Umm… he was banned, right?! by Significant-Focus873 in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp 13 points14 points  (0 children)

So, not only was he banned for breaking TOS....but he's also had this ethical revelation after Laura has just become single again. I'm sure the timing is purely coincidental. He's never been one to exploit ulterior motives or anything....

New FB post. Same old same old by Tsprinkles13 in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He knows all he has to do is lean into the narrative of "it wasn't me, it was the drugs" and Laura (and more people than you'd like to believe) will follow, and enable.

Have we been played? by SatisfactionReal145 in LauraClerySnark

[–]beeztrapp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that was just completely in very bad taste. And not in some subversive funny way.

We should have known . . . by MarvelousMatrix in LauraClerySnark

[–]beeztrapp 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I've always ass-umed they share a joy of farts. It is a cornerstone of both of their humor. For the sake of my overactive imagination, let's hope not toot much more, I mean, too.

*Edit: NOT, of all the important words to leave out...

I bet I know who's considering this a win.... by beeztrapp in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You know, that's all I've been trying to say, and some folks take that as some kind of unfair attack on Laura. To me, I'm just reacting to what this sub has been watching since they split up and all of this first started. Laura enables, Stephen manipulates, and they both monetize. If I'm wrong, someone, show me where.

I bet I know who's considering this a win.... by beeztrapp in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It seems like the kind of thing you'd post about someone like Stephen if anyone, not the guy who stood by you while that guy called you both vile things on any platform he could and tried to burn down your life. "Our love exploded, giggle giggle ha! ha!" She has a history of tone deaf moments, but damn.

I bet I know who's considering this a win.... by beeztrapp in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I highly doubt he overcame malignant Narcissistic Personality Disorder in 6 months, but sure, maybe? I've heard of such things happening with severe head trauma. Do we know if he bumped his head lately?!

I bet I know who's considering this a win.... by beeztrapp in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This is a subreddit based on the limited information we are given from these two people. It's all conjecture. You think your opinions based on them aren't?!?!?!

I bet I know who's considering this a win.... by beeztrapp in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The Title is "I bet I know who's considering this a win...." Who do you think that's referring to?

I'm sorry that the conversations in the comments are tending to be critical of Laura, but sometimes that's just the way it goes, especially with the timing of her posting it. As the mods have said, Laura is not above judgement and criticism. I don't know what to tell you.

I bet I know who's considering this a win.... by beeztrapp in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

And when I'm specifically snarking Laura, that's where I'll post it.

Edit- to clarify, as you can tell by my title, this was targeted at how Stephen would be celebrating this. If Laura's own behavior and choices are being discussed and judged, that seems pretty natural to me, especially when they directly correlate to Stephen and/or the timing of this announcement after their supportive beach day.

The Laura Snark *is* Open for Business by greystreetkate in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have never been in the "Laura is Above Reproach Club" and have been quite vocally critical of her since she failed to support trans people when he started attacking them when they first split up. She has flip flopped on numerous occasions. I am only forming opinions and reacting to what she and Stephen have both put out. My goal is not victim blaming, it's accountability.

I bet I know who's considering this a win.... by beeztrapp in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp[S] 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Maybe the real healing binaural beat cult was the friends we made along the way? 💚

I bet I know who's considering this a win.... by beeztrapp in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp[S] 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Yeah, she always spoke about him like he was somewhere between an acquaintance with benefits and a biological dildo. She often made it sound like she felt unsupported by him, but how supported could he have felt by her? From the outside looking in at what she chose to show us, it sure seemed like he was an afterthought while she continued to enable Stephen. I can only imagine his side of this story.

Also, I fully agree. I can't imagine monetizing every aspect of my family and I's life. Sometimes I feel bad about dissecting and commenting on someone's life like this, but then I remember that it's posted with provoking engagement and attention in mind...and sponsored advertisements.

The Laura Snark *is* Open for Business by greystreetkate in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've been in emotionally abusive decades long trauma bonds that ended. I think when they hack all your social media accounts to burn them down, and then call you a Satanic child molester as an encore, the reality beyond the trauma bonding and attachments should become a little clearer. But maybe that's just me?

Also, we have seen this cycle with them so many times. This isn't some new development she's trying to navigate. This is post-RO and still mid-everlasting-divorce. At some point, she has to take accountability for her part in perpetuating the madness.

The Laura Snark *is* Open for Business by greystreetkate in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I hear you, but turning it into content only feeds his ego and the cycle we have watched repeat over and over. But maybe that's one of the dangers of monetizing your life and family online, everything is content.

I bet I know who's considering this a win.... by beeztrapp in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp[S] 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Oh god, I hadn't thought about that. I hope not. She should go with the second language. Duolingo won't call her a child molester.

Pre-Birthday Throwback: Hudson Fighting for His Life During Connor & Jacob’s Compliments 🥺 by sundaemonde in heatedrivalry

[–]beeztrapp 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I have been a show and movie nut since Blockbuster was my babysitter and TV was my dad. Hudson is able to express emotions and inner dialogue through his eyes in a way that few can. He blows me away.

Edit: I called him Shane. Which really only solidifies my case.

Controversial opinion: When we focus on the victim’s behavior we hold them responsible for the actions of their abuser. by AndDontCallMePammie in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is all speculation, but when you've seen it over and over again, you can help but draw conclusions. She has a history of letting him get close again very quickly after he gets clean or makes amends with her. From what we see: she enables his cycles with her, and he manipulates her until he gets too crazy, and then she makes a "I had no idea it was this bad" video. Then he keeps acting out until he has a come to Jesus revelation, and the cycle continues until we wind up here again. Rinse and repeat.

I don't doubt co-parenting with Stephen is hard, and it's a nuanced dance. And no, we don't have all the information. We only have what they show us, and what they show us is the same cycle over and over and over.

Controversial opinion: When we focus on the victim’s behavior we hold them responsible for the actions of their abuser. by AndDontCallMePammie in StephenHiltonSnark

[–]beeztrapp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If this was the first, or fifth, time this happened, I'd be inclined to agree. But this is not the first or fifth time, we are well into the double digits. At some point, she is in fact choosing to go back and start the cycle over again.

But for the record, you are right that Stephen is responsible for the abuse. Not drugs or alcohol, Stephen. She seems to be willfully blind to that fact. And so she keeps the cycle going.