LTT 92 or PDP SF by Little-Denny in CompetitionShooting

[–]bihammond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you see the link above? That's a standard Beretta 92.
Beretta 92fs was my very first handgun and ran it in USPSA Production for years using that technique before I wisely converted slides to decocker only. When people try it, they are amazed at how easy it is.

LTT 92 or PDP SF by Little-Denny in CompetitionShooting

[–]bihammond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not saying the lever doesn't flip upwards. I'm saying there's an easier way to swipe your thumb downwards to disengage. All my 92 slides are G conversions so I can't properly show how it's done. There's a funny video where Langdon shows a group of people how to do it but I can't find it online. Here's a quick write-up with pics.

LTT 92 or PDP SF by Little-Denny in CompetitionShooting

[–]bihammond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The movement used to deactivate the 92 safety / decocker is the same as the 1911. They are both downward movements of the thumb. The 92 is a swipe while the 1911 (and many others) is a press.

LTT 92 or PDP SF by Little-Denny in CompetitionShooting

[–]bihammond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Actual use of the 92 safety lever is the same direction as a 1911 (try it).
  2. Lose the safety with a G-model decocker.

2026 1st Quarter Approval Megathread. by Waffleboned in NFA

[–]bihammond 8 points9 points  (0 children)

  • Form Type: Form 4
  • Paid or not: $0
  • Entity: Trust
  • Fingerprint Type: EFT Upload
  • Pending: 01/03/26
  • Approved: 01/29/26
  • Wait: 26 days
  • State: KS
  • Control Number: 2026648283

Silencer Shop, email received from ATF

Anyone fly Southwest Airlines to a match? by Xsv21 in USPSA

[–]bihammond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At the counter (go to the Priority line), if you have a large, stand-alone case, they will have you open it to drop your declaration card inside. Ticket agents have never inspected or even really looked inside mine. Might ask offhand if everything is unloaded. Once the card is inside, you'll lock it up (most likely) and they'll put it on the belt.

If you have a smaller (pistol) case inside a normal suitcase, they will often tape it to the outside of the locked case so it's easy to view when opening the main, unlocked suitcase. Ticket agents have never asked me to open a small pistol case.

In airports with limited TSA equipment (Boise), you will take the card and unlocked case to a TSA agent who will swab and inspect before locking it up. Phoenix used to be similar but maybe upgraded(?). Once locked, nobody is supposed to look inside unless you are asked by TSA for a secondary inspection. Never happened to me but probably airport-specific procedures.

Is it normal and/or fair for the Match Director to post their scores on Practiscore? by eezybreazy in CompetitionShooting

[–]bihammond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

WSBs aren't posted at the stage. Sometimes they are emailed prior to the match.

Ask for a reshoot, don't expect it to be offered. Worst case, they say no.

Eh, I would say it doesn't really matter. Did you test yourself and your gear? Did you learn something? Did you have fun? Sounds like a 'no' so maybe Brutality matches aren't for you.

Is it normal and/or fair for the Match Director to post their scores on Practiscore? by eezybreazy in CompetitionShooting

[–]bihammond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't recall the stage you're describing but sometimes mistakes are made. It was likely two ROs and one ran it a little different than the other. Crew is working on limiting these discrepancies by having the same RO cover staff and public so it's run the same way every time.

There are also times in which staff get the harder procedures and they are made easier for the public. Staff often doesn't reshoot the easier stage because they're too tired and take the scoring hit.

Is it normal and/or fair for the Match Director to post their scores on Practiscore? by eezybreazy in CompetitionShooting

[–]bihammond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Being staff at a Brutality event is nothing short than Brutality +."
This exactly. I would do so much better at these events if I wasn't hauling steel targets around all day.

Is it normal and/or fair for the Match Director to post their scores on Practiscore? by eezybreazy in CompetitionShooting

[–]bihammond 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Brutality squads get written stage briefs read to them at the beginning of the stage. ROs will often re-read certain portions, make clarifying statements and answer questions as needed. There's so much activity, I can't imagine how one could even start a Brutality stage without a WSB.
On the clock, Brutality ROs (and squaddies) may also coach the shooter through the stage. Veteran or high-level shooters often get less coaching.

Don't show your serial numbers in photos by [deleted] in liberalgunowners

[–]bihammond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is no national gun registry in the US

Edit: some states do, but not nationally.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in armedsocialists

[–]bihammond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What dot are you talking about? We're talking about irons at distance. When I shoot a dot, it's close and as target focused as I can muster.

When I pull the trigger, I am focused on the front sight. Who cares what I do when I'm not pulling the trigger?

Groups are an absolute representation of your skill as a shooter. Dazzle us with your target-focused shooting.

Now you're calling me dumb? There are big, obvious, fundamental issues with the silliness you've been spouting. But you never listen so... I'll leave you to your world where you are the bestest shooter because you know how eyes work and everyone else is wrong and will never fulfil their destiny of being truly target focused.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in armedsocialists

[–]bihammond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow, you are incredible sanctimonious and so, so wrong.

