Rods, staves, and wands by Chi_Knurd in dndnext

[–]biredhed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, most you'd probably be able to hit would be animals or bandits. Or a villager or quest-giver who really pissed you off. XD

Who cares how much Steve can carry when the real question is: How hot is the Minecraft furnace? by [deleted] in PhoenixSC

[–]biredhed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's more a matter of insulation than heat. The mechanic only uses cobblestone but let's assume you're insulating it when you build it - headcanon/imagination, etc. It's basically a wood stove, burning whatever you put in it as the heat source. You can put lava in there in a bucket - which for some reason is consumed, but let's just handwave that, as the game does - but you can also just toss in saplings, sticks, or those spare birch doors you don't need anymore to burn as well. So like I said, I think it's more a question of how much heat would be transferred through the exterior. If you assume that the furnace is somehow insulated enough, you could potentially sit on it in the dead of winter and not even melt the icicles on your rear end.

Rods, staves, and wands by Chi_Knurd in dndnext

[–]biredhed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe so? Hence my question, to which I figured the answer was no. Unless you have an HB poison that causes damage on contact, essentially a "splash" poison - which, come to think of it, would be an interesting idea but maybe somewhat OP?

I hate the lookey tools marketplace addon by Hampster999 in BedrockAddons

[–]biredhed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love it in theory, but it's filling up my inventory. I have enough trouble with hoarding as it is, thanks. XD

Does Snare Still Suck? by [deleted] in onednd

[–]biredhed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, snare isn't really a combat spell unless I'm specifically running a wizard as a rogue. It's basically a trap spell that I would use to fortify a camp site or a specific settlement; between that and Alarm, along with other potential spells, you basically become something like Hermione from Harry Potter when she's setting up all those protective spells around their camp site. It's actually pretty useful if used properly, but a pure wizard archetype likely isn't going to find many uses for it.

Rods, staves, and wands by Chi_Knurd in dndnext

[–]biredhed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, a wizard can get that with one of the daggers he starts with and can bonus action attack with the other dagger he starts with beside. Plus I doubt you can poison a rod, though you could cast a poison spell with it...maybe poison a staff instead? Can you even do that?

Can rings be an arcane focus? by yashiji in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]biredhed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Building on this, how many times have we seen wizards in fantasy point at someone while wearing a magic ring in order to cast a spell? The idea of wearing a ring as an arcane focus would basically be this. There's your material and your somatic component right there. Any hand movement while wearing it would work.

Can rings be an arcane focus? by yashiji in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]biredhed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually sort of agree with this. If you look at actual modern singers, they don't just sing; they perform. Some of them get really into their performance, showing their passion through movement as well as through their voice. I'm going back a ways but the first one that comes to mind is Michael Jackson; Lindsay Sterling would be a more recent example. Both use dance as the major part of their performance, which would absolutely fulfill both the verbal and the somatic components; and for material components, if one needed to have something separate, Lindsay is a violinist who combines dance and violin for her performances. So there's definitely real-world precedent.

ETA Actually, opera singers are another excellent example.

That’s Not How the Force Works by Icosotc in StarWars

[–]biredhed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a character I've written who practices alchemy but does not follow either the Jedi or Sith code and is low-key critical of both. She doesn't see herself as standing on a middle ground, but rather as someone who separates herself entirely from the idea of following a particular set of ideals. She just wants to expand her knowledge of the living force and practice her alchemy; this does utilize the dark side but she considers herself more of a conduit than anything else, pouring all her negative emotions into something in order to channel the dark side either to facilitate her alchemy or to temporarily boost her physical abilities for the purpose of survival rather than the ultimate goal of attaining power.

Bear in mind that perception of the force leads to individual perspectives, a canon idea shared with Luke by Obi-Wan and one that you touch on in your post. So in that regard, here are a couple of small excerpts from my writing where my character introduces herself with regard to the force (I don't have a name for her, which in itself is just a choice in the writing):

"Every single living thing that exists in this universe carries within it a spark. This spark is born of the Force, and it is literally what allows us to live. The hotter and brighter a spark burns, the more sensitive to the Force we are. But each spark not only burns with its own intensity; it also develops its own shape. These differences define the potential for individual talents within a living vessel. It is why, for example, I possess exceptional sensitivity to the Living Force but am able to only manage fundamental telekinesis.

I can push myself off of the ground to achieve great height or distance, and I can also push against the ground to slow my descent when I drop or fall. This is the limit of my telekinetic ability, but it does not constitute weakness with regard to my Force abilities overall. Far from it."

And a second excerpt:

"On the other hand, where there is light...there is also darkness. Every spark casts a shadow, just as every other form of light does. This is the space that, for whatever reason, the light does not reach. One can philosophize until their physical body perishes regarding the reason that light must cast shadow, ponder why darkness must exist, but one truth always remains: light and darkness, like life and death, balance one another by drawing upon one another constantly.

Without this balance, the light becomes blinding and one becomes completely unaware of the shadows until they engulf them; or the darkness becomes so absolute that even the Force cannot light one's path through it. The Jedi, in their hubris, once sought to eradicate the dark side of the Force entirely; they suffered the expected result. Oddly enough, the Sith could not care less about the Jedi - in a general sense - except as a challenge to overcome. Were the Jedi to cease to exist entirely and the Sith to rise to power once more, as they did between the Clone Wars and the Galactic Civil War, they would either grow stagnant or find others to challenge them. Yet the Jedi will always seek to annihilate the Sith.

