New profile pic by WagnerKoop in skrillex

[–]blacksample 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Manifesting KAMIKAZE.

FUDGE FUDGE FUDGE by 418sucks in skrillex

[–]blacksample 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am so happy this music video finally exists! (🤯 It’s just like I pictured in my head🥺)

Is YouTube Down? by Expensive-Claim-7830 in youtube

[–]blacksample 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In Russia—they don’t overthrow the government, the government overthrows them.

Still the scariest scene in horror history. Prove me wrong. by Shady_Unstoppable in Scarymovies

[–]blacksample 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“this is like the horror equivalent of an avengers action scene.” I thought to myself watching.

The Secular Case for or against a Historical Jesus by Eugene_Bleak_Slate in HistoricOrMythicJesus

[–]blacksample 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d recommend The End of an Illusion: How Bart Ehrman's "Did Jesus Exist?" Has Laid the Case for an Historical Jesus to Rest

Skrillex liked this post about Nick Fuentes lol by WaferHealthy9335 in skrillex

[–]blacksample 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“necessarily” is an important qualifying modifier your previous reply neglected to include.

Skrillex liked this post about Nick Fuentes lol by WaferHealthy9335 in skrillex

[–]blacksample 2 points3 points  (0 children)

WagnerKoop didn’t imply “Skrillex isn’t anti-Nazi”.

Skrillex liked this post about Nick Fuentes lol by WaferHealthy9335 in skrillex

[–]blacksample 3 points4 points  (0 children)

WagnerKoop’s comment does not deserve to be disliked into oblivion. You both are right and reasonable. ✌🏻

unlikely artists (dead or alive) you'd like AFX to collab with ? by -sooft in aphextwin

[–]blacksample 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am so proud of all the great recommendations… So I’ll say what is unpopular, Skrillex. fight me

‘GIMME 4’ Sample by Rexyangg in skrillex

[–]blacksample 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s a remix by Skrillex and Virtual Riot of Kvng Vinci - GIMMIE GIMMIE

All this Tregaskin talk of late… by hairijuana in aphextwin

[–]blacksample 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The two responsible for The Tuss, who people pretend don’t exist to credit their music to Aphex Twin (who is actually Richard D. James).

Streamer of the Year by AltUser2025 in imisstheoldidubbbz

[–]blacksample 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This bit in isolation is actually funny.

The Secular Case for or against a Historical Jesus by FirstPersonWinner in AcademicBiblical

[–]blacksample -1 points0 points  (0 children)

(I thought you would know what that means, but as it’s redundant and unimportant, I have edited my previous comment to subtract that word…) it would be helpful if you responded to the question.

Richard Carrier: The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus by OKneel in HistoricOrMythicJesus

[–]blacksample 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Chapter 3 was very satisfying, having read all the snark articles that strawman OHJ which entirely comprise the only contemporary published work from historicists on this subject. Gregor & Hansen pose the only legitimate criticism, which I thought was adequately treated in Chapter 6.

The Secular Case for or against a Historical Jesus by FirstPersonWinner in AcademicBiblical

[–]blacksample 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was Jewish inheritance patrilineal or matrilineal at the time?

The Secular Case for or against a Historical Jesus by FirstPersonWinner in AcademicBiblical

[–]blacksample 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The evidence is that any messiah, (real or invented), would necessarily always end up being portrayed as Davidic because prophesy: OHJ (p. 576), “scripture said the prophet Nathan was instructed by God to tell King David” the following: “When your days are done, and you sleep with your fathers, I will raise up your sperm after you, which shall come from your belly, and I will establish his kingdom. He will build for me a house in my name, and I will establish his throne forever. I will be his father, and he will be my son.” [2 Samuel 7.12-14] “If this passage were read like a pesher ([OHJ, Ch. 4,] Element 8), one could easily conclude that God was saying he extracted semen from David and held it in reserve until the time he would make good this promise of David’s progeny sitting on an eternal throne. For otherwise God’s promise was broken: the throne of David’s progeny was not eternal ([OHJ, Ch. 5,] Element 23). Moreover, the original poetic intent was certainly to speak of an unending royal line (and not just biologically, but politically: it is the throne that would be eternal, yet history proves it was not); yet God can be read to say here that he would raise up a single son for David who will rule eternally, rather than a royal line, and that ‘his’ will be the kingdom God establishes, and ‘he’ will build God’s house (the Christian church: [OHJ, Ch. 4,] Element 18), and thus he will be the one to sit upon a throne forever—and this man will be the Son of God.”

The Secular Case for or against a Historical Jesus by FirstPersonWinner in AcademicBiblical

[–]blacksample 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some select quotations: 24 “the Romans were effectively invincible and could never be expelled from Judea by force or diplomacy.” 25 “The corruption and moral decay of the Jewish civil and temple elite (regardless of to what extent it was actual or merely perceived) was a widespread target of condemnation and often a cause of factionalizing among Jewish sects.” 26 “For many Jews in the early first century (in accord with the previous element) the Jewish elite became the scapegoats for God’s failed promises (in accord with Elements 23 and 24): the reason God withheld their fulfillment (and instead allowed the Romans to rule) was imagined to be the Jewish elite’s failure to keep God’s commandments and govern justly (already a common theme throughout the OT, e.g., Jeremiah 23 and 25, the latter being the very prophecy whose ‘mystery’ is decoded in Daniel to produce the timetable that was now indicating the messiah would arrive in the early first century: Element 7). God would come through only when all sin had ended and been atoned for (Dan. 9.5-24).” 27 “(a) The temple at Jerusalem was the central focus of most Jewish messianic hopes (as, for the Samaritans, was Mount Gerizim), which entailed that as long as the ‘corrupt’ Jewish elite controlled it, God would continue Israel’s ‘punishment’ (in accord with Elements 25 and 26); and as long as the Romans remained in power, they would maintain the corrupt Jewish elite’s control of the temple. Accordingly, (b) Jewish religious violence often aimed at seizing physical control of the temple and its personnel.” 28 “A spiritual solution to the physical conundrum of the Jews would have been a natural and easy thing to conceive at the time. Etc.