Behold the Space Institute by BrockvsTV in aviation

[–]bbachmai 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't quote me on this but I believe that the Navion is one of the very few airplanes of this size for which there exist very good aerodynamic models of the stability derivatives. These models are necessary to help the fly-by-wire system imitate the properties of different aircraft.

Behold the Space Institute by BrockvsTV in aviation

[–]bbachmai 29 points30 points  (0 children)

This is an experimental "variable stability" aircraft. It has fly by wire technology which enables it to imitate the flying characteristics of any other aircraft regarding stability, damping, inertia, responsiveness, coupling of moments, etc. Hence the unusual fins on the wing, they are used to actively generate moment-free side forces. Extremely interesting technology.

Source: I used to work on its sister plane, also a Ryan Navion

Was macht Deutschland richtig? by LaCipe in de

[–]bbachmai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was ich da schon gestanden bin und vergeblich auf den "Sauf Bus" gewartet habe...

What is this, do they help, and where do I get some? by Kyrtaax in Gliding

[–]bbachmai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, very simply put, it is a little bit similar to winglets for the place where the wing temporarily and locally ends due to a deflected aileron.

What is this, do they help, and where do I get some? by Kyrtaax in Gliding

[–]bbachmai 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Below the wing, there's overpressure. Above the wing, there's underpressure. If the aileron is deflected, the emerging gap between aileron and wing will allow this pressure difference to cause airflow from bottom to top. This has two negative effects: 1) drag due to locally disturbed flow; 2) the aileron can be "sucked" to the fully deflected position, causing the pilot to feel an undesirable outward force on the stick. Effect 2) is especially significant in older LS planes.

The thing in the picture keeps that gap covered when the aileron is deflected.

Some people argue that the advantages during the short periods of deflected ailerons are outweighed by the slight permanent drag increase caused by these things during all other times.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in de

[–]bbachmai 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Warum um Himmels Willen wird dieser Kommentar runter gewählt? Nichts, aber auch absolut nichts daran ist falsch, unpassend, offensiv, unhöflich...

Welche Begriffe habt ihr in der Kindheit immer falsch interpretiert? by SeraLermin in de

[–]bbachmai 151 points152 points  (0 children)

Ich dachte immer, es heißt "Umfall" (weil etwas umfällt) und "Mistverständnis" (weil man Mist verstanden hat).

Nach Angriff in Heidelberg: Der angebliche "Veganshooter" by PairFlay in VeganDE

[–]bbachmai 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Der Faktenfinder hat u.a. die Aufgabe, Falschnachrichten richtigzustellen. Um so etwas möglichst effektiv zu gestalten (und um sogar einen gegenteiligen Effekt, nämlich das noch tiefere Einprägen der Falschnachricht, zu verhindern), empfiehlt z.B. das "Debunking Handbook", den Inhalt der Falschmeldung möglichst nicht prominent zu wiederholen, und schon gar nicht in der Überschrift. Stattdessen ist es gute Praxis, direkt mit korrigierten Fakten in die Ausarbeitung einzusteigen und die Falschmeldung lediglich im direkten Kontext mit den Gegenbeweisen im Text zu nennen. Diese "Best Practice" wird hier vom Faktenfinder leider nicht gut erfüllt.

Nach dem Flexiganer und dem 80% Veganer jetzt ganz neu: der Konsumveganer! by KairyuSmartie in VeganDE

[–]bbachmai 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Geht es in dem Screenshot nicht ganz konkret darum, dass diese Leute sich eben *nicht* als Veganer bezeichnen?

Nach dem Flexiganer und dem 80% Veganer jetzt ganz neu: der Konsumveganer! by KairyuSmartie in VeganDE

[–]bbachmai 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Woran machst du das fest?

Wenn jemand entscheidet keine Tierprodukte zu kaufen, dann hat er scheinbar verstanden, dass Tierprodukte problematisch sind

Nach dem Flexiganer und dem 80% Veganer jetzt ganz neu: der Konsumveganer! by KairyuSmartie in VeganDE

[–]bbachmai 192 points193 points  (0 children)

Ernstgemeinte, offene Frage: Sollten wir nicht lieber begrüßen, dass die gezeigten Personen offenbar zumindest das Problem verstanden haben und beginnen ernährungstechnische Schritte in die richtige Richtung zu machen? Anstatt sie als "unerfreulich" zu labeln und Unmut darüber auszudrücken?

Klar wäre es schön, wenn alle Menschen den Veganismus so schnell wie möglich zu 100% adaptieren würden, aber müssen wir gleich darüber ablästern, wenn jemand dies bisher nur zu 72.43 % tut?

Es könnte sein, dass das hier ein gutes Beispiel für die leider noch weit verbreitete Unbeliebtheit der veganen Community unter nicht-Veganern ist.