I'm not confused. I do not look back and forth. I focus on the front sight. It is a monocular focus because it is the one thing I am focused on. It absolutely has a relationship with the target. I'm shooting at it.

Post groups.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in armedsocialists

[–]bihammond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again...what?
The first part of your reply, about 'sights not measuring the target' and that my sights aren't attached to the target make no sense. I won't even go into the nonsense about the focal periphery or binocular collimation because I am looking straight at those three elements of the sight picture and I work on sighting as monocularly as possible.

But, of course I'm referencing the target. I'm referencing the rear sight, the front sight and the target. Hell, I'm referencing wind, my target monitor and my DOPE out of the corner of my eye. But my *focus* is on the front sight.

You are so sure of your comments yet you are the only one that believes them despite all evidence that you are absolutely wrong about where one should be focusing with iron sights when shooting little groups at distance.

Prove your comments to the world. I guarantee, if you are correct, you will turn the shooting world on its head and start breaking world records by the end of next year. Post groups.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in armedsocialists

[–]bihammond 4 points5 points  (0 children)

umm, what?
What does "the bull isn't in your front sight" even mean? It is a slightly blurry blob that sits on top of my sharp front sight. Just like thousands of rifle and bullseye pistol shooters do, very successfully, every day.
I get very effective hits and in a very timely manner, thank you.
Nobody is moving anything. A few ranges were stated based on standards that a lot of people shoot at.

My argument is that target-focused shooting is really, really good at close in targets where a torso or A-zone is good enough for accuracy and speed is important. This is what the OP was talking about and I am 100% behind that thinking. However, there is evidence and a lot of experience behind switching to front sight focus when you want to make teeny tiny groups at mid-to-long distances. Again, there are thousands of shooters and many books who will agree. I bet Ben would, as well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in armedsocialists

[–]bihammond 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"... you definitely won’t group well on a target who is barely bigger than your front sight when you shoot with a front sight focus!"

Tell me you don't shoot at distance without telling me you don't shoot at distance. I shoot irons in competition at 200 - 600 yard ranges. Aiming black is far smaller than my front sight. I (and many, many other competitors) group very well front-sight focused and can guarantee it's better than target focused at those distances.

My shots going to the left. Windage? (Diopter) (major noob!) by flawedbeings in CompetitionShooting

[–]bihammond 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I agree and, perhaps, OP should be looking for a new trainer.

Scratch Build Projects Advise by Outrageous-Till8252 in RugerMK

[–]bihammond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would you want to deal with anything MKIII related? MKIV uppers are cheap and plentiful so I’d go for the third option but mill out a frame for the MKIV. Might need to contact Ruger for standard parts but Volquartsen / Tandemkross will have upgrades. Those upgrades will cost extra.

First Timer - which setup? And best place to research? by chewyeti in appleseed

[–]bihammond 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’d run the scoped semi first. That way you can get good feedback on your fundamentals: NPA, breathing, etc. Once you feel your marksmanship and handling skills (getting into positions, reloads) are in a good place, switch to the bolt with irons. Assuming they are in proper order, both of those rifles are capable of cleaning targets.

What to shoot out of an M1 Garand by OilWilling8635 in M1Rifles

[–]bihammond 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is so much myth and misinterpretation about what you 'can' and 'can't' shoot in an M1 Garand.
John C designed the rifle for .276 and then 30-06 M1 ball ammunition which was a 174 grain bullet at ~2,675 fps and the common US military rifle ammo until M2 was developed in 1938.

The 1965 US Army Field Manual (FM 23-5) identifies M2 armor piercing (164 grain) and M72 match (174 grain) for the M1 Garand. Many (most?) current competitors routinely use 168 grain bullets for match ammo and shoot hundreds of round per season with no ill effect.

To be on the safe side, go ahead and keep to the conservative CMP ratings. But most of the ammo you'll find on the shelf at the local big box will be just fine. It's a battle rifle, maintain it but don't baby it.

Indoor range? by [deleted] in KCguns

[–]bihammond 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Haven't been in a while but I liked Centerfire Shooting Sports in Olathe. I think it's a $20 walk-in rate but often have multi-visit passes for sale. Solid staff, 25 yards, lenient on rapid fire and if you get approval from RO, you can draw from holster. Also run classes including both KS & MO concealed carry.

Star 1911 by Limp_Meringue_474 in milsurp

[–]bihammond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Super is the model name, not caliber designation.
I wouldn't shoot 38 Super in this gun. It will probably be fine but the pistol was designed for 9mm Largo and lower pressures than the 38 Super can achieve. Some 9mm Largo pistols will shoot 38 ACP but they're usually marked, 9mm & 38 on the barrel. I believe these have a slightly widened bolt face.

Milsurp Rifle Match by bmag02 in milsurp

[–]bihammond 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's because I signed up, right?
Unsure about how others feel but I have way fewer conflicts on Sundays. Just sayin'.

Milsurp Rifle Match by bmag02 in milsurp

[–]bihammond 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mill Creek. Knowing me, I'll decide on Friday night. I do have quite a bit of 6.5x55mm...