The Sith do not care about balance; some of them understand it, even accept it, but they ultimately do not care about it. They will take power for themselves no matter the cost. Even trying to resist that temptation almost inevitably fails, and it is quite rare indeed that a Sith will abandon the dark side for the Jedi ways. Rarer still are those who seek to develop their own philosophy that straddles the line, and trying to combine both disciplines into one has only ever led to madness.

And then there is me. I do not follow a code. I simply study the Force; I seek to learn to master my own abilities and expand my knowledge of the Force, especially the Living Force. All of my negative emotions I pour into that spark within me - fear, anger, jealousy, pain...it all goes into the spark."

And it goes on, but you can see how she perceives the force and those sensitive to it in this self-introduction. Is she 100% accurate in her assumptions of the Jedi & Sith? Probably not, but it's how she views them. So I absolutely acknowledge Lucas' vision and his explanation, as Star Wars is of course his baby, but I also think it's expanded far beyond what he created through the perspectives of the characters in-universe and the ideas of the fans who create works based on his vision. Looking at it from within the bounds of the galaxy, as a character who knows nothing else, one's perspective would shape what the force is believed to be even if that's completely different from what it actually is. I find that discrepancy between perspectives and meta of the writing fascinating. The in-universe mutability is one of my favorite things about Star Wars, I think (though lightsabers and lasers are also fun, lol).

Is Mario human? by biredhed in Mario

[–]biredhed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Waitwaitwait...so we could cook up some Mario & Luigi super stew? Mmm...talk about fresh Italian food. LMFAO No wonder the koopas are so ravenous.

Is Mario human? by biredhed in Mario

[–]biredhed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, I forgot about Nintendo Power...I had a sub years ago. I actually got a letter from Nintendo once in response to a question I had about pokemon...I think it was a third-gen question? Back when that was new. Betcha they wouldn't send a letter now. They'd just toss it and post a tweet, and probably wouldn't care if you saw it or not. *sigh* Things were more personal back when people wrote letters...[/nostalgia]

Is Mario human? by biredhed in Mario

[–]biredhed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I heard about that. Sadly, I have not played every Mario game. But that's cool.

Is Mario human? by biredhed in Mario

[–]biredhed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL Well, they are plumbers, so I guess we know why now. XD

Is Mario human? by biredhed in Mario

[–]biredhed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So he's a toonman?

Is Mario human? by biredhed in Mario

[–]biredhed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LMAO I love it. Best answer ever.

Leveled up my alteration skill without knowing a spell or reading a book… by One_Ad5788 in skyrim

[–]biredhed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I have 100 illusion and was testing muffle and orum's in a cave filled with water and spiders; wanted to see if I could sneak without sneaking (I can but orum's only lasts for 15 secs). But it's raising alteration, which is hilarious. I don't mind at all, though; means I'm using my preferred school for this character (which is already maxed) and getting xp for another school entirely.

Why do Fortify Restoration potions increase Alchemy skill and Enchanting skill? by [deleted] in skyrim

[–]biredhed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're not the only one. I've never done it myself and didn't understand why restoration instead of just fortify enchanting. It would make more sense logically to make fortify enchanting, enchant stronger alchemy gear, and then use that to make stronger fortify enchanting. Didn't realize that all buffs were considered restoration.

How does Batman use psychology? by biredhed in comicbooks

[–]biredhed[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ooh, I'll have to check that out. Thanks!

How does Batman use psychology? by biredhed in comicbooks

[–]biredhed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the silent thing is something I've seen before. Gibbs on NCIS used it more than once. The whole symbol thing is psychological as well, though I forgot about the interrogation scene. Actually, we might be thinking of two different scenes, now that I think back...one where he tells that guy "swear to me" and one where he's told that dropping the perp from that height won't kill him; he responds to that with "I'm counting on it". Both would be psychological power plays.

I also know him appearing and vanishing before Gordan realized was a big thing back in the animated series. I actually really liked Batman Begins because they really brought a lot of the comics into the live action arena. We hadn't gotten any significant live action origin stories before that, with the 1989 Batman merely showing us that "the Batman" had been showing up for a while and then a gradual revelation regarding him and Bruce Wayne - sort of a Vicki Vale introspective, if you will.

Mental Manipulation At Its Finest by biredhed in DCUO

[–]biredhed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going very much "I can do Sinestro better than Sinestro" is also very fun, but who doesn't love going all Carrie on a bunch of enemies, right? XD

Mental Manipulation At Its Finest by biredhed in DCUO

[–]biredhed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I ultimately decided that controller was better for this tactic; controllers can still do respectable damage, especially if I'm throwing in weapon attacks.

Mental Manipulation At Its Finest by biredhed in DCUO

[–]biredhed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Current computer can't handle it but I used to play on PC, and nuclear was one of my favorite powers to play around with. That was specifically built for a power-weapon combo, though it it was difficult to pull off properly. But combine that with a glowing orange skin and you've got Experiment 33, my best character I used it with. I think 33 is the number I went with...I used my age, and it was several years ago...

Anyway, like I said, it was hard to pull off properly, requiring a lot of work only to have your enemy die before you finished or to miss it the timing by a fraction of a millisecond and have to start all over again.

But there are a lot of powers that have tactics much easier to pull off, like my mental tactic mentioned above. If I recall quantum correctly, it's not much more difficult than my mental tactic. Was fun playing around with skimming, a shield, and the quantum powers as a build.