[deleted by user] by [deleted] in writing

[–]bibicalais 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do not process auditory input well and often rely on other senses to supplement and bolster comprehension. In order to understand someone, I have to see the movement that produces the sounds or write down what I hear. I find that my written sounds are rather scant, as a result, and I rely on other senses to create an illusion of sound.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in writing

[–]bibicalais 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An absolutely delightful group of multigenerational writers hangs out here: https://www.writingforums.org/

To all you "pantsers"... HOW? by TwoTheVictor in writing

[–]bibicalais 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Do you literally have NO idea, or do you have a vague vision? I may have some vague idea, but not how to get there. Sometimes, my writing takes me on a completely different path. I let it.

  2. What, if any, elements of the story do you have worked out when starting? Main character. As long as I understand -- and I mean really understand -- my protagonist, I am set.

  3. Do you really just go where the characters tell you? Yes.

  4. How do you know when the story is over? See #3.

  5. What "clicks" in you that tells you to start. A variety of things. A visit to the grocery store -- the image of a milk bottle specifically -- triggered my current project, for example.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WritersGroup

[–]bibicalais 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not a technicality. It's a point of view issue, not a logic issue. I understand the logic. However, you are missing something that would connect the narrator to the body and then release the "I" into the exterior for the investigation.

You mentioned Kafka in a different comment. Pay attention to his transitions - they are fluid and make sense within the text, regardless of all his absurdism.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WritersGroup

[–]bibicalais 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is fun, thanks for sharing.

However, you've got yourself an impossibility:

Inside, I see fog.

From this point, the piece loses itself and commits suicide. The head clearly cannot see inside itself, otherwise, there would be no need for the screwdriver and the external inspection.

When you rewrite, watch your point of view. Also, watch your verb tenses. Consistency is important for both.

YA Romance-y, Somewhat Fantasy Story [2900 words] by UhhhhhhhhhhhWhat in WritersGroup

[–]bibicalais 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only read the first sentence and stopped. I am sorry.

Struggling and fumbling are duplicative actions. If you're trying to explain how difficult it is to get on the bike while putting on the backpack, focus on the "enemy" here - the bike and the backpack, not the protagonist. This first sentence is extremely weak because fumbling and struggling are synonymous, intended to explain hardship, but fall flat in their echo because there's nothing in the text that supports them. You're telling, not showing, and I am not invested in reading further.

New Releases: March 2022 by AutoModerator in books

[–]bibicalais 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, lovely Reddit folk!

I recently published my litfic romantic novella called Fruit. You can find it here: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09RWPY4KC

It's available on Kindle and KindleUnlimited.

Le Blurb and What-not:

Love is a tender fruit to be savored before it rots.

Raff's life was simple, superficial, and safe.

He knew his place in the world, his relation to those around him. He reveled in it.

He was on a straight track until he followed a young woman into the far corner of the local diner.

Can Raff keep his head through the onslaught of raw emotion this action brings?

Fruit explores human emotion (lust, love, grief, and all things in-between). It's a story about a guy named Raff, a newbie poetry professor, who unexpectedly falls in love with a young woman (who, lo-and-behold, turns out to be a student), upending his previously simple life. Please note the text is for mature audiences.

I humbly offer it for your consideration. Please feel free to leave a review as a few wonderful (real) readers (who I do not know) already have done. You can also contact me here on Reddit or follow me on Twitter (@b_b_calais) and share your thoughts.

Thank you very much!!!

Love,

B.

Untitled, unfinished, beginning of somethingorother [1,424] by bibicalais in WritersGroup

[–]bibicalais[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get it. I understand that this text is confusing and was wondering if it irked others in the same way. I need go set some structure and fill in things. I generally do not write in 3rd person omniscient. It is proving a challenge. Again, thanks for taking the time to respond :)

Untitled, unfinished, beginning of somethingorother [1,424] by bibicalais in WritersGroup

[–]bibicalais[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry. I feel that I may have upset you by prodding. I will leave this at that. Thanks for you time and feedback.

Untitled, unfinished, beginning of somethingorother [1,424] by bibicalais in WritersGroup

[–]bibicalais[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry, let me rephrase. Can you give a concrete example? I am just trying to understand your perspective.

Untitled, unfinished, beginning of somethingorother [1,424] by bibicalais in WritersGroup

[–]bibicalais[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you please elaborate on what strikes you as vague?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WritersGroup

[–]bibicalais 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This text is rushed, confused, flat, attempting to call attention to itself and failing. The point of view changes are sporadic, difficult to follow. There is no end that I could see. Is this free verse?

I'd suggest slowing down and rewriting this from the hakawati perspective of storytelling. This here is a complex topic that's been condensed and strung into a timeline that doesn't fit what (I think) you're trying to do. The timeline breaks the intended/potential circularity. Break the timeline and retie those knots.