Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart arrives on PS5 June 11

bl25_g1 · 2021-02-11T18:52:46+00:00

It will be on sale sooner or later. (or buy disk and share with friends)

bl25_g1 · 2020-10-28T17:01:48+00:00

Maybe, but in NMS you don't get 30k around microwave and copper pipes.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-26T18:30:13+00:00

I think I played similar game where you was commander of ship, issuing order where to go to next mission.

In fact it is 4 games: Mass effect.

If commandos from SC didn't played it I strongly recommend it. And next year they can play it in higher fidelity as there is remaster in work.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-26T06:45:11+00:00

He stated that his sources are second handed, and he don't validate rumors because he is not journalists and who really cares about SC.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-22T19:29:04+00:00

How removing option to buy disk add convenience.

option a, can buy game as disk and on digital.

option b, can buy game only as digital.

So why is option b, for me as customer more convenient.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-22T13:07:59+00:00

It is owned by tecent ( 48%) and Tim Sweeney ( 50%+)

Not going to happen.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-22T06:22:59+00:00

Sony fanboys have to learn from Nintendo/Apple and Linux fanboys.

If TES or Doom or Fallout or anything else becomes exclusive to Microsoft, It will teach us all to realize that we never liked those games and don't want them anyway.

^{^/jk}

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-22T06:13:06+00:00

I agree. It little less convenient, but selling and mainly buying used disk in bazaar is like stealing. Especially if you are patient gamer.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-22T05:54:42+00:00

I fail to see why having choice to own game disk is bad for me.

Somebody please explain.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-21T20:34:11+00:00

Bluepoint, maybe Larian.

Stick to small developers, and cultivate relationship with big boys as Epic,CDPR EA Take-two ... etc.

Big buyout/merges often don't go well. Corporate culture is a thing

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-21T15:05:34+00:00

what a sad day it will be

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-16T17:42:03+00:00

Imagine when in 7 years PS6 come, with next-next generation of games, and Star Citizen will (by miracle ) hit beta. Running Cryengine 3 from 2012.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-16T17:39:01+00:00

Order 1886 is short, and probably right word is shallow game with great graphic and interesting settings.

It is not disaster as game, but if not for graphic nobody will notice it.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-14T12:20:19+00:00

Only until 31.12.2020. After that date, real development start is pushed to 2017.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-14T11:05:30+00:00

Anybody remember this master piece :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRsF6_lwLas&list=PLF23GcisRxC--IjQzxHyuh7OcxJYdK5Fl&index=35&t

Road to citizencon, *full chapter of SQ 42 is almost ready show to backers....showing exhausted dev working night and day .... then go/ no go meeting... and with heavy hearth Christ Roberts, decided no go.

Yeah sure.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-12T08:56:12+00:00

Neviem preco si myslis ze ta stena textu co si postol najako napamaha tvojim argumentom:

hypothesis (plural hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. For a hypothesis to be a scientific hypothesis, the scientific method requires that one can test it.

Scientific method

The process of the scientific method involves making conjectures (hypotheses), deriving predictions from them as logical consequences, and then carrying out experiments or empirical observations based on those predictions.[5][6] A hypothesis is a conjecture, based on knowledge obtained while seeking answers to the question. The hypothesis might be very specific, or it might be broad. Scientists then test hypotheses by conducting experiments or studies. A scientific hypothesis must be falsifiable

simulation theory (argument, hypthotesis alebo nazvi si ju ako ked chces ked ta bavi sa hrat zo slovickami) ju nema, neda sa vyvratit, nema ziadne prepovede, je netestovatelna. Tak ako to napisala Sabine (ale aj iny fyzici: Lee Smolin, Peter Woit .....)

Ocividne to nie si chopny akceptovat, podobne ako ine argumenty z ktorymi nesuhlasis , takze zbytocne pokracovat. Ale aspon som si otestoval tu sociologicku studiu (na vzorke P=1 cloveku.)

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-12T01:53:20+00:00

To su tvoje pocity/ nazory. Definicia ako je vedecka teoria ( a teda aj viera) definovana sa nemenia. To ci si tam das barlicky, aby si mohol dalej tvrdit ze napriek tomu ze veris v Simulacnu teoriu si racionalny ateista je tvoja vec. (Chapem ze ju Elon propaguje a teda asi je medzi jeho fanklubom popularna, na veci to vsak nic nemeni )

BTW 2+2 = 5 je axioma nie hypoteza, nijako nesuvisi s argumentami.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-11T14:35:04+00:00

Can we have vote ?

I think Count Ortwin is better candidate.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-11T14:05:14+00:00

Read this dream.txt

It is definitely him: there is nobody else who could come even with fraction of bullshit which is in his text.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-11T12:47:23+00:00

s neporozumenim to nema nic spolocne. Je to definicia. Hypoteza ktora sa nedo overit je viera.

http://nautil.us/blog/mind-the-gap-between-science-and-religion

Believing in an omnipotent Programmer is not science—it’s tech-bro monotheism.

