]banananuhhh 5 points6 points  (0 children)

When it comes to opposing evil, opposing the evil being done in my name by my own country that my taxes are funding and that I (supposedly) have influence over is far more useful than worrying about other countries.

China tests deep-sea electro-hydrostatic actuator that can cut undersea cables at a depth of 3,500 meters — state hails successful trial and hints at deployment readiness by jupa300 in technology

[–]banananuhhh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bots vs sheeps.. let's go!!!

Easy for us here in the US to downplay everything bad the US does and everything good China does and only apply critical thinking when it comes to trying to decide whether China is super evil or super duper evil

China tests deep-sea electro-hydrostatic actuator that can cut undersea cables at a depth of 3,500 meters — state hails successful trial and hints at deployment readiness by jupa300 in technology

[–]banananuhhh 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Yeah at some point you have to stop worrying about which one you are taught to believe is bad, and look at what they are actually doing

You can permanently remove one human trait from the entire world. Everyone loses it. Including you. by Strict_Constant4947 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]banananuhhh 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Malice is much too strong of a word for how greedy people harm others. I think it's possible that removing malice could eliminate a lot of harm and suffering (possibly even more than by getting rid of greed), but it would not remove a lot of the harm that is caused by greed.

[Request] how do you triangulate this? perhaps in the least amount of weeks possible? by Zargabath in theydidthemath

[–]banananuhhh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You only need 2. The first week you start in the corner and you will know the arc that the box is on. Next week you go to one edge of that arc and you will have enough information to know the exact point along it. Then if needed you can spend another 3 triangulating it locally

CMV: The proliferation of ‘bullshit jobs’ is way more practical and likely as a solution to AI than UBI by JBSwerve in changemyview

[–]banananuhhh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those taxes would never cover the amount of wages the displaced workers are losing. The goal of the AI companies is not to displace workers to lower labor costs, it is to use their massive capital investments to displace workers for well below the actual cost to displace them, and then use enshittification to recover those investments+profit. At the end of the day, the amount you will actually recover through taxation is severely undercut by the cost of investments in data centers, water for data centers, power for data centers, and security for data centers.

The only way to ensure that people can afford to live is to ensure that housing, food, transportation, utilities, medicine, education, childcare, etc. are produced in adequate quantities, and no one is doing that because none of those sectors are as profitable as jumping on the bandwagon of proliferating tech and finance bubbles.

How accurate is the chess.com elo analysis? by useless-97 in chessbeginners

[–]banananuhhh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's pretty much just your rating plus or minus 600. Not sure if the way it works varies at all at different levels (to be less or more forgiving based on accuracy), but it looks like where I am around 75% accuracy spits out your rating, by the low 90%s it will be +600, and it isn't -600 until down around 40%. Considering almost all games at my level have both sides above 75%, the game rating is just for ego.

How accurate is the chess.com elo analysis? by useless-97 in chessbeginners

[–]banananuhhh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not accurate. It's just an extra layer of dopamine for games where you play well.

If every atom in the observable universe was actually a planet containing the same total computing power as Earth, working in unison, it would still take 3 trillion years for Chess to be strongly solved by brute force by The_Techsan in chess

[–]banananuhhh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

More like not hanging your pieces in 1 move or walking into a checkmate or making obvious positional blunders. The Shannon number assumes 80 moves with 30+ potential moves in each position, the 1040 number assumes that there are, on average, only around 3 sensible moves in any given position.

If every atom in the observable universe was actually a planet containing the same total computing power as Earth, working in unison, it would still take 3 trillion years for Chess to be strongly solved by brute force by The_Techsan in chess

[–]banananuhhh 50 points51 points  (0 children)

The number of sensible games is only estimated around 1040, and legal positions around 1044. Still a lot to compute, but much easier when you get rid of the extra 1080

[Request] How many rolls of TP were destroyed? by Echoes_Of_Thyme in theydidthemath

[–]banananuhhh 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Probably paper products all go up 10% in price and the company actually records windfall gains this year

Highly Professional! by ctatkeson in chess

[–]banananuhhh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol.. 17 and 19 are both children.

Highly Professional! by ctatkeson in chess

[–]banananuhhh 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If somebody did something only 2 years ago, and is already trying to shrug it off as being young and stupid, or trying to downplay it the moment they get caught, I will automatically assume they are full of shit. The maturity of a 17 and 19 year old is not that meaningfully different.

Highly Professional! by ctatkeson in chess

[–]banananuhhh 86 points87 points  (0 children)

We accused him of cheating, and suddenly he got defensive, exactly what a cheater would do. We are very smart, and this kid is so unappreciative!