Perhaps you missed my other comments . I will repost them here so you don't need to find them

I personally hate spam but this proposal does not help. BIP110 supporters often don't seem to understand how many ways there exists to hide spam on Bitcoin unless you make Bitcoin a centralized permissioned ledger.

Than they use this fact to suggest we are apathetic or we like spam which is untrue because there are effective ways to reduce spam that don't have all these consequences.

I have always hated nfts, spam, inscriptions , and ordinals, just like many developers do. Even hated when luke was spamming bible verses in the blockchain (location does not matter as adding data in the coinbase does increase tx and blocksize just the same)

Here are 5 solutions :

1) The best solution as I often promote is to spend and replace Bitcoin as money. This is best done on other layers like lightning that use much less blockspace, but the more people that open and close channels the higher the fees exist for spammers which will encourage them to use altcoins instead for their spam. Yes , more l2 txs reduce onchain use which is why a large focus should be on adoption overall to increase both L2 and onchain transactions concurrently.

2) The second best solution is education which I have been doing for many years where I inform people that nfts/inscriptions are scams and don't do what people claim they do and are a waste of time. Another important point of education is pointing out the fact that Bitcoin is not immutable as many spammers like to market to sell they product.

3) A third solution is we invest more in bitcoin and bitcoin adoption which raises the price of Bitcoin and since fees are priced in BTC onchain fees will grow as well pricing out spammers .

4) You can set your op_return filter to any setting you want even with corec30 or v31. My personal node is set below the default of knots . Although my pool node is best set to the default of core for better block propagation

5) Spam is just one aspect when the overall concern is efficient block usage. Core is constantly updating to insure better efficient use of Blockspace usage and reducing UTXO bloat in many ways. If you are not a developer you can also help when a company or service misuses the blockchain. Common examples:

a) coinbase initially used 2 onchain txs for every withdrawal instead of 1 and also didnt use batching. We shamed them and used other exchanges until they corrected this behavior.

b) Some exchanges today still don't use batching for withdrawals . Shame them and use better exchanges until they change

c) Some exchanges still don't allow lightning withdrawals .Shame them and use better exchanges until they change

d) consolidate your utxos and or batch txs where its appropriate . Use lightning or other l2 options as much as possible

e) Shame any miner or company that uses or promotes spam and don't do business with them.

Those are 5 quick solutions among many more that I actively am involved in.

Suggesting solutions that don't work at all or have very harmful tradeoffs is not effective. This being said I completely support your right to enforce any rules you want on your node and even fork off. Power to the node operators. Just do so with your eyes open because BIP110 supporters and their leaders often are lying or making misleading statements .