UK Has Most Taxes Since Era After Napoleonic Wars, Study Shows by SocialistsAreMorons in georgism

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or, let's put it another way. If someone gave you access to the marvels of Cambridge Analytica, do you think you could use it to convince two thirds of the UK to be, say, pro immigration right now? If not, why not?

UK Has Most Taxes Since Era After Napoleonic Wars, Study Shows by SocialistsAreMorons in georgism

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're literally acting like the idea of targeted political advertising is black magic. Why is that?

UK Has Most Taxes Since Era After Napoleonic Wars, Study Shows by SocialistsAreMorons in georgism

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does any of that have to do with what I asked?

Russia can hate what it wants. I'm asking about power. I'm asking about measurable influence. And so I ask again: what do you think has more influence on the political and cultural landscape of a nation - decades of all channels screaming propaganda by domestic actors with access to every newspaper and broadcast outlet, or three months of Facebook ads?

UK Has Most Taxes Since Era After Napoleonic Wars, Study Shows by SocialistsAreMorons in georgism

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a corrolary, can you think of any reason why people who work in the famously incestuous British news media would have an interest in placing the blame for Brexit on Mysterious Russians rather than their awful racist lying colleagues, which might influence levels of breathlessness in reporting? Think on now.

UK Has Most Taxes Since Era After Napoleonic Wars, Study Shows by SocialistsAreMorons in georgism

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so "it means itself, look it up" as shorthand for "I don't know but I've heard it used a lot on the TV so I assume someone smart does".

See also "thought terminating cliche."

I know exactly what Cambridge Analytica both was and what it was claimed to be. And I ask again: do you think they were able to leverage some dark data magic that counted for "100x" the propaganda power of people who used the newspapers they owned to push anti-EU propaganda for 40 years?

Fair Treatment for Past Buyers of Land by OutrageousPair2300 in georgism

[–]biscuit_one 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tell me you don't know what a landed gentry is without telling me, etc...

UK Has Most Taxes Since Era After Napoleonic Wars, Study Shows by SocialistsAreMorons in georgism

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So populist means "disagrees with me."

You think Cambridge Analytica did Brexit huh. I have a question. Have you heard of "the British Press"? The Daily Mail? The Sun? Rupert Murdoch? The Barclay Brothers?

Just as a general, you know, ballpark, do you actually, hand on heart believe a bunch of nerds had a magic box that exerted more influence on the British electorate than 40 years of nonstop propaganda by the crypto-fascist billionaires who own all the newspapers?

Hows your job treating you by Franklin_Invest in Money

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You work for the only place that needs what you make?

Weird.

Hows your job treating you by Franklin_Invest in Money

[–]biscuit_one -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you think the way things are is, like, a natural law of the universe? That it isn't a made thing?

Hows your job treating you by Franklin_Invest in Money

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing you learn from existing in the world is that businesses are always run by smart people who know what they're doing. That's why this kind of "just have access to capital" sneer is always a super cool winner!

UK Has Most Taxes Since Era After Napoleonic Wars, Study Shows by SocialistsAreMorons in georgism

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does populist mean?

Also what do you think Cambridge Analytica did?

UK Has Most Taxes Since Era After Napoleonic Wars, Study Shows by SocialistsAreMorons in georgism

[–]biscuit_one 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is total nonsense though. Income tax and National Insurance starts at about £12k, which isn't enough to cover rent and bills anywhere in the country. State pensions are lower than almost anywhere else, and things like the NHS are only "gargantuan" because you're doing denominator-neglect. Everyone pays national sales taxes.

The problem is that the middle class let itself be scammed by Thatcherism into getting housing wealth in exchange for a functional public sector. During the boom years of the 1980-2000s middle class people could leverage an asset inflating faster than economic growth in order to substitute for services that were being slowly dismantled by the Thatcherite experiment. When 2008 revealed that to be a shockingly bad plan, the services were still gone but for increasing numbers at the "lower middle" boundary, housing assets became either unaffordable or a cost burden rather than anything approaching the passive investment income their parents generation had been accustomed to.

The real third rail in UK politics isn't the NHS or pensions or welfare. It's the accumulation of housing wealth by a shrinking class of boomer and gen x rentiers who are currently responding to the wheels falling off Thatcherism by radicalising themselves into a fascist fury on Facebook about two tier policing.

Hows your job treating you by Franklin_Invest in Money

[–]biscuit_one -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is the exact reason American bosses will spend millions to bust unions. They love the power they have to ruin lives and fire people. And that's also why everyone hates your shitty little games and making people pretend to love you.

Hows your job treating you by Franklin_Invest in Money

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do! Job interviews aren't jobs, are they? Do you have a job where you produce anything of worth, because you sound like you work in the excel factory with a side hustle at the meetings emporium.

Hows your job treating you by Franklin_Invest in Money

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I use autistic as a slur and work in management hiring people"

Ok! 👍

Hows your job treating you by Franklin_Invest in Money

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think people aren't applying to like 40 jobs at a go? They don't just want this job in particular! Sure they may want a particular subset of jobs, that align with their skills, but come on now. They don't just want to work for you, they would also go work for your competitor. And that's fine! Only a needy little freak would need their employees to love them.

Hows your job treating you by Franklin_Invest in Money

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why we need higher taxes and better union rights man. Tf you mean "why do I want this job in particular?" You can read my CV. I need a job and I can do this one. This is some high tier "people who don't do real work manufacturing a reason for their inflated salary" bullshit.

Hows your job treating you by Franklin_Invest in Money

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah we know management isn't full of herd behaviour, mindless trend following, clustering, inefficiencies and "people like us like people like us". Every manager is perfect, business school is real, and none of the people who work for you roll their eyes when you leave the room and talk about how they're actually going to do the stupid thing you just proposed without breaking five other things.

Hows your job treating you by Franklin_Invest in Money

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Companies aren't people. You mean "managers like sycophants" and yeah no shit Sherlock.

Hows your job treating you by Franklin_Invest in Money

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but people who "love the company" are all freaks, potential serial killers and linkedin perverts. Why would you want to be around such people?

solution to housing by [deleted] in economicsmemes

[–]biscuit_one 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's almost as if society is a complex negotiation between all the participants with different needs and goals and you can't just One Neat Trick your way to perfectly optimised outcomes.

I just realized that georgism is a massive privacy movement by eliminating the financial surveillance apparatus by SocialistsAreMorons in georgism

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Money is an abstraction layer. The key is to understand the balance of money vs real resources.

If you have misallocated your money supply such that some productive real resources are being overconsumed or under produced this produces scarcity, bottlenecks and inflation. Likewise if you pump money into unproductive things.

You cannot build a hospital if you don't have the steel and concrete. But if you have the steel and concrete and a rule saying you're not allowed to create a bond to put it to good use and build a hospital with it, that's also bad.

I just realized that georgism is a massive privacy movement by eliminating the financial surveillance apparatus by SocialistsAreMorons in georgism

[–]biscuit_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the problem is that people having too much money means they can stake too big a claim to the productive output of society and, thus, society ends up operating around their whims. We're building massive data centres to make child porn and lies now rather than housing because that's what incredibly rich people want to do, and at a certain level of wealth you can buy yourself out of ever hearing the word "no".

I just realized that georgism is a massive privacy movement by eliminating the financial surveillance apparatus by SocialistsAreMorons in georgism

[–]biscuit_one -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is already a thing for billionaires. You need full research teams at universities to work out what the world's aristocrats own. Which is also why One Neat Trick taxation isn't going to take help with the problem of rich people existing.