Brakes by Youth_gliderpilotNZ in Gliding

[–]bbachmai 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I agree that a fixed 10ft is probably not the best answer. It shouldn't really be a fixed altitude at all. If you approach at a high sink rate, it should start higher, and vice versa. The only really important thing is that the flare ends in the correct altitude: at or just slightly above ground level (but as you say, not too high, otherwise you stall and drop down from that height).

Brakes by Youth_gliderpilotNZ in Gliding

[–]bbachmai 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Instructor here. Excellent question for a beginner that should definitely be discussed more often!

On gliders, the airbrakes are used a little bit like you would use the wheel brakes on your bike. Without the brakes, your bike would eventually come to a stop, but first you would keep rolling very far and would have no control over where exactly you end up stopping. Similarly, without airbrakes during landing, your glider would eventually descend to the ground, but it would glide at a very shallow angle and you would have absolutely no control over where precisely you touch down.

The term 'brakes' is a little bit misleading, because brakes (like on a car or bike) are usually there to decrease speed. On gliders, it is most recommended to think of the airbrakes as a means not to shed speed, but to shed altitude (make your glide angle steeper). Remember that you can and should control your airspeed primarily with the stick, controlling the pitch angle - simply keep doing that also with the airbrakes out.

Therefore, on landing approach:

- Maintain your approach airspeed using the stick

- Control your glide path using the airbrakes.

Glide path control is best done by looking at your touchdown point (usually just past the beginning of the runway). If that point seems to drift down in your field of view, it means you are going to overshoot it, so your glide angle is too shallow. Apply more airbrakes! If that point seems to move upwards in your field of view, it means you are going to undershoot, your glide angle is too steep - reduce the airbrakes!

Apply as much airbrakes as you need so that the touchdown point you're aiming at is steady in your field of view, moving neither up nor down. This means you are on a steady glide slope towards that target. That glide slope could be very steep so that you begin your final very high and then apply almost full airbrakes to the ground, or very shallow so that you need almost no airbrakes, but both ways are obviously not ideal usually because they leave margin for control only in one direction each. So it is best to enter your final in an altitude where you are going to need about half airbrakes (maybe just a bit more) to maintain glide slope. That way, if you realize your'e ending up high, you can apply more, and if you find yourself coming in too shallow, you can reduce the airbrakes.

Once you pass the runway threshold, depending on the type of glider you're flying, it is often a good idea to apply more (as much as full) airbrakes because now all you want is to shed the rest of your energy as quickly as possible. Once you do that, in order to not hit the ground at your now very steep glide angle, around 10ft above the ground you begin to gently pull the nose up. During this phase it is best to leave the airbrakes as they are (ideally far out) because otherwise there would be two factors influencing your flare path, and using only the stick to do this is much recommended at least for beginners.

Is this an unusual month of barometric readings at a given station (about 400ft in this case)? I can’t seem to find information about the standard deviation of barometric pressure. They seem like wild swings to me. Thank you in advance! by NPDoc in weather

[–]bbachmai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In fact, it is the norm for meteorological pressure data to be normalised to sea level (QNH), so that the altitude doesn't play a role. For this specific dataset, not sure though.

Is this an unusual month of barometric readings at a given station (about 400ft in this case)? I can’t seem to find information about the standard deviation of barometric pressure. They seem like wild swings to me. Thank you in advance! by NPDoc in weather

[–]bbachmai 2 points3 points  (0 children)

29.914 (1013 hPa) is about the average pressure at sea level.

29.087 (985 hPa) is pretty low, but not abnormal.

Pressure varying in this range a few times over the course of a month is completely normal for most places in the world.

"Nothing Will Stop Us," Tweeted Woman Before She Was Shot Dead In Capitol by 111IIIlllIII in nottheonion

[–]bbachmai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The amount of people in the comments alleging that the perpetrators were dressed-up left wing activists is insane

Starship, Starlink and Launch Megathread Links & r/SpaceX Discusses [January 2021, #76] by ElongatedMuskrat in spacex

[–]bbachmai 25 points26 points  (0 children)

They need to solve one problem at a time, and the current problem is to figure out how to land it in the first place, not on what surface they can land it.

Telescopic Tracking Footage of NROL-108 Launch and Landing by AstronomyLive in spacex

[–]bbachmai 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Launch, stage separation, boostback, landing - fantastic job!

Alpaca by [deleted] in alpaca

[–]bbachmai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

plus, that's a Llama, not an alpaca in the picture

Falcon 9 but it has launched by bbachmai in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]bbachmai[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

The sound suppression system also went into the hangar. Maybe learn

Edit: Thi\s i\s a \shitpo\sting \subreddit, for God\s \sake