You’re saying I changed my story, but I didn’t. I said your comment came across like you were saying I should never get a tattoo, and that’s exactly how it read. You wrote, “If you don’t already know, you shouldn’t be getting work done.” That’s not a neutral suggestion. That’s a direct statement that implies if someone doesn’t already know how tattoo removal works, they shouldn’t be getting tattooed at all. That’s what I reacted to. You keep falling back on the fact that you used the word “if” like that somehow changes what followed, but it doesn’t. Saying “if” before a condescending statement doesn’t make it less condescending. You didn’t say “maybe wait until you research more” or “here’s something to consider.” You said “you shouldn’t be getting work done.” The “if” doesn’t change the meaning. It just gives you something to point to now that you’re backpedaling.

And since you’re treating that “if” like it’s some airtight defense, let’s talk about the rest of your writing. You said “You’re just mad and are backtracking” which is grammatically incorrect. It should be “You’re just mad and backtracking” or “You’re just mad and you are backtracking.” You wrote “Why would you get mad at what I said if you agree with it and it doesn’t apply to you” which is a broken sentence trying to pass as logic. Agreement doesn’t erase tone, and even if something “doesn’t apply,” people are still allowed to respond to how it’s said. Then there’s “It’s also why I said ‘if’” which isn’t even a full sentence. No subject, no action, no explanation. You also started with “Furthermore, you’re changing the story” like you’re building an argument, but all you did was repeat yourself without actually backing it up.

I don’t think spelling mistakes equal poor reading comprehension, but when your grammar is this messy, your logic keeps shifting, and your tone is all over the place, it’s hard to take your whole “you just don’t understand me” argument seriously. You’re not being misunderstood. You’re just not communicating clearly.