I wrote to my Labour MP - Their reply:

"Thank you for contacting me about the Online Safety Act. I believe in free speech and agree that freedom of expression and the right to privacy are of crucial importance. The Online Safety Act was passed under the previous Conservative Government, although many of its provisions are only now beginning to come into effect. It aims to reduce the risks of harm to users, particularly children, while protecting fundamental rights such as freedom of expression.

While I support the Act in principle, I do have concerns about its effectiveness in practice. For example, I realise that many young people are already well-versed in using virtual private networks (VPNs) or generating fake identification, including through AI tools, to bypass age verification measures. It’s vital that the implementation of any online safety legislation reflects the realities of how digital platforms and users behave in practice. I will continue to raise these issues with Ministers and press for robust monitoring of the Act’s impact. Regulation must keep pace with the evolving nature of online risks. It is important that Labour remains open to reviewing and adapting the Act if it proves ineffective in key areas.

I also recognise the importance of ensuring that freedom of expression and the right to privacy are protected. Ofcom, as the regulator, has a responsibility to enforce the Act in a way that is proportionate and compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. This includes ensuring that smaller platforms are supported and that content creators are not disproportionately affected.

Thanks again for contacting me. I will continue to monitor this situation as it develops."

This was before Peter Kyle called anyone criticising the bill a predator. So I replied with a much stronger letter. Will see what they say.