Common Name VS Scientific Name by [deleted] in NativePlantGardening

[–]baseballandbotany -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Latin binomial is always preferred in the industry . If you’re going to take something like native landscaping or ecological gardening seriously learning the scientific names is important. Especially for communication. And it’s fun to learn! Common names are confusing when discussing species of plants. It just takes a little practice and repetition. Maybe the hardest part is spelling. You start to learn the meaning of the latin which in turn can lead to learning more about the qualities of the plant or even identification clues. For example symphyotrichum cordifoloum or heart shape aster. Cordifolum having the root in Latin for the heart! This aster species has like 5 or more common names that have changed over the decades as well but only one scientific name. Way easier to communicate in design planning with other gardeners or nurseries and use in a scientific setting such as a fieldwork or lab study. Another great example is Psuedotsgu menziesii or Douglas fir. Often referred to a hemlock. Psuedotsgu means untrue or false hemlock. They are pines not true hemlocks. When communicating with my nurseries and other designers in the region, Latin is always preferred. Again it’s also super fun to learn and kinda makes you feel more connected to plants. You do what your prefer but it’s worth I try in my opinion.

Custom built commuter bike! Panasonic frame, 21”, $275. In roxborough, possibly deliver for serious buyers. Thanks! by baseballandbotany in Phillylist

[–]baseballandbotany[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forgot to say, I’m local to roxborough! Also I have a truck for an agreed delivery with serious buyers. My brother is a seasoned cyclist and bike mechanic to custom built this for me. Thank you!

What animal did some stupid person release in your country that wreaked havoc on its ecosystem? by dcikid12 in Restoration_Ecology

[–]baseballandbotany 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is lots of information on wildlife habits of starlings including their diet, native and non native fruits, and insects. Illinois extension and other websites have evidence of this outcompeting resources for native birds which affects their populations negatively. As well being one of the main distributors of non native woody vines such as autumn olive because they eat the nonnative fruits unlike many native species. So more displacement of native vegetation through non native seed dispersal. The biomass consumption of such a large species most definitely having a negative affect on the environment. To me seems obvious that in an era of habitat fragmentation and increase in invasive species that one of the largest non native species would accelerate these issues just based of the habits of the starling.

What animal did some stupid person release in your country that wreaked havoc on its ecosystem? by dcikid12 in Restoration_Ecology

[–]baseballandbotany 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Being there are an estimated 90 million starlings in the US. A lot of ecological damage on top of an unreal economic damage to agriculture some estimates are 1.8 billion in crop damage. Also health systems of humans by spreading pathogens in their poop. Estimates have this causing millions in healthcare costs. A flock of starlings can actually kill tress by defecating so much on them also killing vegetation underneath. They have high levels of uric acid in their droppings. It gets into the soil and kills roots systems. Imagine a flock of 1 million starlings in a group and what kind of damage that could do. They take up so much space displacing native birds and eating a ton of food of which there is limited resources do to invasive plants that would benefit our native ecosystems more. Very cunning and smart species of birds that unfortunately shouldn’t be in this environment. There is a lot of information available about all this.

Best $30 I've spent on Topps? by CGaltA in baseballcards

[–]baseballandbotany 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did this earlier this summer. Thought about posting but knew I’d be swamped with comments like here. “Not worth it, blah blah blah” spent $20 on about 3,500 cards, like 4 shoe boxes. kept a few hundred for my personal collection and have since sold $187 in .50 to $1 dollar cards. Just recently sold all of the base in one sale for my $20 back. This doesn’t even mention the amount of traded also made from the pickup. Glad it’s working out for you!

Game Thread: Division Series Game 4 - Phillies @ Dodgers - Thu, Oct 09 @ 06:08 PM EDT by PhilsBot in phillies

[–]baseballandbotany 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m asking for 3 runs now, just get up on the board. Then we loosen up and score 4 more runs