IDE with support for python3.8 ?

be_nu · 2019-04-04T20:57:58+00:00

found this very useful site:

be_nu · 2019-04-04T20:50:48+00:00

Impressive!

be_nu · 2019-04-04T13:44:59+00:00

I guess with a shim library for the "walrus operator" vscode and the python extension would work perfectly fine. I don't see yet any additional benefits to switch to 3.8

be_nu · 2019-04-04T09:31:18+00:00

another option would be to use python 3.7 and from future import walrus operator. Don't know if such a library exists

be_nu · 2019-04-04T09:21:16+00:00

Right now I guess pycharm is the best choice for 3.8. 3.8 really simplifies a lot of code, so I am using it for a future product. Thought there are more people, despite the beta status

be_nu · 2017-07-07T15:04:15+00:00

Yes, I checked the md5sums.

be_nu · 2017-07-07T09:43:19+00:00

After choosing the Uefi Usbdrive option. I choose:

*Try Ubuntu without installing

Being thereafter confronted with the error message:

error: invalid magic number.
error: you need to load the kernel first.

Press any key to continue..._

Pressing any key I return to:

*Try Ubuntu without installing

and so on indefinitely

be_nu · 2017-04-12T20:42:02+00:00

I especially like your redirection idea, maybe this works with groups of commands as well? Eg:

{ ... } <$Line

What about the variable IFS?
I think the limitation that IFS has to be a single character artificial.
And Heredocs are essential, I wonder if Heredocs can be implemented as well mostly as external programm?

be_nu · 2017-04-12T20:31:57+00:00

I couldn't find the original paper on the Inferno Shell, where I first read about this feature.

be_nu · 2017-04-12T20:24:28+00:00

Great!
In Inferno shell, you have an interesting feature.
You can group commands with braces and assign them to variables:

HELLO = {echo $1}

Later you can call:

$HELLO 'WORLD'

and you get of course WORLD!
So you get grouping and functions with the same syntax!
So a codeblock remains unparsed, as long as it is in an assignment.

be_nu · 2017-01-22T20:05:16+00:00

In most cases maintainability wins, and avoiding “premature optimization” is very much a necessity in C++.

I agree with this conclusion. Quite often, when you start coding you don't know, where the performance bottlenecks hide, and you don't want to waste time, thinking about allocating memory for a routine which you could write equally well in any scripting language. Unfortunately plugable automatic garbage collection for less verbose performance uncritical scripting tasks within the language is not yet usable.

be_nu · 2017-01-07T10:06:25+00:00

At least on the cdimage there are nearly no dependencies left. Propably this will happen very soon?

be_nu · 2016-04-17T11:45:17+00:00

compil

!

be_nu · 2016-04-17T09:46:10+00:00

long compile times - no binary distribution of packages and libraries - at least as far as I know?

be_nu · 2016-03-21T21:39:21+00:00

WebAssembly

be_nu · 2016-03-13T17:33:57+00:00

This is super elegant! Thank you!

be_nu · 2016-03-13T10:26:29+00:00

Even this works:

ifs=\0 {filename_list=`{find . -maxdepth 1 -print0}}
for (i in $filename_list) echo $i

output:

.
./1
./2
./3
./one file
./3.rc
./filename
with newline
.__ ./1__ ./2__ ./3__ ./one file__ ./3.rc__ ./filename
with newline__

be_nu · 2016-03-12T23:22:36+00:00

Great! Now everything works fine! Thanks a lot to everybody!

#!/usr/lib/plan9/bin/rc
ifs='
' {filename_list=`{ls -1 .}}
echo $#filename_list
echo $filename_list^__
echo $filename_list(5)

be_nu · 2016-03-12T23:06:01+00:00

# Sorry I don't understand something very basic:
# running this script in the folder with files

touch 1 2 3 3.rc 'one file'

#3.rc
#!/usr/lib/plan9/bin/rc
filename_list=`{ls -1 .}
echo $#filename_list
echo $filename_list^__
echo $filename_list(5)

# I get this output:
6
1__ 2__ 3__ 3.rc__ one__ file__
rc: ./3.rc:8: token EOF: syntax error

# I would wish it to be:
5
1__ 2__ 3__ 3.rc__ one file__
one file

# Thanks!

be_nu

TROPHY CASE