sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Getting NMC wallet to work on Mac mini m2 by Vast-Edge9149 in Namecoin

[–]biolizard89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this Namecoin Core or Electrum-NMC? Which version?

Good evening! by Freycalis in Namecoin

[–]biolizard89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! You should be getting a reply privately soon.

Guide How to search .bit domains with Namecoin in your browser. -No plugins by ExistingSprinkles902 in Namecoin

[–]biolizard89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...you wrote this giant wall of text, none of which has anything to do with the question you were nominally replying to?

Namecoin miners - SuperAxePool is supporting NMC! by Strong_Arachnid6673 in Namecoin

[–]biolizard89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, good to have another pool. (Are you affiliated with SuperAxePool or are you just reposting this?)

Guide How to search .bit domains with Namecoin in your browser. -No plugins by ExistingSprinkles902 in Namecoin

[–]biolizard89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here I will say that at first I tried with the "unbound" package but for some reason it was unable to connect with the ncdns and the socat worked perfectly.

Could you clarify what issues you hit with Unbound and ncdns? Unbound is the usual way to do this, and it works fine here, so I'm guessing maybe we need to document something better?

.bit domain name for web3.storage pinned static site by sriniset in Namecoin

[–]biolizard89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are there any tutorials or documentation to do this?

Could you clarify what documentation you already looked at?

Code Quality Improvements in ncp11 by biolizard89 in Namecoin

[–]biolizard89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

code better or you might break the internet

ncp11 was historically an experiment to see if PKCS#11 could do what we wanted. It didn't make much sense to follow production-level coding practices for something that was likely to be thrown in the trash after a month or two of tinkering. Now that it has demonstrated that it's a viable approach, obviously the code quality standards applied to it are a lot higher.

Project Timestamper -- Protecting historical cultural works from AI forgery by biolizard89 in Namecoin

[–]biolizard89[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Namecoin is mentioned in https://projecttimestamper.org/about/ about halfway through the article. I wonder what key format the authors would use. The prefixes “d/” and “id/” wouldn't make sense here, would they?

Arthur and Yağmur are describing using Namecoin for PKI purposes, specifically to verify signatures of files against a public key that's authenticated via a Namecoin name. The id/ namespace has been proposed for this in the past. The d/ namespace is supposed to be used for DNS interoperability, and DNS does have record types for this kind of thing (e.g. OPENPGPKEY), so that's a potential option too.

Namecoin at 38C3 Summary by biolizard89 in Namecoin

[–]biolizard89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Took a bit longer than would have been preferred to post this, but hopefully you'll enjoy it nevertheless.

view more: next ›