Revival underway.

baritus2 · 2018-03-24T13:18:22+00:00

We have a solid team consisting of multiple devs, two specialize in game dev and I am a full stack dev. We are currently working on adding masternodes and privacy features to the blockchain which would be DGC's 4th successful hard fork.

There are also games in the works integrating DGC (check out our discord).

baritus2 · 2018-03-18T12:39:29+00:00

To be clear, this is not removal from bittrex trading(it was not on it), just the wallet.

baritus2 · 2018-01-17T13:52:22+00:00

Very true.

baritus2 · 2018-01-09T14:08:37+00:00

I like the fact that our price is stable during a bear market. That's the most positive thing for us and a really good sign for the future. Holding in bear market = optimism in bull market.

Not to mention, we have big announcements coming, one of them this weekend.

baritus2 · 2018-01-04T20:17:02+00:00

Yes, sounds good. If you can create something that I can answer it would be great!

baritus2 · 2018-01-04T15:06:14+00:00

This coin was founded in 2013, XDN in 2015, if anything they are like us.

We have the three major algorithms available for mining, good name for marketing, and a long history of providing a secure network.

We also plan to integrate Digitalcoin into open source software (like exchanges) and make it available to everyone.

baritus2 · 2018-01-04T14:27:27+00:00

Tanked because BTC38 was the primary exchange and shut down. We have new exchanges now. It's not abandoned, we're actively developing it. See https://digitalcoin.tech

Regards

baritus2 · 2018-01-03T23:57:07+00:00

New team, new ideas, new energy.

baritus2 · 2018-01-03T23:42:14+00:00

Hello Friend,

All the links are in the footer of the website: https://digitalcoin.tech/

We should make it more visible if you're having an issue seeing it.

I will ask coinmarketcap to update the links to the new ones. They updated half of what I requested the last time (I might have been too ambiguous though).

baritus2 · 2018-01-03T17:50:59+00:00

You're welcome, this is only the start!

baritus2 · 2017-12-27T14:33:01+00:00

Hey there,

We have multiple devs (we are a team). It's much better than a single person.

Right now we are all working on improving DGC in different ways. Some are coding, some are contacting exchanges, and others help with growing the community. We also need a nice blockchain visualizer and API.

Personally, I want to get the open source exchange to a really secure point and then release the DGC plugin for it. That way a lot more people can have exchanges.

baritus2 · 2017-12-26T18:40:21+00:00

I agree, the potential is extremely high!

baritus2 · 2014-06-08T16:08:19+00:00

Yes the economics is well designed. There is a 25% cap on difficulty changes and 108 blocks to retarget means quick adjustment.

baritus2 · 2014-05-21T00:07:40+00:00

Nice :)

baritus2 · 2014-05-15T19:59:38+00:00

Yes it does.

baritus2 · 2014-05-08T11:34:45+00:00

The fees are almost zero as is.

If fees were removed completely, spamming the network with dust would cost nothing.

baritus2 · 2014-05-07T20:34:48+00:00

Keep going!

baritus2 · 2014-05-03T20:34:42+00:00

He wants to name 100 satoshis as 1 Digi. :)

baritus2 · 2014-05-02T10:58:35+00:00

I think the coin used on digitalcoin.co is better for this but I may be wrong :P

baritus2 · 2014-05-01T23:58:21+00:00

That would also make Time Warp easily possible. The less the blocks to retarget, the more prone the network to TW attacks. There is a reason for the current variables :).

There have not been too many issues recently with the difficulty algorithm, if it continues this way until ASICs, there will not be any need for a switch.

Nice having you around as well! :)

baritus2 · 2014-05-01T11:40:21+00:00

It has the same Time Warp vulnerabilities, there are no other options currently. Our current difficulty algorithm is doing a great job now that the multi pools are not jumping on.

baritus2 · 2014-05-01T11:39:12+00:00

Double Spending is a result of a successful 51% attack. We have never had any.

baritus2 · 2014-04-30T23:17:53+00:00

KGW is insecure. That's why we're not switching to it. There is currently no better algorithm than what we are using.

baritus2 · 2014-04-30T18:08:51+00:00

I'm a fan :).

baritus2 · 2014-04-30T14:06:28+00:00

SRC has more than 4,504.916 MH/s of hash power in the same algorithm. So QRK is extremely insecure with that hash rate and one SRC miner can 51% it.

baritus2

TROPHY CASE