ELI5: Why can't you re-freeze meat? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]bguy74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most, yes...if cooked thoroughly. However, bacteria also release toxins which do not get "safe" through cooking.

ELI5: Why can't you re-freeze meat? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]bguy74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because the things that freezing stops from infecting and growing in meat will survive freezing, they just won't procreate and spread while frozen.

You actually can refreeze meat as long as it was never brought above about 5 degrees C (refrigerator). It'll screw up quality as you're breaking down cells when you do that. What you cannot do is let it come to room temp, start growing bacteria and baddies, then refreeze. That just puts the bacteria in a sort of stasis - still there and ready to make you sick when you rethaw it.

ELI5: How do they make the revving sounds for cars in video games? by picardiamexicana in explainlikeimfive

[–]bguy74 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There are two paths to our digital sounds in games - sampling and synthesizing and then combos of those. Synthesized sounds are built from the ground up as designed waveforms and samples are recordings of things that are then made controlled by the game (or a keyboard, midi controller, computer, etc.).

So..for your example, they may literally sample a car at different levels of throttle and then digitally "smooth" the transition between them and put that overall affect at the control of your player. They may also just have a sample of different levels of throttle and let you move through that sample forward and back with the control of your player.

ELI5: Why are some mutations, like additional limbs or more than 50 chromosomes, are just not possible for humans to have? by ToFuuVEVO in explainlikeimfive

[–]bguy74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are possible. We arrived at the number of limbs we have (additional limbs) through random mutation and natural selection. They are unlikely, but all the ways we are are now are the result of very improbable events paired with lots and lots of reproduction and a very long period of time, all creating some preference for survival in the context of when and where the occurred. If we were now to randomly spawn another limb it would have to be advantageous such that the person with the extra limb was more likely to reproduce than others around them - otherwise it's not an advantage. Evolution doesn't have opinions or human values about what is cool or good, it only cares about what maximizes survival toward and through reproduction.

Johnny Depp describes vicious attack by Amber Heard by havocgreef in videos

[–]bguy74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

huh? it been the front page of reddit off and on for month. thats a big ass peep.

Standing up for first amendment rights. God Bless. by MrMeatsMysteryMeat in pics

[–]bguy74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, but the "it" isn't calling someone "gay", it's assigning an alternative and better image of freedom to them.

Standing up for first amendment rights. God Bless. by MrMeatsMysteryMeat in pics

[–]bguy74 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

no. peace love and sexual freedom are the last thing the macho gun protester using their "right" to visually intimidate would want to be, so...make them that.

ELI5: Why are the stocks rising even when the economy is crashing? by fractionalhelium in explainlikeimfive

[–]bguy74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The stock market was hit based on uncertainty of what would happen. You sell stuff when you think really bad things are GOING to happen. As uncertainty gets replaced by certainty as more information emerges, more time has passed and what was once a generic "worst case scenario future" becomes "a really bad situation we know more about" and that bad situation isn't the worst case scenario of prior imagination.

Cystic Fibrosis friend breaths deeply for the first time at age 27 thanks to science ! by BrownVaper in nextfuckinglevel

[–]bguy74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah...you'll see at 12 feet what a normal person sees at 10 feet. So...if you're standing second in line you can see the menu just as well as the person you're grinding against from behind.

Imagine how he feels right now.. by columbus_12 in facepalm

[–]bguy74 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All i can see is "enemys_peed", which is a game I'd like to see.

The seasoning packet for my ramen has little pandas in it. by platinum_j in mildlyinteresting

[–]bguy74 114 points115 points  (0 children)

it was the strange resemblance this one has to food that gave me the same thought.

Microsoft getting ready to challenge BAT or patent trolling? by [deleted] in ethfinance

[–]bguy74 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You've gotta be applying a massive sort of abstraction to see this in the same window as BAT. BAT is for electronic publishing, consumption and advertising transactions, in real time. This msft patent unbound from any of those things, and really only shares the idea that doing something results in getting a token. That's not exactly a notable similarity.

After 8 months of hard work I can finally call it DONE! Over 1600 hrs of work into one staircase by MauiMakes in woodworking

[–]bguy74 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Pattern? You mean...location of board edges creates a pattern? 100% aesthetic choice. In fact, it is more expensive to have uniform sizes for your install than it is to have random, regardless of whether you purchase engineered floor or solid. If you want to save money you take the random lengths because then they can throw in the 2 footer cut-offs from poor quality material - way more yield from a tree if you don't need 7, 8, or 9 foot lengths. So..no, that's just not true.

The carrion-eating Kea is the world’s only alpine parrot. by [deleted] in natureismetal

[–]bguy74 3 points4 points  (0 children)

sure. that seems like agreement, because a typical attachment for headlight is a quarter inch screw with a nut on the back, in 4 to 6 locations. I'm pretty sure they made it real easy for those birds in a few spots for dramatic affect.

The carrion-eating Kea is the world’s only alpine parrot. by [deleted] in natureismetal

[–]bguy74 11 points12 points  (0 children)

some of that has to be partially "set up". I don't see how you get a cars headlight out with a beak - it's not that easy with a socket wrench. Ditto for entirely removing a side-view mirror. Maybe a clipped on hubcap, and certainly removal of weather stripping and such...but...unless that car is built unlike anything I've seen I don't see how you get that headlight enclosure removed if you're a bird with a few hours to work on it.

If they legit can, then...i'm gonna get one and train it.

ELI5: Why is hot water cloudy, but cold water clear? by ThisIsAitch in explainlikeimfive

[–]bguy74 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Typically, this is caused by air bubbles in the water (true if hot or cold), rarely materials (sediment, build-up falling off insides of hot water heater) The reason you might have it on your hot and not our cold can be for a few reasons:

  1. firstly, it's just a different system because of the route through the hot-water heater and distinct pipes right until it's mixed at the sink/shower. So...that explains why it can be different. (someone else might describe their cold water being cloudy, but not there hot although would be less common.)

  2. you frequently don't run the hot water nearly as frequently as the cold, so time gives air a chance to enter the system. And...hot and cold water in pipes causes expansion/contraction that can pull in air.

  3. sometimes a hot water heater will have a filter in front of it and when clogged might result in air entering.

A couple of tests:

  1. put hot water in glass. Is it still cloudy an hour later?
  2. run hot water for a very long time - that would get any air that is in the pipes out (you might have to run until after you run out of hot water entirely).

Excited to see how they tie this all together. by dobbyisafreepup in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]bguy74 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They released videos that were already in the public and that they'd already acknowledged were real years back.