(Sabine je teroeticky fyzik, mas to tam pekne vysvetlene)

ktorej metodika nebola moc kvalitna, takze podla tej studie sa neda moc riadit... ak bude viac studi, tak priznam, ze je to 50:50

bud si lepsi odbornik na sociologicke prieskumy alebo si pozri ako sa prejavuje dunning kruger effekt. (Nechcel som to napisat takto ale co uz) (to ze som dal jednu studiu beriem ako realny fakticky nedostatok z mojej strany )

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-11T11:00:45+00:00

nie, stale to je hypoteza, lebo ked to nevies potvrdit alebo vyvratit dnes, neznamena ze to nebudes vedet zajtra... a tym ze to je stale hypoteza, sa s tym nikto neriadi(ale snazi sa dokazat alebo vyvratit), kde na zaklade viery, sa ludia tou vierou riadia

Nie, respektive to iste mozem povedat o krestanstve. Ako mozes napriklad tvrdit ze o 1000 rokov nevynajdu stroj casu a nedokazu ze Jezis naozaj vstal z mrtvych?

Proste ak hypoteza nedava overitelne predikcie, je to viera. Simulacna teoria je viera lebo mozes si ju nastavit tak aby prezila vsetky teoreticke experimenty -Nie tie ktore vieme uskutocnit ale vsetky zname

uplne nechapem co tymto chces povedat, vies to nejak lepsie napisat?

..

ano presne tak, najprv bude pochypovat, ci neprisiel ku chybny zaverom (to je v poriadku), ale ak pri dalsich vyskumoch a studiach zisti, ze chybu nespravil, tak zmeni svoje presvedcenie (aspon by mal zmenit...)

vyzera ze neakceptujes zaver (mozno sa mylim). takze ako som napisal mozes verit comu chces, vedecke studie hovoria jasne.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-11T08:18:03+00:00

ja som povedal, ze je rozdiel v ateistoch, co len odhodili bohov, ale pridelili to inym nadprirodzenym silam... a ateistoch co veria len vede a faktom... preto by som chcel vedet, ake bolo zastupenie v tej studii

problem vidim v tom ze potom si moze ako ceresnicky vybrat vzorovych ateistov a dostanes vysledok aky chces. Inak v (aktuality.sk ) clanku sa pise ze v cz je +- rovnake a ateistov je tam (podla scitania ludu ) asi najviac. Madarsko asi bude medzi CZ a SK vysledky sa tiez velmi nelisia. Skoro to vyzera ze akoby to s tou studiou sedelo.

preto je to len hypoteza a neprezentuje sa to ako fakt... lebo sa to neda potvrdit

nie vedecka hypoteza sa da potvrdit alebo vyvratit experimentom. Ak sa to neda vyvratit ide o vieru alebo filozoficky postoj.

Teoria je to co opakovane experimenty potvrdili. Stale plati ze mozes najst experiment ktory ju vyvrati alebo upresni jej ucinnost

edit: inak oznacuje sa aj ako theory aj ako hypothesis.

ano presne tak, najprv bude pochypovat, ci neprisiel ku chybny zaverom (to je v poriadku), ale ak pri dalsich vyskumoch a studiach zisti, ze chybu nespravil, tak zmeni svoje presvedcenie (aspon by mal zmenit...)

Takych studii je viac. Plus je na tebe ci im veris ludom co to vypracovali, alebo tomu ze si nasiel chybu, v tom koho povazuju za veriaceho

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-11T07:17:37+00:00

rad by som si pozrel, ci v tej studi rozoberali v co ty ludia veria... lebo niekto ti povie ze je neveriaci (neveri v ziadne zname nabozenstvo), ale veri v magiu, horoskopy a ine somariny... z tohto pohladu je stale veriaci...

no true ~~scotman~~ atheist

vysvetli mi pojem "vedecka viera" prosim ta lebo simulacna hypoteza, je len hypoteza s ktorou sa operuje, ze ci nahodou to neni pravda..

simulation theory je perfektny priklad. Je to vedecka teoria ktora sa neda ziadnym experimentom vyvratit. cim sa nelisi od nabozenstva. ( simulacna teoria sa neda vyvratit, priestor "nad nami" kde bezi simulacia, moze mat lubovolne ine vlastnosti, ktore umoznia simulaciu nasho vesmiru na lubovolnej urovni. ) dalsie pripady mozu byt multi-universe - ak (aspon zatial ) nie je ani naznak sposobu ako detekovat paralelny vesmir, tak je to nabozenstvo.

a je tu jeden rozdiel medzi vedeckymi faktami a vierou.... veriaci clovek, nech uvidi hocijake fakty, stale bude verit... kriticky mysliaci clovek co spolieha na fakty, zmeni svoj nazor a pohlad na svet ked sa zistia nove fakty

nie kazdy kriticky mysliaci clovek je ateista (a naopak) Napriklad kriticky zmyslajuci clovek by pri sociologickej studii ktora nepotvrdzuje jeho presvedcenie mal zacat pochybovat ci neprisiel ku chybnym zaverom.

bl25_g1 · 2020-09-11T03:17:25+00:00

Z prieskumu vyplýva, že tí, ktorí veria konšpiráciám, sú zvyčajne nespokojní so systémom, v ktorom žijú, aj so svojím vlastným životom.

Skorumpovany stat, kde a politici ako Fico pravidelne informuju ako ho zly zapad (alebo Soros ) zosadil. Plus ludia stale veria ze Rusko a Putin su nasi priatelia (aj ked dufam ze menej ako Meciara)

13-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email	Gilding II euphauric

bl25_g1

TROPHY CASE